Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-kpmwg Total loading time: 0.239 Render date: 2021-11-28T03:41:59.777Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

JUDIT KORMOS*
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
ANNA SÁFÁR
Affiliation:
Department of English Applied Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
*
Address for correspondence: Judit Kormos, Department of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University, LA1 4YT, U.K.j.kormos@lancaster.ac.uk

Abstract

In our research we addressed the question what the relationship is between phonological short-term and working memory capacity and performance in an end-of-year reading, writing, listening, speaking and use of English test. The participants of our study were 121 secondary school students aged 15–16 in the first intensive language training year of a bilingual education program in Hungary. The participants performed a non-word repetition test and took a Cambridge First Certificate Exam. Fifty students were also tested with a backward digit span test, measuring their working memory capacity. Our study indicates that phonological short-term memory capacity plays a different role in the case of beginners and pre-intermediate students in intensive language learning. The backward digit span test correlated very highly with the overall English language competence, as well as with reading, listening, speaking and use of English (vocabulary and grammar) test scores.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Judit Kormos has been supported in writing this article by the Bolyai Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

References

Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. 2003. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. J. 1974. Working memory. In Bower, G. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 8), pp. 4790. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Botwinick, J. & Storandt, M. 1974. Memory, related functions and age. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1981. Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. C. (ed.), Individual differences and univerals in language learning aptitude, pp. 119155. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. & Sapon, S. M. 1959. Modern Language Aptitude Test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Cheung, H. 1996. Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 3, 867873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colom, R., Shih, P. C., Flores-Mendoza, C. & Quiroga, M. A. 2006. The real relationship between short-term memory and working memory. Memory, 14, 804813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. 1992. NEO-PI-R: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M. 1986. A functional account of age differences in memory. In Klix, F. & Hagendorf, H. (eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities, pp. 409421. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehrman, M. E. & Oxford, R. L. 1995. Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79, 6789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. 1996. Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. 2006. Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100121.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & Sinclair, S. 1996. Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 234250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J. & Tuholski, S. W. 1999. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (eds.), Models of working memory, pp. 102134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortkamp, M. B. M. 1999. Working memory capacity and aspects of L2 speech production. Communication and Cognition, 32, 259296.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. 1985. Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. 1995. Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory and Cognition, 23, 8394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, S. E. 1999. Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (11), 410419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, S. E. 2006. Non-word repetition and word learning: The nature of relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513543.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. & Alloway, T. P. 2008. Working memory and classroom learning. In Thurman, K. & Fiorello, K. (eds.), Cognitive development in K-3 classroom learning: Research applications, pp. 1538. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Willis, C. S. & Adams, A. M. 2006. Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 265281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, S. E., Brown, L. & Pickering, S. J. 2003. Working memory assessments at school entry as longitudinal predictors of National Curriculum attainment levels. Educational and Child Psychology, 20, 109122.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Hitch, G. J., Service, E. & Martin, A. J. 1997. Phonological short-term memory and new word learning in children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 966979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, S. E., Tiffany, C., Briscoe, J., Thorn, A. S. C. & ALSPAC Team. 2005. Developmental consequences of poor phonological short-term memory function in childhood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 598611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, J. B., Hoeppner, J. A. B. & Fiorello, C. A. 2002. Analyzing digit span components for assessment of attention processes. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 128143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M. 2001. Sentence processing. In Robinson, (ed.), pp. 91–124.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. & Sawyer, M. 1992. L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skills. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A. F. & Bourne, L. E. (eds.) 1998. Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Maughan, S. & Brown, G. D. A. 1991. Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 685701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, S. & Everatt, J. 2004. Working memory: Its role in dyslexia and other specific learning difficulties. Dyslexia, 10, 196214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kormos, J. 2006. Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Logie, R. H., Gilhooly, K. J. & Wynn, V. 1994. Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 22, 395410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A. & Tatsumi, T. 2002. Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In Robinson, (ed.) (2002a), pp. 181–209.Google Scholar
Masoura, V. M. & Gathercole, S. E. 1999. Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 383388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masoura, V. M. & Gathercole, S. E. 2005. Phonological short-term memory skills and new word learning in young Greek children. Memory, 13, 422429.Google Scholar
Miyake, A. & Friedman, D. 1998. Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, & Bourne, (eds.), pp. 339–364.Google Scholar
Morra, S. 1994. Issues in working memory development: Testing for M-capacity. International Journal of Behavioral Development (Special Issue), 143–159.Google Scholar
O'Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J. & Freed, B. 2006. Phonological memory and lexical narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C. & Vallar, G. 1995. Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 48A (1), 98107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (eds.), Language and communication, pp. 317331. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Racsmány, M., Lukács, Á., Németh, D. & Pléh, Cs. 2005. A verbális munkamemória magyar nyelvu vizsgálóeljárásai [Verbal working memory testing procedures in Hungarian]. Pszichológiai Szemle, 60, 479506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (ed.) 2001. Cognition and second language instruction, pp. 319353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. 2002. Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfeld and Hernstadt, 1991. In Robinson, (ed.) (2002a) pp. 211–266.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (ed.) 2002a. Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. 2005. Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 4573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, M. & Ranta, L. 2001. Aptitude, individual differences and instructional design. In Robinson, (ed.), pp. 319–353.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. & Crombie, M. 2003. Dyslexia and foreign language learning. London: Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar
Service, E. 1992. Phonology, working memory and foreign language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, E. & Kohonen, V. 1995. Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. 1986. Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In Cook, V. (ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition, pp. 8194. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. 1989. Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. L. & Ganschow, E. 1991. Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native language aptitude differences? Modern Language Journal, 75, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R. & Ganschow, L. 2001. Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speciale, G., Ellis, N. C. & Bywater, T. 2004. Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 293321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S. & Caplan, D. 2003. The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 550564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, G. & Simon, H. A. 1985. STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and the acoustic loop hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 13, 93201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
126
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *