Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T05:27:59.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Posted Feedback on Littering: Another Look

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Robyn S. Dixon  and
Dennis W. Moore
Robyn S. Dixon
Affiliation:
Department of Education, University of Auckland
Dennis W. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Education, University of Auckland
Get access

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of posted feedback as a litter control strategy in a university cafeteria. Patronage and litter rates were monitored daily throughout the second term of the academic year. Posted feedback was effective in reducing litter rates relative to baseline. Reductions in litter rates were maintained following intervention and continued to be evident 2 weeks after the completion of the study. Results support previous findings that posted feedback is a simple and effective method of litter control.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 83 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Burgess, R.C., Clark, R.W., & Hendee, J.C. (1971). An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crosbie, J., & Sharpley, C.F. (1991). DMITSA 2.0. A statistical program for analysing data from interrupted time-series Behavioural Computing, Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.S., Knott, T., Rowsell, H., Sheldon, L., & Moore, D.W. (in press). Prompts and posted feedback: In search of an effective method of litter control. Behaviour Change.Google Scholar
Finnie, W.C. (1973). Field experiments in litter control. Environment and Behavior, 5, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, E.S. (1973). Prompting anti-litter behaviors. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 8, 901–902.Google Scholar
Geller, E.S., Chaffee, J.L., & Ingram, R.E. (1975). Promoting paper recycling on a university campus. Journal of Environmental Systems, 5, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, E.S., Witmer, J.F., & Tuso, M.A. (1977). Environmental interventions for litter control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 344–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, S.C., & Cone, J.D. (1977). Reducing residential electricity energy use: Payments, information, and feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 425–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, S.C., & Cone, J.D. (1981). Reduction of residential consumption of electricity through simple monthly feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heberlein, T.A. (1975). Conservation information: The energy crisis and electricity consumption in an apartment complex. Energy Systems and Policy, 1, 105–117.Google Scholar
Kraus, R.M., Freedman, J.L., & Whitcup, M. (1978). Field and laboratory studies of littering. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 109–122.Google Scholar
La Hart, D.E., & Bailey, J.S. (1975). Reducing children's littering on a nature trail. Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, S.M., & Samuel, W. (1980). Littering as a function of prior litter and the presence or absence of prohibitive signs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Houten, R., Malenfant, , & Rolider, A. (1985). Increasing driver yielding and pedestrian signalling with prompting, feedback, and enforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 103–110.Google Scholar
Van Houton, R., & Nau, P. (1981). A comparison of the effects of posted feedback and increased police surveillance on highway speeding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 261–271.Google Scholar
Van Houton, R., & Nau, P. (1983). Feedback interventions and driving speed: A parametric and comparative analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 253–281.Google Scholar
Van Houton, R., Nau, P., & Marini, Z. (1980). An analysis of public posting in reducing speeding behavior on an urban highway. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 383–395.Google Scholar