Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:33:45.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of an Accidental Extinction Procedure on Pokey Players: A Brief Report on the Melbourne Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Linda McDonald ,
Stewart McDonald  and
Greg Murphy
Linda McDonald*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Stewart McDonald
Affiliation:
Grant MacEwan Community College
Greg Murphy
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
*
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2G5, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Extinction is a well-researched behavioural procedure that is used to reduce in frequency, or eliminate, behaviour that is judged to be inappropriate or excessive. Typically, the procedure is implemented contingent upon the exhibition of the behaviour targeted for change. In the present study, the effects of an accidental extinction procedure on pokey players' behaviour are discussed. Extinction is deemed “accidental” in that the procedure came into effect as the result of a power failure. Results demonstrate a gradual reduction in attempts to operate the poker machines over the extinction period, as well as an increase in the collateral behaviours of beverage (primary alcohol) consumption, cigarette lighting, and social interactions. Implications of this study for further research are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 151 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

A gambling-led economic recovery. (1994, 07 5). The Bulletin, pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. (1990). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Toronto: Merril.Google Scholar
Cook, T., Campbell, D., & Peracchio, L. (1990). Quasiexperimentation. In Dunnette, M. & Hough, M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organization psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Fudging, A., The, T., & Data, A. (1995). How to use statistical procedures to make research worthy of publication when the graphs tell you that there are no differences. Journal for People Who Must Publish or Perish, 77, 9–21.Google Scholar
Hope, I., & Pray, I. (1993). How winning at a lottery changed my life. Journal of Expected Social Findings, 13, 62–63.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.S. (1994, 08). The Australian “shout”: Social convenience or public nuisance. Paper presented at “Alcohol-related road crashes: Social and legal approaches” Conference, Griffith University, Queensland.Google Scholar
Kelly, F.J. (1969). Extinction-induced aggression in humans. Unpublished masters thesis, Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. (1973). Hiawatha designs an experiment. Theoretical Prescriptions in Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 331–332.Google Scholar
Luckless, I., & Luckless, U. (1989). A “rational” approach to poker machine playing. Philosophical Sociology, 10, 1–3.Google Scholar
Millhouse, R. (1965). Designing and conducting real social psychology experiments. Popular Electronics, 23, 250–450.Google Scholar
Millenson, R.J. (1967). Principles of behaviour analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
No, S., & Way, L. (1989). We disagree. Journal of Irreproducable Results, 60, 7–8.Google Scholar
On, O., The, T., & Spot, S. (1988). The use of ad-hoc designs in natural settings. Journal of Applied Experimental Design, 2, 15–16.Google Scholar
One, A., Armed, A.N., & Bandit, A. (1990). Let's vary the shock duration and see what happens. Journal for Experiments not Likely to Be Approved by Ethics Committees, 99, 1–10.Google Scholar
Punter, A. (1992). Attributions based on perceived environmental cues in situations of financial loss. Journal of Social Economics, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
Punter, A., Roger, J., & Attaboy, A. (1987). Guidelines for influencing what people will do. Journal for Emeritus Ideas, 19, 31–33.Google Scholar
Skinner, L.Q. (1975). Real behaviourists don't experience: The dangers of qualitative research. Journal of Hardnosed Behaviourists, 84, 1–14.Google Scholar
Women suffer economic loss in gambling boom. (1994, 07 14). The Winnipeg Free Press, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar