Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-24T19:52:05.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why do we need to coordinate when classifying kin?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

Drew Gerkey
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology & Center for Human Evolutionary Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1414. agerkey@eden.rutgers.edu lcronk@anthropology.rutgers.edu anthro.rutgers.edu
Lee Cronk
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology & Center for Human Evolutionary Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1414. agerkey@eden.rutgers.edu lcronk@anthropology.rutgers.edu anthro.rutgers.edu

Abstract

We suggest that there are two coordination games when it comes to understanding kin terminology. Jones' article focuses on the linguistic coordination inherent in developing meaningful kin terminologies, alluding briefly to the benefits of these kin terminologies for coordination in other domains. We enhance Jones' discussion by tracing the links between the structure of kin terminologies and their functions.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable