Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Does apologizing work? An empirical test of the conventional wisdom

  • RICHARD HANANIA (a1)

Abstract

Public figures often apologize after making controversial statements. There are reasons to believe, however, that apologizing makes public figures appear weak and risk averse, which may make them less likeable and lead members of the public to want to punish them. This paper presents the results of an experiment in which respondents were given two versions of two real-life controversies involving public figures. Approximately half of the participants read a story that made it appear as if the person had apologized, while the rest were led to believe that the individual had stood firm. In the first experiment, hearing that Rand Paul apologized for his comments on civil rights did not change whether respondents were less likely to vote for him. When presented with two versions of the controversy surrounding Larry Summers and his comments about women scientists and engineers, however, liberals and females were more likely to say that he should have faced negative consequences for his statement when presented with his apology. The effects on other groups were smaller or neutral. The evidence suggests that when a prominent figure apologizes for a controversial statement, individuals are either unaffected or become more likely to desire that the individual be punished.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Does apologizing work? An empirical test of the conventional wisdom
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Does apologizing work? An empirical test of the conventional wisdom
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Does apologizing work? An empirical test of the conventional wisdom
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence to: Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies, Columbia University, 420 West 118th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA. Email: richardhan26@gmail.com

References

Hide All
Ashcroft, L. S. (1997), ‘Crisis management-public relations’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(5): 325332.
Athey, S. and Imbens, G. (2016), ‘Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27): 73537360.
Bennett, W. L. (1981), ‘Assessing presidential character: Degradation rituals in political campaigns’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 67(3): 310321.
Bennett, M. and Dewberry, C. (1994), ‘“I've said I'm sorry, haven't I?” A study of the identity implications and constraints that apologies create for their recipients’, Current Psychology, 13(1): 1020.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T. and Gosling, S. D. (2011), ‘Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?’, Perspectives on psychological science, 6(1): 35.
Bump, P. (2015), Losers: A list by Donald Trump. Washington Post. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/08/losers-a-list-by-donald-trump/.
Buss, D. (2015), Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind, Routledge.
Campbell, A. (1980), The American voter, University of Chicago Press.
Caplan, B. (2011), The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies-New Edition, Princeton University Press.
Carey, J. (2002), Political ritual on television. In Curran, J. and Liebes, T. (eds.). Media, ritual and identity (pp. 4270). New York: Routledge.
Chambers, S. (2003), ‘Deliberative democratic theory’, Annual review of political science, 6(1): 307326.
Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G. and Reinartz, W. J. (2005), ‘Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research’, Journal of Marketing, 69(2): 114.
Cross, S. E. and Madson, L., (1997), Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1): 537.
De Bruyn, E. H., and Cillessen, A. N. H. (2006), ‘Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes’, Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6): 607627.
Dillon, S. (2005), Harvard chief defends his talk on women. New York Times. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/18/us/harvard-chief-defends-his-talk-on-women.html.
Farthing, G. W. (2005), Attitudes toward heroic and nonheroic physical risk takers as mates and as friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2): 171185.
Fischbacher, U. and Utikal, V. (2013), ‘On the acceptance of apologies’, Games and Economic Behavior, 82, 592608.
Fiske, A. P. and Rai, T. S. (2014), Virtuous violence: Hurting and killing to create, sustain, end, and honor social relationships, Cambridge University Press.
Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., Gershon, S. A., Shafer, K. and Woodall, G. S. (2007), ‘Capturing the power of a campaign event: The 2004 presidential debate in Tempe’, Journal of Politics, 69(3): 770785.
Gilligan, C. (1982), In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goei, R., Roberto, A., Meyer, G. and Carlyle, K. (2007), ‘The effects of favor and apology on compliance’, Communication Research, 34(6), 575595.
Gorenstein, C. (2015), Anderson Cooper is dumbfounded by The Donald: “Trump defies all laws of political gravity.” Salon. Available at http://www.salon.com/2015/08/12/anderson_cooper_is_dumbfounded_by_the_donald_trump_defies_all_laws_of_political_gravity.
Griskevicius, V., et al. (2009), ‘Aggress to impress: hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5): 980994.
Groseclose, T. (2011), Left turn: How liberal media bias distorts the American mind, New York: Macmillan.
Groseclose, T., and Milyo, J. (2005), ‘A measure of media bias’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4): 11911223.
Hanania, R. and Trager, R. F., (2017), ‘Virtue in our own eyes: How moral identity defines the politics of force’. Available at http://www.roberttrager.com/Research_files/Draft330_3.pdf.
Hanania, R. and Trager, R. F. (2019), ‘The prejudice first model and foreign policy values: Racial and religious bias among conservatives and liberals’. Available at https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3415527.
Harris, S., Grainger, K. and Mullany, L. (2006), ‘The pragmatics of political apologies’, Discourse & Society, 17(6): 715737.
Hearit, K. M. (2006), Crisis management by apology: Corporate response to allegations of wrongdoing, Routledge.
Hemel, D. J. and Seward, Z. M. (2005), Summers: ‘I was wrong.’ Harvard Crimson. Avalable at http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2005/1/20/summers-i-was-wrong-facing-mounting/.
Huddy, L. (1998), The social nature of political identity: Feminist image and feminist identity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA September 3–6, 1998.
Kelly, S. and Dunbar, R. I. M. (2001), ‘Who dares, wins: Heroism versus altruism in women's mate choice’, Human Nature, 12(2): 89105.
Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D. and Dirks, K. T. (2004), ‘Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1): 104118.
Lamba, S. and Nityananda, V. (2014), ‘Self-deceived individuals are better at deceiving others’, PLoS ONE, 9(8): e104562.
Markus, H. and Wurf, E. (1987), ‘The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective’, Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299337.
Mason, W. and Suri, S. (2012), ‘Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk’, Behavior research methods, 44(1), 123.
Newman, L. S. and Kraynak, L. R. (2013), ‘The ambiguity of a transgression and the type of apology influence immediate reactions’, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 41(1): 3145.
Oesch, N. and Miklousic, I. (2011), ‘The dating mind: evolutionary psychology and the emerging science of human courtship’, Evolutionary Psychology, 10(5): 899909.
Ohtsubo, Y. and Watanabe, E. (2009), ‘Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of a costly signaling model of apology’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2): 114123.
Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M. and Agarie, N. (1989), ‘Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2): 219227.
Posner, R. A. (1998), ‘Rational choice, behavioral economics, and the law’, Stanford Law Review, 50(5): 15511575.
Rosenberg, P. (2014), ‘Rand Paul's twisted race lies: His new views on civil rights are as phony as the old ones’, Salon. Available at http://www.salon.com/2014/07/12/rand_pauls_twisted_race_lies_his_new_views_on_civil_rights_are_as_phony_as_the_old_ones/.
Rush Limbaugh Show (2015), Transcript. 21 July. Available at http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/07/21/the_drive_bys_missed_my_point_on_ trump.
Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T. and Vershure, B. (1987), ‘Dominance and heterosexual attraction’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 730738.
Schlenker, B. R. and Darby, B. W. (1981), ‘The use of apologies in social predicaments’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(3): 271278.
Schreckinger, B. and Glueck, K. (2015), Trump camp in crisis. Politico. Available at http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/donald-trump-camp-in-crisis-121180.html.
Simler, K. and Hanson, R. (2017), The elephant in the brain: Hidden motives in everyday life, Oxford University Press.
Steblay, N. M. (1992), A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect, Law and Human Behavior, 16(4): 413424.
Sunstein, C. (2019), ‘Should public figures apologize? Preliminary evidence and speculations’. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3431417&download=yes.
Thompson, D. F., (2008), ‘Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497520.
Timothy Coombs, W. and Holladay, S. J. (2006), ‘Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management’, Journal of Communication Management, 10(2): 123137.
Townsend, R. M. (1978), ‘Market anticipations, rational expectations, and Bayesian analysis’, International Economic Review, 481494.
Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Finkenauer, C., Gündemir, S. and Stamkou, E. (2011), ‘Breaking the rules to rise to power how norm violators gain power in the eyes of others’, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(5): 500507.
Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O. and Zmuidnas, M. (1991), ‘Public confession and forgiveness’, Journal of Personality, 59(2): 281312.
Wilke, A., Hutchinson, J. M. C., Todd, P. M., and Kruger, D. J. (2006), ‘Is risk-taking used as a cue in mate choice?’, Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 367397.
Zaller, J. R. (1992), The nature and origins of mass opinion, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, J. R. and Feldman, S. (1992), ‘A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences’, American Journal of Political Science, 36(3): 579616.

Does apologizing work? An empirical test of the conventional wisdom

  • RICHARD HANANIA (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed