Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:06:05.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coercive paternalism and the intelligence continuum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2018

NATHAN COFNAS Open the ORCID record for NATHAN COFNAS [Opens in a new window]
NATHAN COFNAS*
Affiliation:
Balliol College, Oxford, OX1 3BJ, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Nathan Cofnas. Email: nathan.cofnas@balliol.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thaler and Sunstein advocate ‘libertarian paternalism’. A libertarian paternalist changes the conditions under which people act so that their cognitive biases lead them to choose what is best for themselves. Although libertarian paternalism manipulates people, Thaler and Sunstein say that it respects their autonomy by preserving the possibility of choice. Conly argues that libertarian paternalism does not go far enough, since there is no compelling reason why we should allow people the opportunity to choose to bring disaster upon themselves if sometimes they will make the wrong decision. She defends ‘coercive paternalism’. The present paper argues that errors in reasoning are not due only to cognitive biases. People also make errors because they have an insufficient level of general intelligence. Intelligence is distributed on a continuum. Those who fall on higher levels of the continuum have greater abilities, in certain contexts, to reason about both their own and others’ interests. Coercive paternalism may sometimes be appropriate to prevent less intelligent people from engaging in self-destructive behavior due to errors of reasoning.

Type
Articles
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 88 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariely, D. (2008), Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions, New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E. and Ackerman, P. L. (2003), ‘Determinants of health knowledge: An investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 439–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J. B. (1993), Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cofnas, N. (2016), ‘A teleofunctional account of evolutionary mismatch’, Biology & Philosophy, 31: 507–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conly, S. (2013), Against autonomy: Justifying coercive paternalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Davis, T. C., Crouch, M. A., Wills, G., Miller, S. and Abdehou, D. M. (1990), ‘The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials’, The Journal of Family Practice, 31: 533–538.Google ScholarPubMed
Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J. and Starr, J. M. (2003), ‘IQ at age 11 and longevity: Results from a follow-up of the Scottish Mental Survey 1932’, in Finch, C. E., Robine, J.-M. and Christen, Y. (eds.), Brain and longevity, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. (2017), ‘Paternalism’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/paternalism/Google Scholar
Edmonds, C. J., Isaacs, E. B., Visscher, P. M., Rogers, M., Lanigan, J., Singhal, A., Lucas, A., Gringras, P., Denton, J. and Deary, I. J. (2008), ‘Inspection time and cognitive abilities in twins aged 7 to 17 years: Age-related changes, heritability and genetic covariance’, Intelligence, 36: 210–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1986), The moral limits of the criminal law, Vol. 3: Harm to self, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. A. (1997), ‘Everyday life as an intelligence test: Effects of intelligence and intelligence context’, Intelligence, 24: 203–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997), ‘Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life’, Intelligence, 24: 79–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2004a), ‘Intelligence: Is it the epidemiologists’ elusive “fundamental cause” of social class inequalities in health?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86: 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2004b), ‘Life, death, and intelligence’, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4: 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2005), ‘Suppressing intelligence research: Hurting those we intend to help’, in Wright, R. H. and Cummings, N. A. (eds.), Destructive trends in mental health: The well-intentioned path to harm, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. and Deary, I. J. (2004), ‘Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why?’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haier, R. J. (2017), The neuroscience of intelligence, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. and Murray, C. (1994), The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651/1996), Leviathan, or the matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iuga, A. O. and McGuire, M. J. (2014), ‘Adherence and health care costs’, Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 7: 35–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, fast and slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2004), ‘General intelligence as a domain-specific adaptation’, Psychological Review, 111: 512–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. (2010), ‘Why liberals and atheists are more intelligent’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 73: 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2013), ‘Childhood intelligence and adult obesity’, Obesity, 21: 434–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. (2014), ‘Intelligence and obesity: Which way does the causal direction go?’, Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity, 21: 339–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanazawa, S. and Hellberg, J. E. E. U. (2010), ‘Intelligence and substance use’, Review of General Psychology, 14: 382–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L. and Kolstad, A. (2002), Adult literacy in America: A first look at the findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859/1991), ‘On liberty’, in Gray, J. (ed.) On liberty and other essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J. Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J. and Urbina, S. (1996), ‘Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns’, American Psychologist, 51: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Toole, B. I. (1990), ‘Intelligence and behaviour and motor vehicle accident mortality’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 22: 211–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Toole, B. I. and Stankov, L. (1992), ‘Ultimate validity of psychological tests’, Personality and Individual Differences, 13: 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachlinski, J. J. (2006), ‘Cognitive errors, individual differences, and paternalism’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 73: 207–229.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904), ‘“General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured’, The American Journal of Psychology, 15: 201–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927), The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F. (2000), ‘Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23: 645–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, C. R. (2014), Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. D., Hart, C. L., Smith, G. D., Starr, J. M., Hole, D. J., Whalley, L. J., Wilson, V. and Deary, I. J. (2003), ‘Childhood mental ability and smoking cessation in adulthood: Prospective observational study linking the Scottish Mental Survey 1932 and the Midspan studies’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57: 464–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weiser, M., Zarka, S., Werbeloff, N., Kravitz, E. and Lubin, G. (2010), ‘Cognitive test scores in male adolescent cigarette smokers compared to non-smokers: A population-based study’, Addiction, 105: 358–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wennerstad, K. M., Silventoinen, K., Tynelius, P., Bergman, L., Kaprio, J. and Rasmussen, F. (2010), ‘Associations between IQ and cigarette smoking among Swedish male twins’, Social Science & Medicine, 70: 575–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wikler, D. (1979), ‘Paternalism and the mildly retarded’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8: 377–392.Google Scholar
Williams, M. V., Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M. and Nurss, J. R. (1998), ‘Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease: A study of patients with hypertension and diabetes’, Archives of Internal Medicine, 158: 166–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, M. V., Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Parikh, N. S., Pitkin, K., Coates, W. C. and Nurss, J. R. (1995), ‘Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals’, JAMA, 274: 1677–1682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, Z. B., Han, S. P., Cao, X. G. and Guo, X. R. (2010), ‘Intelligence in relation to obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis’, Obesity Reviews, 11: 656–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed