Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Access

Growing outrage

  • CASS R. SUNSTEIN (a1)

Abstract

Why and when does outrage grow? This essay, based on the 2018 LSE Behavioural Public Policy Lecture delivered in February 2018, explores two potential answers. The first points to a revision or weakening of social norms, which leads people to express outrage that they had previously suppressed. The second points to a revision or weakening of social norms, which leads people to express outrage that they had not previously felt (and may or may not now feel). The intensity of outrage is often a product of what is most salient. It is also a product of ‘normalization’; people compare apparently outrageous behavior to behavior falling into the same category in which it is observed, and do not compare it to other cases, which leads to predictable incoherence in judgments. These points bear on the #MeToo movement of 2017 and 2018 and the rise and fall (and rise again, and fall again) of discrimination on the basis of sex and race (and also religion and ethnicity).

  • View HTML

      • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Growing outrage
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Growing outrage
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Growing outrage
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Corresponding author

Email: csunstei@law.harvard.edu

References

Hide All
Abrams, D. et al. (1990), ‘Knowing What To Think By Knowing Who You Are’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2): 97–119.
Bikhshandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., and Welch, I. (1992), ‘A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change As Informational Cascades’, Journal of Political Economy, 100(5): 992–1096.
Brown, R. (1985), Social Psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Free Press.
Bursztyn, L., Egorov, G. and Fiorin, S. (2017), From Extreme to Mainstream: How Social Norms Unravel. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w23415 (Accessed: 15 February 2018).
Elster, J. (1994), ‘Rationality, Emotions, and Social Norms’, Synthese, 98(1): 21–49.
Eyster, E. and Rabin, M. (2010), ‘Naïve Herding in Rich-Information Settings’, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(4): 221–243.
Eyster, E., Rabin, M. and Weizsacker, G. (2015), An Experiment on Social Mislearning. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2704746 (Accessed: 15 February 2018).
Granovetter, M. (1978), ‘Threshold Models of Collective Behavior’, American Journal of Sociology, 83(6): 1420–1443.
Lohmann, S. (2000), ‘I Know You Know He or She Knows We Know You Know They Know: Common Knowledge and the Unpredictability of Informational Cascades’, In Richards, D. (ed), Political Complexity: Nonlinear Models of Politics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kuran, T. (1997), Private Truths, Public Lies, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Myers, D. G. (1975), ‘Discussion-Induced Attitude Polarization’, Human Relations, 28(8): 699–714.
Myers, D. G. and Bishop, G. D. (1976), ‘The Enhancement of Dominant Attitudes in Group Discuission’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20(3): 386–391.
Orwell, G. (1949), Nineteen Eighty-Four, New York: Signet.
Paine, T. (1908), ‘Letter to the Abbe Raynal’, In Wheeler, D. E. (ed), Life and Writings of Thomas Paine, New York: Vincent Parke and Company.
Schkade, D. et al. (2000), ‘Deliberating About Dollars: The Severity Shift’, Columbia Law Review, 100(4): 1139–1175.
Sunstein, C. R. et al. (2002), ‘Predictably Incoherent Judgments’, Stanford Law Review, 54(6): 1153–1215.
Sunstein, C. R. et al. (2007), Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2009), Going to Extremes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ullmann-Margalit, E. (2017), Normal Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wood, G. (1998), The Radicalism of the American Revolution, Rev. ed. New York: Vintage Books.
Zuber, J. et al. (1992), ‘Choice Shift and Group Polarization’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychcology, 62(1): 50–61.
  • Access

Growing outrage

  • CASS R. SUNSTEIN (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed