Skip to main content Accessibility help

Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing



It has been suggested that bilinguals learn additional languages ‘better’ than monolinguals. However, evidence is sparse, particularly for grammar. We examined behavioral and neural correlates of learning an additional (artificial) language in early Mandarin–English bilinguals, compared to English monolinguals. Following grammar instruction, participants practiced comprehension and production, and judged grammaticality at low and high proficiency while event-related potentials (ERPs) were acquired. Bilinguals and monolinguals did not differ on behavioral measures, but showed distinct ERP patterns. At low proficiency only bilinguals showed a P600, a common ERP correlate of syntactic processing in native speakers of languages. At high proficiency both groups showed P600s, though the monolinguals also evidenced an anterior positivity not typically found in native speakers of languages during syntactic processing. These findings suggest that, even without bilingual/monolingual behavioral differences, bilinguals show ERP patterns for an additional language that are more similar to those of native speakers of languages.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing
      Available formats


Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Sarah Grey, Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, Faber Hall 556, Fordham University, Bronx, NY


Hide All

* This research was supported by NSF-BCS 1124144 to Sarah Grey, Cristina Sanz, and Michael T. Ullman and a Language Learning journal dissertation grant to Sarah Grey. Portions of this research were presented at the annual meetings of the American Association for Applied Linguistics and the Cognitive Neuroscience Society in 2014. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback. We especially thank Janire Zalbidea for assistance with data collection for the bilingual group.



Hide All
Abu-Rabia, S., & Sanitsky, E. (2010). Advantages of bilinguals over monolinguals in learning a third language. Bilingual Research Journal, 33 (2), 173199.
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2015). The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (04), 683695.
Aparicio, X., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., Pu, H., Lavaur, J.-M., & Grainger, J. (2012). Language effects in trilinguals: an ERP study. Frontiers in psychology, 3.
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: an ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 (1), 137153.
Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2012). Language learning and control in monolinguals and bilinguals. Cognitive Science(Early view).
Bartolotti, J., Marian, V., Schroeder, S. R., & Shook, A. (2011). Bilingualism and inhibitory control influence statistical learning of novel word forms. Frontiers in psychology, 2.
Bates, E. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 373). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Batterink, L., & Neville, H. (2013). Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25 (6), 936951.
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19 (2), 290303.
Bowden, H. W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51 (13), 24922511.
Carlson, R. (1994). A grammar of Supyire (Vol. 14). Walter de Gruyter.
Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46, 7186.
Cenoz, J. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7 (1), 7187.
Cenoz, J., & Valencia, J. (1994). Additive trilingualism: Evidence from Basque Country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 197209.
Chee, M. W., Caplan, D., Soon, C. S., Sriram, N., Tan, E. W., Thiel, T., & Weekes, B. (1999). Processing of visually presented sentences in Mandarin and English studied with fMRI. Neuron, 23 (1), 127137.
Chee, M. W., Tan, E. W., & Thiel, T. (1999). Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 19 (8), 30503056.
Chow, W.-Y., & Phillips, C. (2013). No semantic illusions in the “Semantic P600” phenomenon: ERP evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Brain Research, 1506, 7693.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). Grammatical Processing in Language Learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 (1), 342.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006b). How native-like is non-native language proceessing? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10 (12), 564570.
Costa, A., Hernandez, M., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106 (1), 5986.
Cox, J. G. (2017). Explicit instruction, bilingualism, and the older adult learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 2958. doi: 10.1017/S0272263115000364
Cox, J. G., & Sanz, C. (2015). Deconstructing PI for the ages: Explicit instruction vs. practice in young and older adult bilinguals. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53 (2), 225248.
Cummins, J. (1987). Bilingualism, language profiency, and metalinguistic development. In Homel, P., Palif, M., & Aaronson, D. (Eds.) Childhood bilingualism: Aspects of linguistic, cognitive and social development. Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum.
De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or Addiitonal Language Acquisition. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
DeKeyser, R. M. (1996). Exploring automatization processes. Tesol Quarterly, 30 (2), 349357.
DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (02), 195221.
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of neuroscience methods, 134 (1), 921.
De Vincenzi, M., Job, R., Di Matteo, R., Angrilli, A., Penolazzi, B., Ciccarelli, L., & Vespignani, F. (2003). Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations. Brain and language, 85 (2), 280296.
Dillon, A. M. (2009). Metalinguistic awareness and evidence of cross-linguistic influence among bilingual learners in Irish primary schools. Language Awareness, 18 (2), 182197.
Ettlinger, M., Morgan‐Short, K., Faretta‐Stutenberg, M., & Wong, P. (2015). The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12257
Fabbro, F. (1999). The neurolinguistics of bilingualism. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2010). The study of the role of the background languages in third langauge acquisition: The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48 (2/3), 185219.
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 226248.
Frenzel, S., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2011). Conflicts in language processing: A new perspective on the N400–P600 distinction. Neuropsychologia, 49 (3), 574579.
Friederici, A., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002a). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 4563.
Friederici, A. D., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25 (1), 157176.
Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002b). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99 (1), 529534.
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25 (4), 355373.
Gibson, M., Hufeisen, B., & Libben, G. (2001). Learners of German as an L3 and their production of German preposition verbs. In Iragui, J. Cenoz, Hufeisen, B. & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition (pp. 138148). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Gillon Dowens, M., Guo, T., Guo, J., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish–Evidence from Event Related Potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49 (7), 16511659.
Gillon Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (8), 18701887.
Gomez, R. L. (1997). Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 154207.
Gonzalez-Ardeo, J. (2000). Engineering students and ESP in the Basque Country: SLA versus TLA. In Iragui, J. Cenoz, Hufeisen, B. & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Looking beyond second language acquisition: Studies in tri- and multilingualism (pp. 7595). Tubingen: Stauffenberg.
Green, D. W. (2003). Neural basis of the lexicon and the grammar in L2 acquisition. In Hout, R. v., Hulk, A., Kuiken, F. & Towell, R. (Eds.), The interface between syntax and the lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 197208). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grey, S., Tanner, D., & van Hell, J.G. (2017). How right is left? Handedness modulates neural responses during morphosyntactic processing. Brain Research, 1669, 2743.
Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (36), 611645.
Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Individual differences in incidental language learning: Phonological working memory, learning styles, and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 4453.
Guo, T., Ma, F., & Liu, F. (2013). An ERP study of inhibition of non-target languages in trilingual word production. Brain and Language, 127 (1), 1220.
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 123141.
Hama, M., & Leow, R. P. (2010). Learning without awareness revisted: Extending Williams (2005). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 465491.
Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogry and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371375.
Jessner, U. (2008). Teaching third languages: Findings, trends, and challenges. Language Teaching, 41, 1556.
Kaan, E. (2007). Event‐related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1 (6), 571591.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test: Wiley Online Library.
Kaushanskaya, M. (2012). Cognitive mechanisms of word learning in bilingual and monolingual adults: The role of phonological memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (Early View).
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009a). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16 (4), 705710.
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009b). Bilingualism reduces native-language interference during novel-word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 35 (3), 829835.
Kaushanskaya, M., & Rechtzigel, K. (2012). Concreteness effects in bilingual and monolingual word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19 (5), 935941.
Kemp, C. (2007). Strategic processing in grammar learning: Do multilinguals use more strategies? International Journal of Multilingualism, 4, 241261.
Keshavarz, M. H., & Astaneh, H. (2004). The impact of bilinguality on the learning of English vocabulary as a foreign language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7, 297302.
Lado, B. (2016). Aptitude and pedagogical conditions in the early development of a nonprimary language. Applied Psycholinguistics (early view), 123. doi: 10.1017/S0142716416000394.
Lado, B., & Sanz, C. (2016). Methods in multilingualism research. In Research Methods in Language and Education (pp. 120). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_14-1
Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8.
Luck, S. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't). Psychophysiology, 54, 146157.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection Theory: A User's Guide, 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 6990). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and monolinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (940-967).
Martin, C., Strijkers, K., Santesteban, M., Escera, C., Hartsuiker, R., & Costa, A. (2013). The impact of early bilingualism on controlling a language learned late: an ERP study. Frontiers in psychology, 4.
Martín‐Loeches, M., Muñoz, F., Casado, P., Melcon, A., & Fernández‐Frías, C. (2005). Are the anterior negativities to grammatical violations indexing working memory?. Psychophysiology, 42 (5), 508519.
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 703704.
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., Caffarra, S., & Carreiras, M. (2015). On the left anterior negativity (LAN): The case of morphosyntactic agreement. Cortex, 66 (156-159).
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47 (8), 908930.
Morgan-Short, K. (2014). Electrophysiological approaches to understanding second language acquisition: A field reaching its potential. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 1536.
Morgan-Short, K., & Tanner, D. (2014). Event-related potentials (ERPs). Research methods in second language psycholinguistics, 127152.
Morgan-Short, K., Deng, Z., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Wong, P., & Wong, F. C. K. (2015). A view of the neural representation of second language syntax through artificial language learning under implicit contexts of exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37 (02), 383419.
Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Carpenter, H., & Wong, P. (2014). Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (01), 5672.
Morgan-Short, K., Finger, I., Grey, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2012a). Second Language Processing Shows Increased Native-Like Neural Responses after Months of No Exposure. PLoS ONE, 7 (3), e32974.
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2012b). Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (4), 933947.
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60 (1), 154193.
Mueller, J. L., Oberecker, R., & Friederici, A. D. (2009). Syntactic learning by mere exposure: An ERP study in adult learners. BMC Neuroscience, 10 (89).
Nation, R., & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Novices and Experts: An Information Processing Approach to the “Good Language Learner” Problem. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7 (1), 4155.
Nayak, N., Hansen, N., Krueger, N., & McLaughlin, B. (1990). Language-learning strategies in monolingual and multilingual adults. Language Learning, 40 (2), 221244.
Okita, Y., & Jun Hai, G. (2001). Learning of Japanese Kanjii characters by bilingual and monolingual chinese speakers. In Iragui, J. Cenoz, Hufeisen, B. & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Looking beyond second language acquisition: Studies in tri- and multilingualism (pp. 6373). Tubingen: Stauffenburg.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9 (1), 97113.
Opitz, B., & Friederici, A. (2002). Artificial language acquisition: Changes in brain activity during the course of learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Supplement, 35.
Osterhout, L., Kim, A., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. In Spivey, M., Joannissee, M. & McCrae, K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 365389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34 (6), 739773.
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66 (2), 232258.
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages (Vol. 40): John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 21282148.
Rah, A. (2010). Transfer in L3 sentence processing: evidence from relative clause attachment amibuities. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 147161.
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855863.
Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 115119.
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33 (4), 829856.
Roehm, D., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Rösler, F., & Schlesewsky, M. (2007). To predict or not to predict: Influences of task and strategy on the processing of semantic relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 (8), 12591274.
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 (12), 20302048.
Rossi, S., Hartmüller, T., Vignotto, M., & Obrig, H. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for modulation of lexical processing after repetitive exposure to foreign phonotactic rules. Brain and Language, 127 (3), 404414.
Rothman, J., Iverson, M., & Judy, T. (2011). Introduction: Some notes on the generative study of L3 acquisition. Second Language Research, 27 (1), 519.
Safont Jorda, M. P. (2003). Metapragmatic awareness and pragmatic production of third language learners of English: A focus on request acts realizations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7 (1), 4368.
Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 2344.
Sanz, C. (2007). The role of bilingual literacy in the acquisition of a third language. In Perez-Vidal, C., Bel, A. & Gauau, M. J. (Eds.), A Portrait of the Young in the New Multilingual Spain (pp. 220240). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Sanz, C., & Lado, B. (2008). Third language acquisition research methods. In King, K. & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd Edition ed., Vol. 10, pp. 33143336): Springer: US.
Sanz, C., Park, H. I., & Lado, B. (2015). A functional approach to cross-linguistic influence in ab initio L3 acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (02), 236251.
Stafford, C. A. (2011). Bilingualism and enhanced attention in early adulthood. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14 (1), 122.
Stafford, C. A., Bowden, H. W., & Sanz, C. (2012). Optimizing language instruction: Matters of explicitness, practice, and cue learning. Language Learning, 62 (3), 741768.
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31 (1), 137149.
Steinhauer, K. (2014). Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: a brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2. Applied Linguistics, 35, 393417.
Steinhauer, K., & Drury, J. E. (2012). On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies. Brain and language, 120 (2), 135162.
Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., & Drury, J. E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25 (1), 1341.
Steinhauer, K., & Connolly, J. F. (2008). Event-related potentials in the study of language. In Whitaker, H. (Ed.) Concise Encyclopedia of Brain and Language (pp. 91104). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
Tagarelli, K. M. (2014). The neurocognition of adult second language learning: An fMRI study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Tanner, D. (2015). On the left anterior negativity (LAN) in electrophysiological studies of morphosyntactic agreement. Cortex, 66(149155).
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (2014). Brain-based individual differences in on-line L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 277293.
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (2), 367382.
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289301.
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. SSLA, 27 (2), 173204.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4 (1), 105122.
Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (Ed.), Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory and Practice (pp. 141178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Ullman, M.T. (2015). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In VanPatten, B. and Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 135158.
van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H. H. J., Vissers, C. T. W. M., & Chwilla, D. J. (2010). Monitoring in language perception: mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (1), 6782.
Van Den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2004). The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 (6), 10681084.
Van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26 (1), 4374.
Wang, T., & Saffran, J. R. (2014). Statistical learning of a tonal language: the influence of bilingualism and previous linguistic experience. Frontiers in psychology, 5.
White, E. J., Genesee, F., & Steinhauer, K. (2012). Brain responses before and after intensive second language learning: Proficiency based changes in language background effects in adult learning. PLoS ONE, 7 (12), e52318.
Wickens, T. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269304.
Zare, M., & Mobarakeh, S. D. (2013). Effects of bilingualism on L3 vocabulary learning among Iranian EFL learners. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 13 (1), 127138.
Zhou, X., Ye, Z., Cheung, H., & Chen, H.-C. (2009). Processing the Chinese language: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (7-8), 929946.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.