Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-28T02:36:53.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of formal modelling for the development of cognitive theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2021

Randall K. Jamieson ,
Brendan T. Johns ,
Vanessa Taler  and
Michael N. Jones
Randall K. Jamieson*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Brendan T. Johns
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Vanessa Taler
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Michael N. Jones
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Randall K. Jamieson Department of Psychology University of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2 Email: randy.jamieson@umanitoba.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 218 - 219
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aujla, H (2021) Language experience predicts semantic priming of lexical decision. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 75, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatia, S (2017) Associative judgment and vector space semantics. Psychological Review 124, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordag, D, Gor, K and Opitz, A (2021) Ontogenesis Model of the L2 Lexical Representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–17. doi:10.1017/S1366728921000250Google Scholar
Griffiths, TL, Steyvers, M and Tenenbaum, JB (2007) Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review 114, 211–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollis, G and Westbury, C (2016) The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23, 1744–1756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamieson, RK, Avery, JE, Johns, BT and Jones, MN (2018) An instance theory of semantic memory. Computational Brain & Behavior 1, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, BT and Jamieson, RK (2019) The influence of time and place on lexical behavior: A distributional analysis. Behavior Research Methods 51, 2483–2453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johns, BT, Jamieson, RK, Crump, MJC, Jones, MN and Mewhort, DJK (2020) Production without rules: Using an instance memory model to exploit structure in natural language. Journal of Memory and Language, 104165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, BT, Jones, MN and Mewhort, DJK (2021) A continuous source reinstatement model of true and false recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 75, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, BT, Sheppard, C, Jones, MN and Taler, V (2016) The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization across aging and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, BT, Taler, V, Pisoni, DB, Farlow, MR, Hake, AM, Kareken, DA, Unverzagt, FW and Jones, MN (2018) Cognitive modeling as an interface between brain and behavior: Measuring the semantic decline in mild cognitive impairment. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 72, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, MN and Mewhort, DJK (2007) Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review 114, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwantes, PJ (2005) Using context to build semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landauer, TK and Dumais, ST (1997) A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104, 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, K and Burgess, C (1996) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, T, Sutskever, I, Chen, K, Corrado, GS and Dean, J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 3111–3119).Google Scholar
Montag, JL, Jones, MN and Smith, LB (2015) The Words Children Hear: Picture Books and the Statistics for Language Learning. Psychological science 26, 1489–1496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennington, J, Socher, R and Manning, CD (2014) GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1532–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar