Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T06:26:56.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive advantage in children enrolled in a second-language immersion elementary school program for three years*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2012

ANNE-CATHERINE NICOLAY*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology: Cognition and Behaviour, University of Liège, Belgium
MARTINE PONCELET
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology: Cognition and Behaviour, University of Liège, Belgium
*
Address for correspondence: Anne-Catherine Nicolay, Department of Psychology: Cognition and Behaviour, Language and Learning Neuropsychology Unit, Boulevard du Rectorat, B33, 4000 Liège, BelgiumAC.Nicolay@ulg.ac.be

Abstract

Early bilingualism acquired from home or community is generally considered to positively influence cognitive development. The purpose of the present study was to determine to what extent bilingualism acquired through a second-language immersion education has a similar effect. Participants included a total of 106 French-speaking eight-year-old children drawn from two language groups: 53 children enrolled in English immersion classes since the age of five years (the immersion group) and 53 children enrolled in monolingual French-speaking classes (the monolingual group). The two groups were matched for verbal and nonverbal intelligence and socioeconomic status (SES). They were administered a battery of tasks assessing attentional and executive skills. The immersion group's reaction times were significantly faster than those of the monolingual group on tasks assessing alerting, auditory selective attention, divided attention and mental flexibility, but not interference inhibition. These results show that, after only three years, a second-language immersion school experience also produces some of the cognitive benefits associated with early bilingualism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by a grant from the Research Council of University of Liège, Belgium. We thank Julie Demory for her assistance in collecting the data.

References

Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Kroll, & de Groot, (eds.), pp. 417–432.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2011). Coordination of executive functions in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 461468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & Barac, R. (2012). Emerging bilingualism: Dissociating advantages for metalinguistic awareness and executive control. Cognition, 122, 6773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & Codd, J. (1997). Cardinal limits: Evidence from language awareness and bilingualism for developing concepts of number. Cognitive Development, 12, 85106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Grady, C., Chau, W., Ishii, R., Gunji, A., & Pantev, C. (2005a). Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: Evidence from MEG. NeuroImage, 24, 4049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19 (2), 290303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Luk, G. (2008). Lexical access in bilinguals: Effects of vocabulary size and executive control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 522538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 (6), 13411354.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Majumder, S. (1998). The relationship between bilingualism and the development of cognitive processes in problem solving. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 6985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M. (2004). Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7 (3), 325339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Martin, M. M., & Viswanathan, M. (2005b). Bilingualism across the lifespan: The rise and fall of inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 103119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Senman, L. (2004). Executive processes in appearance–reality tasks: The role of inhibition of attention and symbolic representation. Child Development, 75 (2), 562569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brysbaert, M. (1998). Word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence against the existence of two separate lexicons. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 163175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron, 33, 301311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, Y. G., & Hakuta, K. (2004). Bilingualism and second language acquisition. In Bhatia, T. K. & Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The handbook of bilingualism, pp. 114144. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11 (2), 282298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, T. H. (2004). A multilevel approach to selective attention: Monitoring environmental space, choosing stimuli for deep processing, and retrieving information from memory. In Posner, M. I. (ed.), Cognitive neurosciences of attention, pp. 5671. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Chevrie-Muller, C., Simon, A.-M., Le Normand, M. T., & Fournier, S. (2001). NEEL: Nouvelles Epreuves pour l'Examen du Langage [New Tests for Language Examination]. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
Colzato, L. S., Bajo, M. T., van den Wildenberg, W., Paolieri, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., La Heij, W., & Hommel, B. (2008). How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (2), 302312.Google ScholarPubMed
Comblain, A., & Rondal, J.A. (2001). Apprendre les langues: où, quand, comment? [Learning languages: where, when, how?]. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don't. Cognition, 113, 135149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 5986.Google ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (1987). Bilingualism, language proficiency, and metalinguistic development. In Homel, P., Palij, M. & Aaronson, D. (eds.), Childhood bilingualism: Aspects of linguistic, cognitive and social development, pp. 5773. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). PPVT-R: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). BPVT: British Picture Vocabulary Test. Windsor: Nelson.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Thériault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). EVIP: Echelle de Vocabulaire en Images Peabody [French adaptation of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised]. Richmond Hill, Canada: Psycan.Google Scholar
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, F. M. (2000). The Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd edition). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Bilingual lexical access. In Rapp, B. (ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind, pp. 321345. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Green, C., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inurritegui, S. (2009). Bilingualism and the development of cognitive control. Ph.D. dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven.Google Scholar
Kovács, Á. M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (16), 65566560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, J. F., & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.) (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Dijkstra, A. (2002). The bilingual lexicon. In Kaplan, R. (ed.), Handbook of applied linguistics, pp. 301321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 25/97 (9), 44144416.Google Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M. M., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11 (1), 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezzacappa, E. (2004). Alerting, orienting, and executive attention: Developmental properties and sociodemographic correlates in an epidemiological sample of young, urban children. Child Development, 75 (5), 13731386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, J. B., & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10 (6), 719726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, J. B., & Harper, S. N. (2009). Bilinguals show an advantage in cognitive control – The question is why. Developmental Science, 12 (4), 502503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In Davidson, R. J., Schwartz, G. E. & Shapiro, D. (eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory, pp. 118. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1984). Aphasie et traduction. META Translators’ Journal, 29, 5767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2000). Aphasie chez les bilingues et les multilingues. In Rondal, J. A. & Seron, X. (eds.), Troubles du langage: Bases théoriques, diagnostic et rééducation, pp. 530549. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Peal, E., & Lambert, W. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs, 76 (546), 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin-Dubois, D., Blaye, A., Coutya, J., & Bialystok, E. (2011). The effects of bilingualism on toddlers’ executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108 (3), 567579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1998). Progressive Coloured Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Ricciardelli, L. A. (1992). Bilingualism and cognitive development in relation to threshold theory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 301316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romaine, S. (1999). Bilingual language development. In Barret, M. (ed.), The development of language, pp. 251275. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, pp. 332. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. (2005). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In Kroll, & de Groot, (eds.), pp. 371–388.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Frye, D., & Rapus, T. (1996). An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognitive Development, 11, 3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, P., Gondan, M., & Fimm, B. (2002). KiTAP: Test for Attentional Performance in Children. Herzogenrath: Psytest.Google Scholar