Skip to main content
×
×
Home

When to consider boosting: some rules for policy-makers

  • RALPH HERTWIG (a1)
Abstract

In recent years, public officials have shown a growing interest in using evidence from the behavioural sciences to promote policy goals. Much of the discussion of behaviourally informed approaches has focused on ‘nudges’; that is, non-fiscal and non-regulatory interventions that steer (nudge) people in a specific direction while preserving choice. Less attention has been paid to boosts, an alternative evidence-based class of non-fiscal and non-regulatory intervention. The goal of boosts is to make it easier for people to exercise their own agency in making choices. For instance, when people are at risk of making poor health, medical or financial choices, the policy-maker – rather than steering behaviour through nudging – can take action to foster or boost individuals’ own decision-making competences. Boosts range from interventions that require little time and cognitive effort on the individual's part to ones that require substantial amounts of training, effort and motivation. This article outlines six rules that policy-makers can apply in order to determine under which conditions boosts, relative to nudges, are the preferable form of non-fiscal and non-regulatory intervention. The objective is not to argue that boosts are better than nudges or vice versa, but to begin to spell out the two approaches’ respective conditions for success.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      When to consider boosting: some rules for policy-makers
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      When to consider boosting: some rules for policy-makers
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      When to consider boosting: some rules for policy-makers
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence to: Ralph Hertwig, Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. Email: hertwig@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
References
Hide All
Abraham, C., Sheeran, P. and Johnston, M. (1998), ‘From health beliefs to self-regulation: Theoretical advances in the psychology of action control’, Psychology and Health, 13: 569591. doi:10.1080/08870449808407420
Arkes, H. R. and Gaissmaier, W. (2012), ‘Psychological research and the prostate-cancer screening controversy’, Psychological Science, 23(6): 547553. doi:10.1177/0956797612437428
Berkowitz, T., Schaeffer, M. W., Maloney, E. A., Peterson, L., Gregor, C., Levine, S. C. and Beilock, S. L. (2015), ‘Math at home adds up to achievement in school’, Science, 350: 196198. doi:10.1126/science.aac7427
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Leth-Petersen, S., Nielsen, T. H. and Olsen, T. (2014), ‘Active vs. passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: Evidence from Denmark’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 3: 11411219. doi:10.1093/qje/qju013
Dallacker, M., Hertwig, R. and Mata, J. (2017), More than just food: A meta-analysis of family mealtime practices and children's nutritional health. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Dallacker, M., Hertwig, R., Peters, E. and Mata, J. (2016), ‘Lower parental numeracy is associated with children being under- and overweight’, Social Science & Medicine, 161: 126133. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.006
Dolan, P. and Galizzi, M. M. (2015), ‘Like ripples on a pond: Behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 47: 116. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.003
Drexler, A., Fischer, G. and Schoar, A. (2014), ‘Keeping it simple: Financial literacy and rules of thumb’. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6: 131. doi:10.1257/app.6.2.1
Eberling, F. and Lotz, S. (2015), ‘Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs’, Nature Climate Change, 5: 868871. doi:10.1038/nclimate2681
Exec. Order No. 13,707, 80 F.R. 56365 (2015).
Frey, R., Hertwig, R. and Herzog, S. M. (2014), ‘Surrogate decision making: Do we have to trade off accuracy and procedural satisfaction?’, Medical Decision Making, 34: 258269. doi:10.1177/0272989X12471729
Gawande, A. (2014), Being mortal: Medicine and what matters in the end, New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M. and Woloshin, S. (2007), ‘Helping doctors and patients to make sense of health statistics’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8: 5396. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x
Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R. and Pachur, T. (Eds.). (2011), Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999), ‘Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans’, American Psychologist, 54: 493503. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493
Grüne-Yanoff, T. and Hertwig, R. (2016), ‘Nudge versus boost: How coherent are policy and theory?’, Minds and Machines, 26: 149183. doi:10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9
Halpern, D. (2015), Inside the nudge unit, New York, NY: Random House.
Hertwig, R. and Grüne-Yanoff, T. (in press), ‘Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions’, Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Hertwig, R. and Ryall, M. D. (2016). Nudge vs. boost: Agency dynamics under ‘libertarian paternalism’. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2711166
Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R. and Gigerenzer, G. (2000), ‘Communicating statistical information’, Science, 290: 22612262. doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2261
House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee. (2011), Behaviour change (2nd report of session 2010–12, HL paper 179). London, United Kingdom: The Stationery Office Limited. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201012/ldselect/ldsctech/179/179.pdf
John, P., Cotterill, S., Richardson, L., Moseley, A., Stoker, G., Smith, G. … and Nomura, H. (2011), Nudge, nudge, think, think: Experimenting with ways to change civic behavior, London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic.
Johnson, E. and Goldstein, D. (2003), ‘Do defaults save lives?’, Science, 302: 13381339. doi:10.1126/science.1091721
Johnson, E. J., Hassin, R., Baker, T., Bajger, A. T. and Treuer, G. (2013), ‘Can consumers make affordable care affordable? The value of choice architecture’, PLoS One, 8(12): e81521. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081521
Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D. and Rajpal, S. (2015), ‘Warning: You are about to be nudged’, Behavioral Science & Policy, 1: 3542. doi:10.1353/bsp.2015.0000
Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W. and Eccles, M. (2008), ‘From theory to intervention: Mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques’. Applied Psychology, 57(4): 660680. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x
Monin, B., and Miller, D. T. (2001), ‘Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81: 3343. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
Nestle, M. (2015), Soda politics: Taking on big soda (and winning), Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
OECD, (2017), Behavioral insights and public policy: Lessons from around the world. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Pollan, M. (2009), Food rules: An eater's manual, New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Ramirez, G. and Beilock, S. L. (2011), ‘Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom’, Science, 331(6014): 211213. doi:10.1126/science.1199427
Rebonato, R. (2012), Taking liberties: A critical examination of libertarian paternalism, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sedlmeier, P. and Gigerenzer, G. (2001), ‘Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130: 380400. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380
Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Barata, P. C., Thurston, W. E., Newby-Clark, I. R. … and Hobden, K. L. (2015), ‘Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women’. New England Journal of Medicine, 372: 23262335. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1411131
Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., Sage, W. M., DesRoches, C. M., Peugh, J., Zapert, K. and Brennan, T. A. (2005), ‘Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment’. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(21): 26092617. doi:10.1001/jama.293.21.2609
Sunstein, C. R. (2013), Simpler, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Sunstein, C. R. (2014), Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2016), The ethics of influence: Government in the age of behavioral science, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Wansink, B. (2014), Slim by design, New York, NY: William Morrow.
Willis, L. (2011), ‘The financial education fallacy’, American Economic Review, 101: 429434. doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.429
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioural Public Policy
  • ISSN: 2398-063X
  • EISSN: 2398-0648
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioural-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed