Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-lqwgf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-07T21:05:51.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The measure matters: Language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish–English bilingual children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2012

LISA M. BEDORE*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
ELIZABETH D. PEÑA
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
CONNIE L. SUMMERS
Affiliation:
The University of Texas El Paso
KARIN M. BOERGER
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
MARIA D. RESENDIZ
Affiliation:
Texas State University San Marcos
KAI GREENE
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
THOMAS M. BOHMAN
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
RONALD B. GILLAM
Affiliation:
Utah State University
*
Address for correspondence: Lisa M. Bedore, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 1 University Station A1100, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, 512-232-5101, USA lbedore@mail.utexas.edu

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if different language measures resulted in the same classifications of language dominance and proficiency for a group of bilingual pre-kindergarteners and kindergarteners. Data were analyzed for 1029 Spanish–English bilingual pre-kindergarteners who spanned the full range of bilingual language proficiency. Parent questionnaires were used to quantify age of first exposure and current language use. Scores from a short test of semantic and morphosyntactic development in Spanish and English were used to quantify children's performance. Some children who were in the functionally monolingual range based on interview data demonstrated minimal knowledge of their other languages when tested. Current use accounted for more of the variance in language dominance than did age of first exposure. Results indicate that at different levels of language exposure children differed in their performance on semantic and morphosyntax tasks. These patterns suggest that it may be difficult to compare the results of studies that employ different measures of language dominance and proficiency. Current use is likely to be a useful metric of bilingual development that can be used to build a comprehensive picture of child bilingualism.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable