Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 251
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bernard, Stéphane Clément, Fabrice and Mercier, Hugo 2016. Wishful thinking in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 141, p. 267.

    Caparos, Serge and Blanchette, Isabelle 2016. Independent effects of relevance and arousal on deductive reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, p. 1.

    Castelain, Thomas Girotto, Vittorio Jamet, Frank and Mercier, Hugo 2016. Evidence for benefits of argumentation in a Mayan indigenous population. Evolution and Human Behavior,

    CAVAGNETTO, ANDY R. and KURTZ, KENNETH J. 2016. Promoting Students’ Attention to Argumentative Reasoning Patterns. Science Education, Vol. 100, Issue. 4, p. 625.

    Chan, Paul 2016. Second Nature. October, Vol. 155, p. 151.

    Chen, Ying-Chih Park, Soonhye and Hand, Brian 2016. Examining the Use of Talk and Writing for Students' Development of Scientific Conceptual Knowledge Through Constructing and Critiquing Arguments. Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 34, Issue. 2, p. 100.

    Chen, Ying-Chih Hand, Brian and Norton-Meier, Lori 2016. Teacher Roles of Questioning in Early Elementary Science Classrooms: A Framework Promoting Student Cognitive Complexities in Argumentation. Research in Science Education,

    Cohen, Daniel H. 2016. Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires that We Practice Hearing Reasons. Topoi,

    Correia, Vasco 2016. Contextual Debiasing and Critical Thinking: Reasons for Optimism. Topoi,

    Doebel, Sabine Rowell, Shaina F. and Koenig, Melissa A. 2016. Young Children Detect and Avoid Logically Inconsistent Sources: The Importance of Communicative Context and Executive Function. Child Development,

    Dyrkolbotn, Sjur K. and Pedersen, Truls 2016. Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence.

    Frith, Chris D. 2016. Understanding madness?. Brain, Vol. 139, Issue. 2, p. 635.

    Frost-Arnold, Karen 2016. Willful ignorance. Metascience, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 323.

    Gainsburg, Julie Fox, John and Solan, Lawrence M. 2016. Argumentation and Decision Making in Professional Practice. Theory Into Practice,

    Garcia-Mila, Merce Pérez-Echeverría, Mª Puy Postigo, Yolanda Martí, Eduardo Villarroel, Constanza and Gabucio, Fernando 2016. Nuclear power plants? Yes or no? Thank you! The argumentative use of tables and graphs / ¿Centrales nucleares? ¿Sí o no? ¡Gracias! El uso argumentativo de tablas y gráficas. Infancia y Aprendizaje, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 187.

    Gibson, David R. 2016. The Habits of Normal, Innocent People, as Construed by the North American Juror. Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 39, Issue. 3, p. 397.

    Gorelik, Gregory 2016. The Evolution of Transcendence. Evolutionary Psychological Science,

    Gregg, Aiden P. Mahadevan, Nikhila and Sedikides, Constantine 2016. Intellectual arrogance and intellectual humility: correlational evidence for an evolutionary-embodied-epistemological account. The Journal of Positive Psychology, p. 1.

    Hadjisoteriou, E. and Kakas, A. 2016. Reasoning about actions and change in argumentation. Argument & Computation, p. 1.

    Hahn, Ulrike and Hornikx, Jos 2016. A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation. Synthese, Vol. 193, Issue. 6, p. 1833.


Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory

  • Hugo Mercier (a1) and Dan Sperber (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 29 March 2011

Reasoning is generally seen as a means to improve knowledge and make better decisions. However, much evidence shows that reasoning often leads to epistemic distortions and poor decisions. This suggests that the function of reasoning should be rethought. Our hypothesis is that the function of reasoning is argumentative. It is to devise and evaluate arguments intended to persuade. Reasoning so conceived is adaptive given the exceptional dependence of humans on communication and their vulnerability to misinformation. A wide range of evidence in the psychology of reasoning and decision making can be reinterpreted and better explained in the light of this hypothesis. Poor performance in standard reasoning tasks is explained by the lack of argumentative context. When the same problems are placed in a proper argumentative setting, people turn out to be skilled arguers. Skilled arguers, however, are not after the truth but after arguments supporting their views. This explains the notorious confirmation bias. This bias is apparent not only when people are actually arguing, but also when they are reasoning proactively from the perspective of having to defend their opinions. Reasoning so motivated can distort evaluations and attitudes and allow erroneous beliefs to persist. Proactively used reasoning also favors decisions that are easy to justify but not necessarily better. In all these instances traditionally described as failures or flaws, reasoning does exactly what can be expected of an argumentative device: Look for arguments that support a given conclusion, and, ceteris paribus, favor conclusions for which arguments can be found.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. S. Albrechtsen , C. A. Meissner & K. J. Susa (2009) Can intuition improve deception detection performance? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(4):1052–55.

H. R. Arkes , T. J. Guilmette , D. Faust & K. Hart (1988) Eliminating the hindsight bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 73(2):305307.

A. Bandura , C. Barbaranelli , G. V. Caprara & C. Pastorelli (1996) Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:364–74.

J. A. Berger & C. Heath (2007) Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research 34(2):121–34.

S. Blum-Kulka , M. Blondheim & G. Hacohen (2002) Traditions of dispute: From negotiations of Talmudic texts to the arena of political discourse in the media. Journal of Pragmatics 34(10–11):1569–94.

B. L. Bonner , M. R. Baumann & R. S. Dalal (2002) The effects of member expertise on group decision making and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88:719–36.

S. E. Bonner & G. B. Sprinkle (2002) The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: Theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(4–5):303–45.

J. D. Bragger , D. A. Hantula , D. Bragger , J. Kirnan & E. Kutcher (2003) When success breeds failure: History, hysteresis, and delayed exit decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(1):614.

S. K. Brem & L. J. Rips (2000) Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Science 24:573604.

D. A. Briley , M. W. Morris & I. Simonson (2000) Reasons as carriers of culture: Dynamic versus dispositional models of cultural influence on decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 27(2):157–78.

J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (1979) Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(1):97109.

R. T. A. Croson (1999) The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 80(2):118–33.

C. B. Cunningham , N. Schilling , C. Anders & D. R. Carrier (2010) The influence of foot posture on the cost of transport in humans. Journal of Experimental Biology 213(5):790–97.

M. F. Davies (1992) Field dependence and hindsight bias: Cognitive restructuring and the generation of reasons. Journal of Research in Personality 26(1):5874.

E. Dawson , T. Gilovich & D. T. Regan (2002) Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(10):1379–87.

K. A. Diekmann , S. M. Samuels , L. Ross & M. H. Bazerman (1997) Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: Allocators versus recipients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(5):1061–74.

A. Dijksterhuis , M. W. Bos , L. F. Nordgren & R.B. van Baaren (2006b) On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science 311(5763):10051007.

A. Dijksterhuis , M. W. Bos , A. van der Leij & R.B. van Baaren (2009) Predicting soccer matches after unconscious and conscious thought as a function of expertise. Psychological Science 20(11):1381–87.

A. Dijksterhuis & Z. van Olden (2006) On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42(5):627–31.

P. H. Ditto , G. D. Munro , A. M. Apanovitch , J. A. Scepansky & L. K. Lockhart (2003) Spontaneous skepticism: The interplay of motivation and expectation in responses to favorable and unfavorable medical diagnoses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(9):1120–32.

R. I. M. Dunbar (1996) The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 6:178–90.

R. I. M. Dunbar & S. Shultz (2003) Evolution of the social brain. Science 302:1160–61.

J. K. Esser (1998) Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73(2–3):116–41.

J. K. Esser & J. S. Lindoerfer (1989) Groupthink and the space shuttle Challenger accident: Toward a quantitative case analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2(3):167–77.

J. St. B. T. Evans (2002) Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin 128(6):978–96.

J. St. B. T. Evans (2007) Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgment. Psychology Press.

P. R. Farnsworth & A. Behner (1931) A note on the attitude of social conformity. Journal of Social Psychology 2:126–28.

B. Geurts (2003) Reasoning with quantifiers. Cognition 86(3):223–51.

A. G. Greenwald (1969) The open-mindedness of the counterattitudinal role player. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 5(4):375–88.

C. L. Guenther & M. D. Alicke (2008) Self-enhancement and belief perseverance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(3):706–12.

D. A. Hagler & S. K. Brem (2008) Reaching agreement: The structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses' informal argument. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(3):403–24.

J. Haidt (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108(4):814–34.

P. L. Harris (2007) Trust. Developmental Science 10(1):135–38.

V. B. Hinsz , R. S. Tindale & D. H. Nagao (2008) Accentuation of information processes and biases in group judgments integrating base-rate and case-specific information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(1):116–26.

C. K. Hsee & J. Zhang (2004) Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86(5):680–95.

J. Huber , J. W. Payne & C. Puto (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research 9(1):9098.

J. R. Irwin , P. Slovic , S. Lichtenstein & G. H. McClelland (1993) Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6(1):518.

J. M. Jellison & J. Mills (1969) Effect of public commitment upon opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 5(3):340–46.

D. Kahneman (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 58(9):697720.

S. Keeney , F. Hasson & H. P. McKenna (2001) A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies 38(2):195200.

N. L. Kerr , R. J. Maccoun & G. P. Kramer (1996) Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review 103(4):687719.

P. A. Klaczynski & J. M. Cottrell (2004) A dual-process approach to cognitive development: The case of children's understanding of sunk cost decisions. Thinking & Reasoning 10(2):147–74.

P. A. Klaczynski & D. H. Gordon (1996a) Everyday statistical reasoning during adolescence and young adulthood: Motivational, general ability, and developmental influences. Child Development 67(6):2873–91.

P. A. Klaczynski & G. Narasimham (1998) Development of scientific reasoning biases: Cognitive versus ego-protective explanations. Developmental Psychology 34(1):175–87.

S. L. Koole , A. Dijksterhuis & A. Van Knippenberg (2001) What's in a name: Implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(4):669–85.

D. Kuhn , V. F. Shaw & M. Felton (1997) Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction 15(3):287315.

Z. Kunda (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108(3):480–98.

J. Lao & D. Kuhn (2002) Cognitive engagement and attitude development. Cognitive Development 17(2):1203–17.

P. R. Laughlin , E. C. Hatch , J. S. Silver & L. Boh (2006) Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(4):644–51.

P. R. Laughlin , M. L. Zander , E. M. Knievel & T. S. Tan (2003) Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Informative equations and effective reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(4):684–94.

L. Lee , O. Amir & D. Ariely (2009) In search of Homo economicus: Preference consistency, emotions, and cognition. Journal of Consumer Research 36:173–87.

A. Liberman & S. Chaiken (1991) Value conflict and thought-induced attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27(3):203–16.

C. G. Lord , L. Ross & M. R. Lepper (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(11):2098–109.

E. J. Lucas & L. J. Ball (2005) Think-aloud protocols and the selection task: Evidence for relevance effects and rationalisation processes. Thinking and Reasoning 11(1):3566.

B. Maciejovsky & D. V. Budescu (2007) Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(5):854–70.

M. J. Mahoney (1977) Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1(2):161–75.

N. Mazar , O. Amir & D. Ariely (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research 45(6):633–44.

C. R. M. McKenzie & J. D. Nelson (2003) What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10(3):596602.

A. B. Moore , B. A. Clark & M. J. Kane (2008) Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science 19(6):549–57.

G. Moorhead , R. Ference & C. P. Neck (1991) Group decision fiascoes continue: Space shuttle Challenger and a revised groupthink framework. Human Relations 44(6):539–50.

Y. Neuman (2003) Go ahead, prove that God does not exist! On high school students' ability to deal with fallacious arguments. Learning and Instruction 13(4):367–80.

Y. Neuman , M. P. Weinstock & A. Glasner (2006) The effect of contextual factors on the judgment of informal reasoning fallacies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 59:411–25.

B. R. Newell , K. Y. Wong , J. C. H. Cheung & T. Rakow (2009) Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(4):707–32.

S. E. Newstead , S. J. Handley & E. Buck (1999) Falsifying mental models: Testing the predictions of theories of syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition 27(2):344–54.

R. S. Nickerson (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomena in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2(2):175220.

Y. Niv & G. Schoenbaum (2008) Dialogues on prediction errors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(7):265–72.

E. M. Nussbaum & G. M. Sinatra (2003) Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 28(3):384–95.

M. Oaksford & N. Chater (2007) Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford University Press.

N. Pennington & R. Hastie (1993) Reasoning in explanation-based decision-making. Cognition 49(1–2):123–63.

D. N. Perkins (1985) Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology 77(5):562–71.

R. E. Petty & J. T. Cacioppo (1979) Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(10):1915–26.

F. H. Poletiek (1996) Paradoxes of falsification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 49(2):447–62.

E. M. Pomerantz , S. Chaiken & R. S. Tordesillas (1995) Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(3):408–19.

C. Powell (2003) The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41(4):376–82.

T. Pyszczynski & J. Greenberg (1987) Toward and integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 20, ed. L. Berkowitz , pp. 297340. Academic Press.

