Skip to main content Accessibility help

The contact hypothesis re-evaluated



This paper evaluates the state of contact hypothesis research from a policy perspective. Building on Pettigrew and Tropp's (2006) influential meta-analysis, we assemble all intergroup contact studies that feature random assignment and delayed outcome measures, of which there are 27 in total, nearly two-thirds of which were published following the original review. We find the evidence from this updated dataset to be consistent with Pettigrew and Tropp's (2006) conclusion that contact “typically reduces prejudice.” At the same time, our meta-analysis suggests that contact's effects vary, with interventions directed at ethnic or racial prejudice generating substantially weaker effects. Moreover, our inventory of relevant studies reveals important gaps, most notably the absence of studies addressing adults' racial or ethnic prejudices, an important limitation for both theory and policy. We also call attention to the lack of research that systematically investigates the scope conditions suggested by Allport (1954) under which contact is most influential. We conclude that these gaps in contact research must be addressed empirically before this hypothesis can reliably guide policy.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The contact hypothesis re-evaluated
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The contact hypothesis re-evaluated
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The contact hypothesis re-evaluated
      Available formats


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

*Correspondence to: Seth Green, Code Ocean, 311 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036, USA. Email:


Hide All

Replication code for this article has also been published in Code Ocean, a computational reproducibility platform that enables users to run the code, and can be viewed here:



Hide All
Abrams, D. (2010), ‘Processes of prejudice: Theory, evidence and intervention’, Human Rights.
Allport, G. (1954), The nature of prejudice, New York, NY: Basic Books.
Amir, Y. (1969), ‘Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations’, Psychological Bulletin, 71(5): 319.
American Psychological Association (2006), ‘Resolution on prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination’, Council Policy Manual. Washington, DC: Author.
Barnhardt, S. (2009), ‘Near and dear? Evaluating the impact of neighbor diversity on interreligious attitudes’, (Unpublished working paper).
Bertrand, M., and Duflo, E., (2017), ‘Field experiments on discrimination’, In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Vol. 1 Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing 309393.
Boisjoly, J., Duncan, G. J., Kremer, M., Levy, D. M. and Eccles, J. (2006), ‘Empathy or antipathy? The impact of diversity’, The American Economic Review, 96(5): 18901905.
Broockman, D. and Kalla, J. (2016), ‘Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing’, Science, 352(6282): 220224.
Burns, J., Corno, L. and La Ferrara, E. (2015), ‘Interaction, prejudice and performance: Evidence from South Africa’, (Working paper).
Camargo, B., Stinebrickner, R. and Stinebrickner, T. (2010), ‘Interracial friendships in college’, Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4): 861892.
Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C. (1963), Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Clunies-Ross, G. and O'Meara, K. (1989), ‘Changing the attitudes of students towards peers with disabilities’, Australian Psychologist, 24(2): 273284.
Cohen, E. G. and Roper, S. S. (1972), ‘Modification of interracial interaction disability: An application of status characteristic theory’, American Sociological Review, 37: 643657.
Cook, S. W. (1985), ‘Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation’, American Psychologist, 40(4): 452.
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C. (2009), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Dessel, A. B. (2008), Measuring the effects of intergroup dialogues on teachers’ attitudes, feelings, and behaviors regarding lesbian, gay, and bisexual students and parents, (Doctoral thesis). University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Dessel, A. B. (2010), ‘Effects of intergroup dialogue: Public school teachers and sexual orientation prejudice’, Small Group Research, 41(5): 556592.
DiTullio, B. J. (1982), The effect of employing trainable mentally retarded (TMR) students as workers within the Philadelphia public school system: Attitudes of supervisors and non-handicapped co-workers towards the retarded as a result of contact, (Doctoral thesis). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Dixon, J., Durrheim, K. and Tredoux, C. (2005), ‘Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis’, American Psychologist, 60(7): 697.
Enos, R. D. (2014), ‘Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10): 36993704.
Evans, J. H. (1976), ‘Changing attitudes toward disabled persons: An experimental study’, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 19(4): 572579.
Finseraas, H., Johnsen, A. A., Kotsadam, A. and Torsvik, G. (2016), ‘Exposure to female colleagues breaks the glass ceiling—evidence from a combined vignette and field experiment’, European Economic Review, 90: 363374.
Finseraas, H. and Kotsadam, A. (2017). Does personal contact with ethnic minorities affect anti-immigrant sentiments? Evidence from a field experiment. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 703722.
Fiske, S. T. (2011), Envy up, scorn down: How status divides us. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ford, W. S. (1986), ‘Favorable intergroup contact may not reduce prejudice: Inconclusive journal evidence’, Sociology and Social Research, 70(4): 256258.
Fuegen, K. (2000), ‘Comparing paradigms of stereotype change: The case for contact’, Arbor Ciencia Pensamiento Y Cultura.
Furuto, S. B. and Furuto, D. M. (1983), ‘The effects of affective and cognitive treatment on attitude change toward ethnic minority groups’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 7(2): 149165.
Green, D. P. and Wong, J. S. (2009), ‘Tolerance and the contact hypothesis: A field experiment’, in The political psychology of democratic citizenship: 123.
Green, S. A. (2014), ‘The effects of roommate assignment on racial affect’, (Unpublished working paper).
Grutzeck, S. and Gidycz, C. A. (1997), ‘The effects of a gay and lesbian speaker panel on college students’ attitudes and behaviors: The importance of context effects’, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 17(1): 6581.
Hall, E. P. (1969), An experimental study of the modification of attitudes toward the mentally retarded, (Doctoral thesis). University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T. and Jennions, M. D. (2015), ‘The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science’, PLOS Biology, 13(3).
Hewstone, M. (2003), ‘Intergroup contact: Panacea for prejudice?’, The Psychologist, 16(7): 352353.
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S. and Levine, M. (1997), ‘On the parallels between social cognition and the new racism’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(3): 305329.
Hull, W. F. (1972), ‘Changes in world-mindedness after a cross-cultural sensitivity group experience’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 8(1): 115121.
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005), ‘Why most published research findings are false’, PLOS Medicine, 2(8).
Katz, P. A. and Zalk, S. R. (1978)m ‘Modification of children's racial attitudes’, Developmental Psychology, 14(5): 447461.
Kelman, H. C. (1998), ‘Social-psychological contributions to peacemaking and peacebuilding in the Middle East’, Applied Psychology, 47(1): 528.
Krahe, B. and Altwasser, C. (2006), ‘Changing negative attitudes towards persons with physical disabilities: An experimental intervention’, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16(1): 5969.
Lazar, A. L., Gensley, J. T. and Orpet, R. E. (1971), ‘Changing attitudes of young mentally gifted children toward handicapped persons’, Exceptional Children, 37(8): 600602.
Lemmer, G. and Wagner, U. (2015), ‘Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2): 152168.
Maoz, I. (2010), ‘Educating for peace through planned encounters between Jews and Arabs in Israel: A reappraisal of effectiveness’, Handbook on Peace Education, 303313.
Markowicz, J. A. (2009), Intergroup contact experience in dialogues on race groups: Does empathy and an informational identity style help explain prejudice reduction?, (Doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
Marmaros, D. and Sacerdote, B. (2006), ‘How do friendships form?’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1): 79119.
McClendon, M. J. (1974), ‘Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice’, Sociological Focus, 7(4): 4765.
Meshel, D. S. (1997), The contact hypothesis and the effects of intergenerational contact on adolescents’ attitudes and stereotypes toward older people, (Doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
Meshel, D. S. and McGlynn, R. P. (2004), ‘Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolsecents and older people’, Educational Gerontology, 30(6): 457479.
Morris, S. B. (2008), ‘Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs’, Organizaitonal Research Methods, 11(2): 364386.
Mussen, P. H. (1950), ‘Some personality and social factors related to changes in children's attitudes toward Negroes’, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45(3): 423.
Myrdal, G. (1944), An American dilemma: The Negro problem and modern democracy, New York, NY: Harper & Bros.
Nosek, B. et al. (2015), ‘Promoting an open research culture’, Science, 348(6242): 14221425.
Olken, B. A. (2015), ‘Promises and perils of pre-analysis plans’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3): 6180.
Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R. and Tropp, L. R. (2008), ‘With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5): 1080.
Pagtolun-an, I. G. and Clair, J. M. (1986), ‘An experimental study of attitudes toward homosexuals’, Deviant Behavior, 7(2): 121135.
Paluck, E. L. and Green, D. P. (2009), ‘Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice’, Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 339367.
Patchen, M. (1999), Diversity and unity: Relations between racial and ethnic groups, Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1979), ‘Tension between the law and social science: An expert witness's view’, in Schools and the courts: Desegregation, Vol. 1, Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse for Educational Management, 2344.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1997), ‘Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2): 173185.
Pettigrew, T. F. (2016), ‘In pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact’, Annual Review of Psychology, 67: 121.
Pettigrew, T. F. and Tropp, L. R. (2006), ‘A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5): 751783.
Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U. and Christ, O. (2011), ‘Recent advances in intergroup contact theory’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3): 271280.
Riordan, C. (1978), ‘Equal-status interracial contact: A review and revision of the concept’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2(2): 161185.
Riordan, C. and Ruggiero, J. (1980), ‘Producing equal-status interracial interaction: A replication’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1): 131136.
Rosenthal, R. (1979), ‘The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results’, Psychological Bulletin, 86(3): 638.
Sayler, R. I. (1969), An exploration of race prejudice in college students and interracial contact, (Doctoral thesis). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Scacco, A. and Warren, S. S. (2018), ‘Can social contact reduce prejudice and discrimination? Evidence from a field experiment in Nigeria’, American Political Science Review, 124.
Sheare, J. B. (1974), ‘Social acceptance of EMR adolescents in integrated programs’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78(6): 678682.
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D. and Simmons, J. P. (2014), ‘P-curve: A Key to the file-drawer’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2): 534.
Smith, F. T. (1943), An experiment in modifying attitudes toward the Negro, (Doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York, NY.
Smith, S. J., Axelton, A. M. and Saucier, D. A. (2009), ‘The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis’, Sex Roles, 61(3): 178191.
Sorensen, N. A. (2010), The road to empathy: Dialogic pathways for engaging diversity and improving intergroup relations, (Doctoral thesis). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Stephan, W. G. (1987), The contact hypothesis in intergroup relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Tucker, E. W., and Potocky-Tripodi, M. (2006), ‘Changing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward homosexuals: A systematic review of the empirical literature’, Research on Social Work Practice, 16(2): 176190.
van Laar, C., Levin, S., Sinclair, S. and Sidanius, J. (2005), ‘The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4): 329345.
Williams, D. (1934), The effects of an interracial project upon the attitudes of Negro and white girls within the Young Women's Christian Association, (Unpublished M.A. thesis). Columbia University, New York, NY.
Williams, R. M. Jr. (1947), ‘The reduction of intergroup tensions: A survey of research on problems of ethnic, racial, and religious group relations’, in Social Science Research Council Bulletin, Vol. 57, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Yablon, Y. B. (2012), ‘Are we preaching to the converted? The role of motivation in understanding the contribution of intergroup encounters’, Journal of Peace Education, 9(3): 249263.
Yuker, H. E. (1994), ‘Variables that influence attitudes toward persons with disabilities: Conclusions from the data’, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9(5): 3.
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Paluck et al. supplementary material
Paluck et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (27 KB)
27 KB
Supplementary materials

Paluck et al. supplementary material
Paluck et al. supplementary material 2

 Word (74 KB)
74 KB
Supplementary materials

Paluck et al. supplementary material
Paluck et al. supplementary material 3

 Unknown (219 KB)
219 KB
Supplementary materials

Paluck et al. supplementary material
Paluck et al. supplementary material 4

 Unknown (6.2 MB)
6.2 MB

The contact hypothesis re-evaluated



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed