Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T05:26:42.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second language learners develop non-native lexical processing biases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

Seth Wiener
Seth Wiener*
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
*
Author for correspondence: Seth Wiener, E-mail: sethw1@cmu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Infants develop language-specific biases favoring either consonantal or vocalic information. These phonological biases affect various levels of spoken-language recognition in children and adults. This study explored whether adults who speak a second language (L2) apply phonological biases during L2 lexical processing, and whether the biases applied are those of the native language (L1), or those appropriate for the L2. Two word reconstruction experiments were carried out in English and Mandarin Chinese. L1 and L2 speakers of English demonstrated a consonantal bias by changing English vowels faster than consonants. L1 and L2 speakers of Mandarin demonstrated a vocalic bias by changing Mandarin consonants faster than vowels. Even relatively late L2 classroom learners whose L1 triggers a consonantal bias (English) exhibited a vocalic bias in their L2 (Mandarin). Lexically related processing biases are thus determined by the phonological and lexical characteristics of the stimuli being processed and not solely by listeners’ L1.

Keywords

consonantsvowelslexiconphonological biassecond language acquisition

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 119 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baayen, RH, Davidson, DJ and Bates, DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 390–412.Google Scholar
Babjack, DL, Cernicky, B, Sobotka, AJ, Basler, L, Struthers, D, Kisic, R, Barone, K and Zuccolotto, AP (2015) Reducing audio stimulus presentation latencies across studies, laboratories, and hardware and operating system configurations. Behavior Research Methods 47(3), 649–665.Google Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.Google Scholar
Barr, DJ, Levy, R, Scheepers, C and Tily, HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3), 255–278.Google Scholar
Basbøll, H (2005) The phonology of Danish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonatti, LL, Peña, M, Nespor, M and Mehler, J (2005) Linguistic constraints on statistical computations the role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science 16, 451–459.Google Scholar
Bonatti, LL, Peña, M, Nespor, M and Mehler, J (2007) On consonants, vowels, chickens, and eggs. Psychological Science 18(10), 924–925.Google Scholar
Bosch, L and Sebastián-Gallès, N (2003) Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech 46, 217–243.Google Scholar
Bouchon, C, Floccia, C, Fux, T, Adda-Decker, M and Nazzi, T (2015) Call me Alix, not Elix: vowels are more important than consonants in own-name recognition at 5 months. Developmental Science 18(4), 587–598.Google Scholar
Cai, Q and Brysbaert, M (2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS one 5(6), e10729.Google Scholar
Chang, CB (2012) Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first- language speech production. Journal of Phonetics 40(2), 249–268.Google Scholar
Chang, CB (2013) A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics 41(6), 520–533.Google Scholar
Connine, CM, Blasko, DG and Titone, D (1993) Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language 32, 193–210.Google Scholar
Connine, CM, Blasko, DG and Wang, J (1994) Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 624–636.Google Scholar
Creel, SC, Aslin, RN and Tanenhaus, MK (2006) Acquiring an artificial lexicon: Segment type and order information in early lexical entries. Journal of Memory and Language 54, 1–19.Google Scholar
Cutler, A (2012) Native listening. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A and Otake, T (2002) Rhythmic categories in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 46(2), 296–322.Google Scholar
Cutler, A, Sebastián-Gallés, N, Soler-Vilageliu, O and van Ooijen, B (2000) Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons. Memory & Cognition 28, 746–755.Google Scholar
DeFrancis, J (1986) The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R (2010) Monitoring processes in Spanish as a second language during a study abroad program. Foreign Language Annals 43(1), 80–92.Google Scholar
Delle Luche, C., Poltrock, S, Goslin, J, New, B, Floccia, C and Nazzi, T (2014) Differential processing of consonants and vowels in the auditory modality: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Memory and Language 72, 1–15.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S (2007) The Phonology of Standard Chinese. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S (2009) Syllable Structure: The Limits of Variation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flege, JE (1991) Perception and production: The relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning. In Heubner, T & Ferguson, C (eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories pp. 249–289. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Flege, JE (1995) Second-language Speech Learning: Theory, Findings, and Problems. In Strange, W (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language research pp. 229–27. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, JE (2007) Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. Laboratory Phonology 9, 353–382.Google Scholar
Flege, JE, Yeni-Komshian, GH and Liu, S (1999) Age constraints on second- language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41(1), 78–104.Google Scholar
Floccia, C, Nazzi, T, Delle Luche, C, Poltrock, S and Goslin, J (2014) English-learning one-to two-year-olds do not show a consonant bias in word learning. Journal of Child Language 41(5), 1085–1114.Google Scholar
Fu, QJ, Zeng, FG, Shannon, RV and Soli, SD (1998) Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104, 505–510.Google Scholar
Gandour, J (1983) Tone perception in far eastern-languages. Journal of Phonetics 11(2), 149–175.Google Scholar
Gómez, DM, Mok, P, Ordin, M, Mehler, J and Nespor, M (2018) Statistical speech segmentation in tone languages: The role of lexical tones. Language and Speech 61(1), 84–96.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N (1998) Danish: illustrations of the IPA. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 28, 99–105.Google Scholar
Havy, M, Bouchon, C and Nazzi, T (2016) Phonetic processing when learning words: The case of bilingual infants. International Journal of Behavioral Development 40(1), 41–52.Google Scholar
Havy, M and Nazzi, T (2009) Better processing of consonantal over vocalic information in word learning at 16 months of age. Infancy 14, 439–456.Google Scholar
Havy, M, Serres, J and Nazzi, T (2014) A consonant/vowel asymmetry in word-form processing: Evidence in childhood and in adulthood. Language and Speech 57(2), 254–281.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A, Li, P and MacWhinney, B (2005) The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(5), 220–225.Google Scholar
Ho, AT (1976) The acoustic variation of Mandarin tones. Phonetica 33, 353–367.Google Scholar
Hochmann, JR, Benavides-Varela, S, Nespor, M and Mehler, J (2011) Consonants and vowels: Different roles in early language acquisition. Developmental Science 14, 1445–1458.Google Scholar
Højen, A and Nazzi, T (2016) Vowel bias in Danish word-learning: processing biases are language-specific. Developmental Science 19(1), 41–49.Google Scholar
Keidel, JL, Jenison, RL, Kluender, KR and Seidenberg, MS (2007) Does grammar constrain statistical learning? Commentary on Bonatti, Peña, Nespor, and Mehler (2005). Psychological Science 18 (10), 922–923.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB and Christensen, RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13).Google Scholar
Lee, L and Nusbaum, HC (1993) Processing interactions between segmental and suprasegmental information in native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 53, 157–165.Google Scholar
Lenth, RV (2016) Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software 69, 1–33.Google Scholar
Linck, JA, Kroll, JF and Sunderman, G (2009) Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science 20(12), 1507–1515.Google Scholar
Mani, N and Plunkett, K (2010) Twelve-month-olds know their cups from their keps and tups. Infancy 15(5), 445–470.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B (2005) A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, J & De Groot, A. (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches pp. 49–67. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malins, JG and Joanisse, MF (2010) The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 64, 407–420.Google Scholar
Malins, JG and Joanisse, MF (2012) Setting the tone: An ERP investigation of the influences of phonological similarity on spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Neuropsychologia 50, 2032–2043.Google Scholar
Marks, EA, Moates, DR, Bond, ZS and Stockmal, V (2002) Word reconstruction and consonant features in English and Spanish. Linguistics 40, 421–438.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, WD (1990) Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In Altmann, GTM (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives pp. 148–172. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W and Zwitserlood, P (1989) Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15, 576–585.Google Scholar
Matuschek, H, Kliegl, R, Vasishth, S, Baayen, H and Bates, D (2017) Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 94, 305–315.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, I (2010) Vowel intelligibility in Chinese. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 18, 117–125.Google Scholar
McQueen, JM, Norris, DG and Cutler, A (1994) Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 20, 621–638.Google Scholar
McQueen, JM, Norris, DG and Cutler, A (1999) Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 25, 1363–1389.Google Scholar
Mehler, J, Dommergues, JY, Frauenfelder, U and Segui, J (1981) The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 298–305.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T (2005) Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition 98, 13–30.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T and Bertoncini, J (2009) Phonetic specificity in early lexical acquisition: New evidence from consonants in coda positions. Language and Speech 52(4), 463–480.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T and Cutler, A (2019) How Consonants and Vowels Shape Spoken-Language Recognition. Annual Review of Linguistics 5(1), 25–47.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T, Floccia, C, Moquet, B and Butler, J (2009) Bias for consonantal information over vocalic information in 30-month-olds: Cross-linguistic evidence from French and English. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102(4), 522–537.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T and Poltrock, S (2016) Consonant bias in the use of phonological information during lexical processing: A lifespan and cross-linguistic perspective. In Gaskell, MG and Mirkovic, J, J, (Eds.), Speech perception and spoken word recognition pp. 37–54. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T, Poltrock, S and Von Holzen, K (2016) The developmental origins of the consonant bias in lexical processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 25(4), 291–296.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T and New, B (2007) Beyond stop consonants: Consonantal specificity in early lexical acquisition. Cognitive Development 22(2), 271–279.Google Scholar
Nespor, M, Peña, M and Mehler, J (2003) On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e linguaggio 2, 203–230.Google Scholar
New, B, Araùjo, V and Nazzi, T (2008) Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science 19, 1223–1227.Google Scholar
Nishibayashi, LL and Nazzi, T (2016) Vowels, then consonants: Early bias switch in recognizing segmented word forms. Cognition 155, 188–203.Google Scholar
Packard, JL (2000) The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perani, D, Paulesu, E, Galles, NS, Dupoux, E, Dehaene, S, Bettinardi, V, Cappa, SF, Fazio, F and Mehler, J (1998) The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain: A journal of neurology 121(10), 1841–1852.Google Scholar
Pharao, N (2011) Plosive reduction at the group level and in the individual speaker. Paper presented at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences XVII 2011, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Poltrock, S, Chen, H, Kwok, C, Cheung, H and Nazzi, T (2018) Adult Learning of Novel Words in a Non-native Language: Consonants, Vowels, and Tones. Frontiers in psychology 9.Google Scholar
Poltrock, S and Nazzi, T (2015) Consonant/vowel asymmetry in early word form recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 131, 135–148.Google Scholar
Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. (2012) Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com.Google Scholar
Quené, H and Van den Bergh, H (2008) Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 413–425.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Repp, BH and Lin, H-B (1990) Integration of segmental and tonal information in speech perception: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Phonetics 18, 481–495.Google Scholar
Samuel, AG (2011) Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology 62, 49–72.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallès, N, Echeverria, S and Bosch, L (2005) The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language 52, 240–255.Google Scholar
Sharp, DJ, Scott, SK, Cutler, A and Wise, RJ (2005) Lexical retrieval constrained by sound structure: The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus. Brain and Language 92(3), 309–319.Google Scholar
Shen, G and Froud, K (2016) Categorical perception of lexical tones by English learners of Mandarin Chinese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140(6), 4396–4403.Google Scholar
Shillcock, RC (1990) Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech. In Altmann, GTM (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives pp. 24–49. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Silverberg, S and Samuel, AG (2004) The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3), 381–398.Google Scholar
Singh, L, Goh, HH and Wewalaarachchi, TD (2015) Spoken word recognition in early childhood: comparative effects of vowel, consonant and lexical tone variation. Cognition 142, 1–11.Google Scholar
Sunderman, G and Kroll, JF (2009) When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics 30(1), 79–99.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N, Michael, EB and Kroll, JF (2004) The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(3), 255–272.Google Scholar
Tong, Y, Francis, AL and Gandour, JT (2008) Processing dependencies between segmental and suprasegmental features in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 23, 698–708.Google Scholar
Toro, JM, Nespor, M, Mehler, J and Bonatti, LL (2008a) Finding words and rules in a speech stream: functional differences between vowels and consonants. Psychological Science 19 (2), 137–144.Google Scholar
Toro, JM, Shukla, M, Nespor, M and Endress, AD (2008b) The quest for generalizations over consonants: asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences. Perception & Psychophysics 70 (8), 1515–1525.Google Scholar
van Ooijen, B (1996) Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: Evidence from a word reconstruction task. Memory & Cognition 24, 573–583.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, MS and Luce, PA (1998) When words compete: levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science 9, 325–329.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, MS and Luce, PA (1999) Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 374–408.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Sereno, JA, Jongman, A and Hirsch, J (2003) fMRI evidence for cortical modification during learning of Mandarin lexical tone. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15(7), 1019–1027.Google Scholar
Wewalaarachchi, TD, Wong, LH and Singh, L (2017) Vowels, consonants, and lexical tones: Sensitivity to phonological variation in monolingual Mandarin and bilingual English–Mandarin toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 159, 16–33.Google Scholar
Wiener, S and Ito, K (2015) Do syllable-specific tonal probabilities guide lexical access? Evidence from Mandarin, Shanghai and Cantonese speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30, 1048–1060.Google Scholar
Wiener, S and Turnbull, R (2016) Constraints of tones, vowels and consonants on lexical selection in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Speech 59, 59–82.Google Scholar
Xu, Y (1999) Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics 27, 55–105.Google Scholar
Yip, M (2002) Tone. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeng, B and Mattys, SL (2017) Separability of tones and rhymes in Chinese speech perception: Evidence from perceptual migrations. Language and Speech 60(4), 562–570.Google Scholar
Zhao, J, Guo, J, Zhou, F and Shu, H (2011) Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: Evidence from ERP analyes. Neuropsychologia 49, 1761–1770.Google Scholar
Zhou, X and Marslen-Wilson, W (1994) Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 9, 393–422.Google Scholar
Zhou, X and Marslen-Wilson, W (1995) Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 545–600.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wiener et al. supplementary material

Wiener et al. supplementary material 1

Download Wiener et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 316.8 KB