D. P. Redlawsk (2002) Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics 64(4):1021–44.

L. B. Resnick , M. Salmon , C. M. Zeitz , S. H. Wathen & M. Holowchak (1993) Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction 11(3–4):347–64.

R. B. Ricco (2003) The macrostructure of informal arguments: A proposed model and analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 56(6):1021–51.

L. J. Rips (1998) Reasoning and conversation. Psychological Review 105(3):411–41.

M. J. Roberts & E. J. Newton (2001) Inspection times, the change task, and the rapid response selection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 54(4):1031–48.

M. Ross , C. McFarland & G. J. Fletcher (1981) The effect of attitude on the recall of personal histories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(4):627–34.

O. Sadler & A. Tesser (1973) Some effects of salience and time upon interpersonal hostility and attraction during social isolation. Sociometry 36(1):99112.

B. Scheibehenne , R. Greifeneder & P. M. Todd (2009) What moderates the too-much-choice effect? Psychology & Marketing 26(3):229–53.

S. Schulz-Hardt , F. C. Brodbeck , A. Mojzisch , R. Kerschreiter & D. Frey (2006) Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(6):1080–93.

E. Shafir , I. Simonson & A. Tversky (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49 (1–2):1136.

S. A. Sloman (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119(1):322.

M. K. Smith , W. B. Wood , W. K. Adams , C. Wieman , J. K. Knight , N. Guild & T. T. Su (2009) Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 323(5910):122–24.

M. Snyder , R. E. Kleck , A. Strenta & S. J. Mentzer (1979) Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(12):2297–306.

D. Soman & A. Cheema (2001) The effect of windfall gains on the sunk-cost effect. Marketing Letters 12(1):5162.

D. Sperber , F. Cara & V. Girotto (1995) Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 57(1):3195.

K. E. Stanovich & R. F. West (1998) Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127(2):161–88.

K. E. Stanovich & R. F. West (2007) Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning 13(3):225–47.

N. L. Stein , R. S. Bernas & D. J. Calicchia (1997) Conflict talk: Understanding and resolving arguments. In: Conversation: Cognitive, communicative, and social perspectives, ed. T. Givon , pp. 233–68. John Benjamins.

C. S. Taber & M. Lodge (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50(3):755–69.

P. E. Tetlock (1998) Close-call counterfactuals and belief-system defenses: I was not almost wrong but I was almost right. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(3):639–52.

P. E. Tetlock & R. Boettger (1989) Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(3):388–98.

P. E. Tetlock , J. S. Lerner & R. Boettger (1996) The dilution effect: Judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both? European Journal of Social Psychology 26(6):915–34.

D. V. Thompson , R. W. Hamilton & R. T. Rust (2005a) Feature fatigue: When product capabilities become too much of a good thing. Journal of Marketing Research 42(4):431–42.

A. Tversky & D. Kahneman (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review 90(4):293315.

A. Tversky , S. Sattath & P. Slovic (1988) Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review 95(3):371–84.

R. D. Tweney , M. E. Doherty , W. J. Worner , D. B. Pliske , C. R. Mynatt , K. A. Gross & D. L. Arkkelin (1980) Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32(1):109–23.

A. Vinokur (1971) Review and theoretical analysis of the effects of group processes upon individual and group decisions involving risk. Psychological Bulletin 76(4):231–50.

A. Vinokur & E. Burnstein (1978) Depolarization of attitudes in groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(8):872–85.

E. U. Weber , E. J. Johnson , K. F. Milch , H. Chang , J. Brodscholl & D. G. Goldstein (2007) Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query theory account. Psychological Science 18(6):516–23.

A. Whiten & R. W. Byrne , eds. (1997) Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press.

T. D. Wilson , D. S. Dunn , J. A. Bybee , D. B. Hyman & J. A. Rotondo (1984) Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(1):516.

T. D. Wilson , D. Kraft & D. S. Dunn (1989b) The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25(5):379400.

D. M. Wolpert & M. Kawato (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks 11(7–8):1317–29.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *