Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-22T21:54:18.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2003

JANET G. VAN HELL
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
ANNETTE M. B. DE GROOT
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam

Abstract

A word association experiment examined conceptual representation in bilingual memory. Dutch-English bilinguals associated twice to nouns and verbs that varied on concreteness and cognate status, once in the language of the stimuli (within-language), and once in the other language (between-language). Within- and between-language associations for concrete words and for cognates were more often translations of one another than those for abstract words and noncognates, and nouns evoked more translations than verbs. In both within- and between-language association, retrieving an associate was easier to concrete than to abstract words, to cognates than to noncognates, and to nouns than to verbs. These findings suggest that conceptual representation in bilingual memory depends on word-type and grammatical class: concrete translations, cognates, and noun translations more often share, or share larger parts of, a conceptual representation than abstract translations, noncognates, and verb translations. The results are discussed within the framework of distributed memory representation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

In carrying out this research, Janet G. van Hell was supported by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, Grant 575-56-073). Part of this study was presented at the Ninth Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Würzburg, Germany, September 1996. We thank Evelien van Hell, Frans Padt, and Martin van Leerdam for their contributions to this study. We thank Alexandra Sholl, Anna Bosman, François Grosjean, Jim Clark, Judith Kroll, Marilyn Smith, and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper.