Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T10:15:26.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying texts in a second language: No disadvantage in long-term recognition memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2017

HELEEN VANDER BEKEN ,
EVY WOUMANS  and
MARC BRYSBAERT
HELEEN VANDER BEKEN*
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium
EVY WOUMANS
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium
MARC BRYSBAERT
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium
*
Address for correspondence: Heleen Vander Beken, Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Genr, Belgiumheleen.vanderbeken@ugent.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite an increase in bilingualism and the use of English as a medium of instruction, little research has been done on bilingual memory for learnt information. In a previous study, we found an L2 recall cost but equal recognition performance in L2 versus L1 when students studied short expository texts (Vander Beken & Brysbaert, 2017). In this paper, we investigate whether there is a recognition cost after a longer delay, which would indicate that the memory trace is weaker in L2. Results showed equal performance in L1 and L2, suggesting that the recall cost is either located at the production level, or that the levels-of-processing effect is mediated by language, with unaffected surface encoding leading to effective marginal knowledge on the one hand, and hampered deep encoding leading to ineffective (uncued) recall. This paper also contains the Dutch vocabulary test we used for native speakers.

Keywords

bilingualismlearning from textlong-term memorylevels-of-processing effect
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 21 , Special Issue 4: Recent developments in child bilingualism: Cross-linguistic influence, incomplete acquisition, critical periods and the advantages of bilingualism , August 2018 , pp. 826 - 838
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*This study was supported by a GOA grant from the Research Council of Ghent University (LEMMA Project).

References

Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93 (2), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singman, H., & Dai, B. (2014). Package “lme4”: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using “Eigen” and S4.Google Scholar
Berger, S. A., Hall, L. K., & Bahrick, H. P. (1999). Stabilizing access to marginal and submarginal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5 (4), 438–447.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (2011). Basic statistics for psychologists. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, A. D., Eslick, A. N., Marsh, E. J., Bjork, R. a., & Bjork, E. L. (2014). Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 43, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0462-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11 (6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M. S. (2002). Bilingual lexical memory: Towards a psycholinguistic model of adult l2 lexical acquisition, representation, and processing (Doctoral dissertation): The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Francis, W. S., & Gutiérrez, M. (2012). Bilingual recognition memory: Stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language. Memory & Cognition, 40 (3), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0163-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 9, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58 (3), 787–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, H. M., Bredahl, L. C., Clay, J., Ferrie, J., Groves, J. E., Mcdorman, T. A., & Dark, V. J. (1998). Context-Dependent Memory for Meaningful Material: Information for Students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 617–623.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, D. F., & Altarriba, J. (2014). False Memories in Bilingual Speakers. In Heredia, R. R. & Altarriba, J. (Eds.): Foundations of Bilingual Memory. Springer. 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haist, F., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1992). On the Relationship Between Recall and Recognition Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18 (4), 691–702.Google ScholarPubMed
Hardt, O., Nader, K., & Nadel, L. (2013). Decay happens: The role of active forgetting in memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17 (3), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, B. J., Mcveigh, N. D., Marful, A., & Anderson, M. C. (2007). Inhibiting Your Native Language: The Role of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting During Second-Language Acquisition. Psychological Science, 18 (1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01844.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (August), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marian, V., & Fausey, C. M. (2006). Language-dependent memory in bilingual learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1025–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Neisser, U. (2000). Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129 (3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.129.3.361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, E. J., Roediger, H. L. I., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2007). The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14 (2), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194051CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, A., & Stanny, C. (2006). Language-dependent access to autobiographical memory in Japanese-English bilinguals and US monolinguals. Memory (Hove, England), 14 (3), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210500365763CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, J. (2011). Desirable Dificulties and Studying in the Region of Proximal Learning. In Benjamin, A. S. (Ed.), Successful Remembering and Successful Forgetting: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 1–27). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nadel, L., & Hardt, O. (2011). Update on Memory Systems and Processes. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36 (1), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. JALT, 31 (7), 9–12.Google Scholar
Nott, C. R., & Lambert, W. E. (1968). Free Recall of Bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, (7), 1065–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2015). R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17 (3), 249–55. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runnqvist, E., & Costa, A. (2012). Is retrieval-induced forgetting behind the bilingual disadvantage in word production? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15 (2), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, T. C., Gollan, T. H., Ferreira, V. S., & Salmon, D. P. (2010). What causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency? The dual-task analogy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (132), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1972). Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology, 3 (4), 552–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90022-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1980). Language and memory. Cognitive Science, 4, 243–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(80)80004-8Google Scholar
Schrauf, R. W., & Rubin, D. C. (1998). Bilingual Autobiographical Memory in Older Adult Immigrants: A Test of Cognitive Explanations of the Reminiscence Bump and the Linguistic Encoding of Memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TNS Opinion & Social (2012). Europeans and their Languages. Special Eurobarometer 386. Brussels: European Commissean. ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding Specificity and Retrieval Processes in Episodic Memory. Psychological Review, 80 (5), 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37 (3), 498– 505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Bilingual word recognition in a sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 3 (June), 174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00174Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The Landscape Model of Reading: Inferences and the Online Construction of Memory Representation. In Oostendorp, H. van & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading (p. 404). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vander Beken, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Studying texts in a second language: The importance of test type. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, M. J., & Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1983). On the Nature of Word Recall: Evidence for Linguistic Specificity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 (1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar