Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T04:48:19.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can experience with co-speech gesture influence the prosody of a sign language? Sign language prosodic cues in bimodal bilinguals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

DIANE BRENTARI ,
MARIE A. NADOLSKE  and
GEORGE WOLFORD
DIANE BRENTARI*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago
MARIE A. NADOLSKE
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Montclair State University
GEORGE WOLFORD
Affiliation:
Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University
*
Address for correspondence: Diane Brentari, Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago, 1010 East 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637-1512, USA dbrentari@uchicago.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper the prosodic structure of American Sign Language (ASL) narratives is analyzed in deaf native signers (L1-D), hearing native signers (L1-H), and highly proficient hearing second language signers (L2-H). The results of this study show that the prosodic patterns used by these groups are associated both with their ASL language experience (L1 or L2) and with their hearing status (deaf or hearing), suggesting that experience using co-speech gesture (i.e. gesturing while speaking) may have some effect on the prosodic cues used by hearing signers, similar to the effects of the prosodic structure of an L1 on an L2.

Keywords

sign languagegesturelanguage contactprosodysecond language acquisitionconstructed actioncharacter viewpointnarrativediscourse

Information

Type
Research Notes
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 402 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by NSF grant BCS 0547554 to Diane Brentari and NIH DC5241 Ronnie B. Wilbur. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

References

Aarons, D. (1994). Aspects of syntax of American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Baker, C., & Padden, C. (1978). Focusing on the non-manual components of American Sign Language. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, pp. 27–57. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, B. (1999). Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of early and late learners of German Swiss Sign Language. Language and Speech, 42, 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (ed.) (2010). Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D., & Crossley, L. (2002). Prosody on the hands and face: Evidence from American Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 5, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D., González, C., Seidl, A., & Wilbur, R. (2011). Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners. Language and Speech, 54 (1), 49–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brentari, D., & Poizner, H. (1994) A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (1), 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, S., & Emmorey, K. (2008). Co-speech gesture in bimodal bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Process, 24, 290–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, J., Reed, L. I., Ambadar, Z., Xiao, J., & Moriyama, T. (2004). Automatic analysis and recognition of brow actions and head motion in spontaneous facial behavior. IEEE Internal Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 210–616. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org (retrieved October 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Duncan, S. (1996). Grammatical form and ‘thinking-for-speaking’ in Mandarin Chinese and English: An analysis based on speech-accompanying gestures. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., & McCullough, S. (2008). The bimodal bilingual brain: Effects of sign language experience. Brain and Language, 109, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1995). Point of view expressed through shifters. In Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. (eds.), Language, gesture and space, pp. 133–170. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fenlon, J., Denmark, T., Campbell, R., & Woll, B. (2007). Seeing sentence boundaries. Sign Language & Linguistics, 10, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J., & Kegl, J. (1993). Narrative/story structure, pausing, and American Sign Language. Discourse Processes, 6, 243–258.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Dechamps, A. (1975). Analyse contrastive des variables temporelles de l'anglais et du français: Vitesse de parole et variables composantes, phénomènes. Phonetica, 31, 144–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Lane, H. (1977). Pauses and syntax in American Sign Language. Cognition, 5, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2010). Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research, 26, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2006). Some reasons for studying gesture and second language acquisition (Hommage à Adam Kendon). International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, D. (2007). Integrating audio and visual cues for speaker friendliness in multimodal speech synthesis. Proceedings from the 8th Annual Interspeech Conference, pp. 1250–1253. Antwerp: International Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, M., Neff, M., Kipp, K., & Albrecht, I. (2007). Towards natural gesture synthesis: Evaluating gesture units in a data-driven approach to gesture synthesis. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp. 15–28. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. (2009). Cross-cultural variation in speech-accompanying gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, D. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2005). How children and adults produce and perceive uncertainty in audiovisual speech, Language and Speech, 48, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2007). The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2009). Audiovisual prosody – introduction to the special issue. Language and Speech, 52 (2–3), 129–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liddell, S. (1978). Non-manual signals and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding sign language through sign language research, pp. 59–90. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, S., & Johnson, R. (1989). American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 64, 197–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehr, D. (2004). Gesture and intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Loehr, D. (2007). Aspects of rhythm in gesture and speech. Gesture, 7 (2), 179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C., & Valli, C. (1992). Language contact in the American Deaf community. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoni, L. (2008). Classificatori e impersonamento nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Pisa: Plus.Google Scholar
McClave, E. (1998). Pitch and manual gestures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClave, E., Kim, H., Tamer, R., & Mileff, M. (2007). Head movements in the context of speech in Arabic, Bulgarian, Korean, and African-American Vernacular English. Gesture, 7 (3), 343–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGory, J. (1997). The acquisition of intonation patterns in English by native speakers of Korean and Mandarin. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G. (2000). Discourse cohesion in sign and speech. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4 (3), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadolske, M. (2009). Mastering the pressures of variation: A cognitive linguistic examination of advanced hearing ASL L2 signers. Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Nespor, M., & Sandler, W. (1999). Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech, 42, 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nicodemus, B. (2010). Prosodic markers and utterance boundaries in American Sign Language interpretation. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Parrill, F. (2010). Viewpoint in speech–gesture integration: Linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 650–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1992). Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 407–442.Google Scholar
Pfau, R., & Quer, J. (2010). Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Brentari, (ed.), pp. 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggi, I., Pelachaud, C., & De Rosis, F. (2000). Eye communication in a conversational 3D synthetic agent. AI Communications, 13, 169–181.Google Scholar
Pyers, J., & Emmorey, K. (2008). The face of bimodal bilingualism: Grammatical markers in American Sign Language are produced when bilinguals speak to English monolinguals. Psychological Science, 19, 531–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Queen, R. (2001). Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change in Turkish–German bilingual children. Language in Society, 30, 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D., & Mehta, S. (2010). Register variation in mimetic gestural complements to signed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 557–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riazantseva, A. (2002). Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 487–526.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stam, G. (2006). Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. International Review Applied Linguistics, 44, 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, G., Brentari, D., González, C., & Sze, F. (2010). Crosslinguistic variation in the use of prosodic cues: The case of blinks. In Brentari, (ed.), pp. 519–541.Google Scholar
Trouvain, J., & Gut, U. (2007). Non-native prosody: Phonetic description and teaching practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrone, M., Nam, H., Saltzman, E., Mathur, G., & Goldstein, L. (2010). Prosody and movement in American Sign Language: A task-dynamics approach. Presented at the Prosody 2010 Conference, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. (1994). Eyeblinks & ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies, 84, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B., & Patschke, C. G. (1998). Body leans and the marking of contrast in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2007). Routes from gesture to language. In Pizzuto, E., Pietrandrea, P. & Simone, R. (eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies, pp. 107–131. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., Rossini, P., & Pizzuto, E. A. (2010). Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Brentari, (ed.), pp. 332–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar