Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Behavior in reverse: reasons for return migration

  • ODED STARK (a1)

Abstract

Received research shows numerous motives for migration, but fewer reasons for return migration. This paper aims to correct this imbalance. Twelve reasons for return migration are presented and discussed briefly. The reasons listed are derived from research on migration conducted by the author in the course of the past three and a half decades. The purpose of the paper is to pull together insights gained from that research so as to formulate a base for future inquiry, both analytical and empirical. In addition, just as research on motives for migration can help to establish the reasons for return migration, research on the latter can help to deepen understanding of the former. Moreover, in a great many circumstances and for a variety of reasons, countries that host migrants may want them to leave. In such circumstances, enacting policies that align with motives for return migration will be more efficient than devising measures that are independent of these motives.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Behavior in reverse: reasons for return migration
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Behavior in reverse: reasons for return migration
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Behavior in reverse: reasons for return migration
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence to: ZEF, University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Strasse 3, D-53113 Bonn, Germany. Email: ostark@uni-bonn.de

References

Hide All
Azmat, G. and Iriberri, N. (2010) ‘The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students’, Journal of Public Economics, 94(7–8): 435452.
Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V. and Rasul, I. (2009) ‘Blissful ignorance? Evidence from a natural experiment: On the effect of individual feedback on performance.’ London School of Economics, Mimeo.
Basarir, H. (2012) ‘Is it all relative? The role of wealth in the migration decision: Evidence from Indonesia.’ Working paper, University of York.
Becker, G. S. (1973) ‘A theory of marriage: Part I’, Journal of Political Economy, 81(4): 813846.
Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D. A. and Moore, S. C. (2010) ‘Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction’, Psychological Science, 21(4): 471475.
Brown, G. D. A., Gardner, J., Oswald, A. J. and Qian, J. (2008) ‘Does wage rank affect employees’ well-being?Industrial Relations, 47(3): 355389.
Cole, H. L., Mailath, G. J. and Postlewaite, A. (1992) ‘Social norms, savings behavior, and growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 100(6): 10921125.
Czaika, M. (2011) ‘Internal and international migration as response of double deprivation: Some evidence from India.’ Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011, No. 21.
Drinkwater, S., Eade, J. and Garapich, M. (2009) ‘Poles apart? EU enlargement and the labour market outcomes of immigrants in the United Kingdom’, International Migration, 47(1): 161190.
Duffy, J. and Kornienko, T. (2010) ‘Does competition affect giving?Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 74(1–2): 82103.
Fan, C. S. and Stark, O. (2011) ‘A theory of migration as a response to occupational stigma’, International Economic Review, 52(2): 549571.
Flippen, C. (2013) ‘Relative deprivation and internal migration in the United States: A comparison of black and white men’, American Journal of Sociology, 118(5): 11611198.
Frank, R. H. (1985) Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Futagami, K. and Shibata, A. (1998) ‘Keeping one step ahead of the Joneses: Status, the distribution of wealth, and long run growth’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 36(1): 109126.
Halliday, T. (2006) ‘Migration, risk, and liquidity constraints in El Salvador’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(4): 893925.
Huberman, B. A., Loch, C. H. and Önçüler, A. (2004) ‘Status as a valued resource’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(1): 103114.
Hyll, W. and Schneider, L. (2014) ‘Relative deprivation and migration preferences’, Economic Letters, 122(2): 334337.
Jagger, P., Gerald, S. and Arinaitwe, A. (2012) ‘Circular migration, small-scale logging, and household livelihoods in Uganda’, Population and Environment, 34(2): 235256.
Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G. and Trost, M. R. (1990) ‘Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model’, Journal of Personality, 58(1): 97116.
Kepinska, E. and Stark, O. (2013) ‘The evolution and sustainability of seasonal migration from Poland to Germany: From the dusk of the 19th century to the dawn of the 21st century’, International Review of Economics and Finance, 28: 318.
Kosfeld, M. and Neckermann, S. (2011) ‘Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance’, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(3): 8699.
Kuhnen, C. and Tymula, A. (2009) ‘Rank expectations, feedback and social hierarchies.’ Northwestern University, Mimeo.
Lauby, J. L. and Stark, O.. (1988) ‘Individual migration as a family strategy: Young women in the Philippines’, Population Studies, 42(3): 473486.
Maslow, A. H. (1943) ‘A theory of human motivation’, Psychological Review, 50(4): 370396.
Neckermann, S. and Frey, B. S. (2008) ‘Awards as incentives.’ University of Zurich, IEW Working Paper No. 335.
Perkin, H. J. (1969) The origins of modern English society, 1780–1880. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pham, T. K. C. (2005) ‘Economic growth and status-seeking through personal wealth’, European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2): 407427.
Pongou, R. and Serrano, R. (2013) ‘Fidelity networks and long-run trends in HIV / AIDS gender gaps’, American Economic Review, 103(3): 298302.
Powdthavee, N. (2009) ‘How important is rank to individual perception of economic hierarchy? A within-community analysis’, Journal of Economic Inequity, 7: 225248.
Quinn, M. A. (2006) ‘Relative deprivation, wage differentials and Mexican migration’, Review of Development Economics, 10(1): 135153.
Ravenstein, E. G. (1885) ‘The laws of migration’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 48: 167227.
Robson, A. J. (1992) ‘Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk’, Econometrica, 60(4): 837857.
Robson, A. J. (1996) ‘The evolution of attitudes to risk: Lottery tickets and relative wealth’, Games and Economic Behavior, 14(2): 190207.
Røed, M. and Stark, O. (1998) ‘On the optimal duration of migration’, in Mundlak, Y. (ed.), Labour, food, and poverty. London: Macmillan.
Sander, W. (1985) ‘Women, work and divorce’, American Economic Review, 75: 519523.
Smith, A. (1759) The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Millar.
Stark, O. (1993) The migration of labor. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Stark, O. (1995) ‘Return and dynamics: The path of labor migration when workers differ in their skills and information is asymmetric’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97(1): 5571.
Stark, O. (1999) Altruism and beyond: An economic analysis of transfers and exchanges within families and groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stark, O. (2013) ‘Stressful integration’, European Economic Review, 63: 19.
Stark, O. (2016) ‘Global integration and world migration’, World Economics, 17(4): 4965.
Stark, O. and Fan, C. S. (2007) ‘The analytics of seasonal migration’, Economics Letters, 94(2): 304312.
Stark, O., Helmenstein, C. and Yegorov, Y. (1997) ‘Migrants’ savings, purchasing power parity, and the optimal duration of migration’, International Tax and Public Finance, 4(3): 307324.
Stark, O., Micevska, M. and Mycielski, J. (2009) ‘Relative poverty as a determinant of migration: Evidence from Poland’, Economics Letters, 103(3): 119122.
Stark, O. and Taylor, E. J. (1991) ‘Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation’, Economic Journal, 101: 11631178.
Stark, O. and Wang, Y. Q. (2005) ‘Towards a theory of self-segregation as a response to relative deprivation: Steady-state outcomes and social welfare’, in Bruni, L. and Porta, P. L. (eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UK Office for National Statistics (2015) ‘Parents' country of birth, England and Wales: 2014.’ London.
Veblen, T. (1899) The theory of the leisure class. Reprints of Economic Classics, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965 reprint.
Vernazza, D. (2013) ‘Does absolute or relative income motivate migration?’ London School of Economics, Mimeo.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed