Skip to main content
×
Home

Nudges that fail

Abstract
Abstract

Why are some nudges ineffective, or at least less effective than choice architects hope and expect? Focusing primarily on default rules, this essay emphasizes two reasons for this. The first involves strong antecedent preferences on the part of choosers. The second involves successful “counternudges,” which persuade people to choose in a way that confounds the efforts of choice architects. Nudges might also be ineffective, and less effective than expected, for five other reasons: (1) some nudges produce confusion in the target audience; (2) some nudges have only short-term effects; (3) some nudges produce “reactance” (though this appears to be rare); (4) some nudges are based on an inaccurate (though initially plausible) understanding on the part of choice architects of what kinds of choice architecture will move people in particular contexts; and (5) some nudges produce compensating behavior, resulting in no net effect. When a nudge turns out to be insufficiently effective, choice architects have three potential responses: (1) do nothing; (2) nudge better (or differently); and (3) fortify the effects of the nudge, perhaps through counter-counternudges, or perhaps through incentives, mandates, or bans.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Nudges that fail
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Nudges that fail
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Nudges that fail
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence to: Cass R. Sunstein, Robert Walmsley University Professor, Harvard Law School, USA. Email: csunstei@law.harvard.edu
References
Hide All
Adler M. (2011), Welfare and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Akerlof G. and Shiller R. (2015), Phishing for Phools, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Alemanno A. and Sibony A. L. (eds) (2016), Nudge and the Law: A European Perspective, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Allcott H. (2011), ‘Social norms and energy conservation’, Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10): 10821095.
Allcott H. and Rogers T. (2014), ‘The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation’, American Economic Review, 104(10): 30033037.
Allcott H. and Sunstein C. (2015), ‘Regulating Internalities’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34: 698705.
Arad A. and Rubinstein A. (2015), The People's Perspective on Libertarian-Paternalistic Policies, Unpublished manuscript, Retrieved from http://arielrubinstein.tau.ac.il/papers/LP.pdf.
Balz J., Sunstein C. and Thaler R. (2013), Choice Architecture and Retirement Savings Plans, in: Shafir E. (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Policy (428439), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bar-Gill O. (2012), Seduction By Contract, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Barascud F., Brown Z., Johnstone N., Hascic I. and Vong L. (2013), ‘Testing the Effects of Defaults on the Thermostat Settings of OECD Employees’, Energy Economics, 39: 128134.
Benartzi S. and Thaler R. (2013), ‘Behavioral Economics and the Retirement Savings Crisis’, Science, 339: 11521153.
Beshears J., Choi J., Liabson D. and Madrain B. (2010), The Limitations of Defaults, Unpublished manuscript, Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/programs/ag/rrc/NB10-02,%20Beshears,%20Choi,%20Laibson,%20Madrian.pdf
Bettinger E., Long B., Oreopoulos P. and Sanbonmatsu L. (2009), The Role of Simplification and Information in College Decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA Experience (NBER Working Paper No. 15361), Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15361.
Brehm J. and Brehm S. (1981), Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control, New York, NY: Academic Press.
Bronchetti E., Dee T., Huffman D. and Magenheim E. (2011), When a Nudge Isn't Enough: Defaults and Saving Among Low-Income Tax Filers 28-29 (NBER, Working Paper No. 16887), Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w16887
Bubb R. (2015), ‘TMI? Why the Optimal Architecture of Disclosure Remains TBD’, Michigan Law Review, 113(6): 10211042.
Bubb R. and Pildes R. (2014), ‘How Behavioral Economics Trims Its Sails and Why’, Harvard Law Review, 127(6): 15931678.
Cain D., Loewenstein G. and Sah S. (2012), ‘The Unintended Consequences of Conflict of Interest Disclosure’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(7): 669670.
Carroll G., Choi J., Liabson D., Madrian B. and Metrick A. (2009), ‘Optimal Defaults and Active Decisions’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4): 16391674.
Chetty R., Friedman J., Leth-Peterson S., Nielsen T. and Olsen T. (2012), Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowdout in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark (NBER Working Paper No. 18565), Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18565.
Conly S. (2013), Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Conway K., Gothro A., Kyler B. and Moore Q. (2015), Direct Certification in the National School Lunch Program Report to Congress: State Implementation Progress, School Year 2013–2014, Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Department, Office of Policy Support. Retrieved from http://www.fns.usda.gov/direct-certification-national-school-lunch-program-report-congress-state-implementation-progress.
de Wijk R., Holthuysen N., Maaskant A., Polet I., van Kleef E. and Vingerhoeds M., (2016), ‘An In-Store Experiment on the Effect of Accessibility on Sales of Wholegrain and White Bread in Supermarkets’, PLOS ONE, 11(3), Article e0151915. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0151915.
Ditto P. and D. (-) ‘Tannenbaum, Information Asymmetries in Default Options. Unpublished manuscript’. Retrieved from https://webfiles.uci.edu/dtannenb/www/documents/default%20information%20asymmetries.pdf.
Downs J., Loewenstein G., Wanskink B. and Wisdom J. (2013), ‘Supplementing Menu Labeling With Calorie Recommendations to Test for Facilitation Effects’, American Journal of Public Health, 103(9): 16041609.
Duncan S., Jachimowicz J. and Weber E. (2016), Default-Switching: The Hidden Cost of Defaults, Unpublished manuscript, Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=46495#reg.
Ebeling F. and Lotz S. (2015), ‘Domestic Uptake of Green Energy Promoted By Opt-Out Tariffs’, Nature Climate Change, 5: 868871. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n9/full/nclimate2681.html?WT.ec_id=NCLIMATE-.
Egebark J. and Ekstrom M. (2013), ‘Can Indifference Make the World Greener?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 76: 113.
Emens E. (2007), ‘Changing Name Changing: Framing Rules and the Future of Marital Names’. University of Chicago Law Review, 74(3): 761863.
Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council (2015), Social and Behavioral Sciences Team, Annual Report, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/sbst_2015_annual_report_final_9_14_15.pdf.
Fagerlin A., Sah S. and Ubel P. (2016), ‘Effect of Physician Disclosure of Specialty Bias on Patient Trust and Treatment Choice, PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’, 113(27), 7465–7469. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2016/06/16/1604908113.full.pdf.
Finkelstein S., Liersch M. and McKenzie C. (2006), ‘Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults’, Psychological Science, 17(5): 414420.
Frey E. and Rogers T. (2014). ‘Persistence: How Treatment Effects Persist After Interventions Stop’, Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1: 172179.
Golman R., Loewenstein G. and Sunstein C. (2014). ‘Disclosure: Psychology Changes Everything’, Annual Review of Economics 6: 391419.
Griskevicius V., Kenrick D. T., Li Y. J. and Neuberg S. L. (2012), ‘Economic Decision Biases and Fundamental Motivations: How Mating and Self-Protection Alter Loss Aversion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3): 550561.
Halpern D. (2015), Inside the Nudge Unit. London, United Kingdom: WH Allen.
Hedlin S. and Sunstein C. (2016), ‘Does Active Choosing Promote Green Energy Use? Experimental Evidence’, Ecology Law Quarterly, 43(1): 107142.
Hirschman A. (1991), The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Homonoff T. (2013), Essays in Behavioral Economics and Public Policy, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Retrieved from http://dataspace.princeton.edu/jspui/bitstream/88435/dsp01jw827b79g/1/Homonoff_princeton_0181D_10641.pdf.
Huh Y. E., Mordwedge C. and Vosgerau J. (2014), ‘Social Defaults: Observed Choices Become Choice Defaults’, Journal of Consumer Research, 41: 746760.
Johnson E. and Goldstein D. (2003), ‘Do Defaults Save Lives?Science 302(5649): 13381339.
Johnson E. and Goldstein D. (2013), Decisions by Default. In: Shafir E. (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Policy (417418), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jolls C. (2015), ‘Debiasing Through Law and the First Amendment’. Stanford Law Review 67(6): 14111446.
Jones R., Pykett J. and Whitehead M. (2014), Changing Behaviors: On the Rise of the Psychological State, Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.
Just D. and Wansink B. (2009), ‘Smarter Lunchrooms: Using Behavioural Economics to Improve Meal Selection’, Choices, 24(3), Retrieved from http://www.choicesmagazine.org/UserFiles/file/article_87.pdf.
Keller P., Harlam B., Loewenstein G. and Volpp K. (2011), ‘Enhanced Active Choice: A New Method to Motivate Behavior Change’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 376383.
Krug S., (2014), Don't Make Me Think, Revisited. San Francisco, CA: New Riders.
Lessig L. (1995), The Regulation of Social Meaning, University of Chicago Law Review, 62(3): 9431046.
Madrian B. and Shea D. (2001), ‘The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 11491187.
Manganari E. and Theotokis A. (2014), ‘The Impact of Choice Architecture on Sustainable Consumer Behavior: The Role of Guilt’, Journal of Business Ethics, 131: 423437.
Manoli D. and Turner N. (2014), Nudges and Learning: Evidence from Informational Interventions for Low-Income Taxpayers (NBER Working paper No. 20718). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w20718.
Mathis K. and Tor A. (eds.) 2016, Nudging – Possibilites, Limitations and Applications in European law and Economics, Switzerland: Springer.
Pavey L. and Sparks P. (2009), ‘Reactance, Autonomy and Paths to Persuasion: Examining Perceptions of Threats to Freedom and Informational Value’, Motivation and Emotion, 33(3): 227290.
Pichert D. and Katsikopoulos K. V. (2008), ‘Green Defaults: Information Presentation and Pro-environmental Behaviour, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1): 6373.
Porat A. and Strahilevitz L. (2014), ‘Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data’, Michigan Law Review, 112(8): 14171478.
Requirements for Overdraft Services, 45 C.F.R. 205.17 (2010).
Ru H. and Schoar A. (2016), Do Credit Card Companies Screen for Behavioral Biases? (NBER Working Paper 22360), Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22360.
Sharot T. (forthcoming 2017), The Influential Mind, New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Sunstein C. and Reisch L. (2013), ‘Automatically Green’, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 38(1): 127158.
Sunstein C. (1996), ‘Social Norms and Social Roles’, Columbia Law Review, 96(4): 903968.
Sunstein C. (2015), Choosing Not to Choose, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein C. (2016), The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein C. and Thaler R. (2008), Nudge, New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Thaler R. (2015), Misbehaving, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 1–10, 309345.
Thaler R. (2016), ‘Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future’, American Economic Review, 106(7): 15771600.
Ullmann-Margalit E. (1977), The Emergence of Norms, Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.
Wansink B. (2013), Slim By Design: Mindless Eating Solutions for Everyday Life, New York, NY: William Morrow.
Willis L. (2011), ‘The Financial Education Fallacy’, American Economic Review, 101(3): 429434.
Willis L. (2012), ‘When Nudges Fail: Slippery Defaults’, University of Chicago Law Review 80(3): 11551229.
Willis L. (2014), ‘Why Not Privacy by Default?’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 29(1): 61134.
Zamir E. (2014), Law, Psychology, and Morality: The Role of Loss Aversion, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioural Public Policy
  • ISSN: 2398-063X
  • EISSN: 2398-0648
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioural-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 808
Total number of PDF views: 2402 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 7999 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 31st May 2017 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.