Skip to main content
×
Home

A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension*

  • AINE ITO (a1) (a2), MARTIN CORLEY (a1) and MARTIN J. PICKERING (a1)
Abstract

We used the visual world eye-tracking paradigm to investigate the effects of cognitive load on predictive eye movements in L1 (Experiment 1) and L2 (Experiment 2) speakers. Participants listened to sentences whose verb was predictive or non-predictive towards one of four objects they were viewing. They then clicked on a mentioned object. Half the participants additionally performed a working memory task of remembering words. Both L1 and L2 speakers looked more at the target object predictively in predictable- than in non-predictable sentences when they performed the listen-and-click task only. However, this predictability effect was delayed in those who performed the concurrent memory task. This pattern of results was similar in L1 and L2 speakers. L1 and L2 speakers make predictions, but cognitive resources are required for making predictive eye movements. The findings are compatible with the claim that L2 speakers use the same mechanisms as L1 speakers to make predictions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension*
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Aine Ito, Faculty of Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Institute, Walton Street, Oxford, OX1 2HG, United Kingdom aine.ito@ling-phil.ox.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All
*

We would like to thank Madeleine Beveridge for help creating and recording the stimuli.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Altmann G. T. M., & Kamide Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73 (3), 247264.
Baayen H. R., Davidson D. J., & Bates D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 390412.
Baayen H. R., Piepenbrock R., & Gulikers L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA.
Baddeley A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (11), 417423.
Baddeley A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63 (1), 129.
Barr D. J. (2008). Analyzing “visual world” eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 457474.
Bates D. M., Maechler M., & Dai B. (2008). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes.
Borovsky A., Elman J. L., & Fernald A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112 (4), 417436.
Brysbaert M., Warriner A. B., & Kuperman V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46 (3), 904–11.
Chambers C. G., & Cooke H. (2009). Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35 (4), 10291040.
Chambers C. G., Tanenhaus M. K., & Magnuson J. S. (2004). Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30 (3), 687696.
Dahan D., & Tanenhaus M. K. (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30 (2), 498513.
Dell G. S., & Chang F. (2014). The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 20120394.
Dijkgraaf A., Hartsuiker R. J., & Duyck W. (2016). Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/S1366728916000547
Ellis E. M., Borovsky A., Elman J. L., & Evans J. L. (2015). Novel word learning: An eye-tracking study. Are 18-month-old late talkers really different from their typical peers? Journal of Communication Disorders, 58, 43157.
Ferretti T. R., McRae K., & Hatherell A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (4), 516547.
Gordon P. C., Hendrick R., & Levine W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society / APS, 13 (5), 425430.
Huettig F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118135.
Huettig F., & Altmann G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96 (1), 2332.
Huettig F., & Janse E. (2016). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31 (1), 8093.
Huettig F., Olivers C. N. L., & Hartsuiker R. J. (2011). Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 137 (2), 138150.
Huettig F., Rommers J., & Meyer A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137 (2), 151171.
Ito A., Corley M., Pickering M. J., Martin A. E., & Nieuwland M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157171.
Ito A., Martin A. E., & Nieuwland M. S. (2016). On predicting form and meaning in a second language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000315.
Kaan E. (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4 (2), 257282.
Kamide Y., Altmann G. T. M., & Haywood S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49 (1), 133156.
Kamide Y., Scheepers C., & Altmann G. T. M. (2003). Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive procesing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32 (1), 3755.
Knoeferle P., Crocker M. W., Scheepers C., & Pickering M. J. (2005). The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95 (1), 95127.
Kukona A., Fang S. Y., Aicher K. A., Chen H., & Magnuson J. S. (2011). The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Cognition, 119 (1), 2342.
Kuperberg G. R., & Jaeger T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language Cognition & Neuroscience, 31 (1), 3259.
Kuperman V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez H., & Brysbaert M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44 (4), 978990.
Landauer T. K., & Dumais S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104 (2), 211240.
Mani N., & Huettig F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake—But only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38 (4), 843847.
Martin C. D., Thierry G., Kuipers J. R., Boutonnet B., Foucart A., & Costa A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69 (4), 574588.
Mitsugi S., & MacWhinney B. (2016). The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19 (1), 1935.
Nation K., Marshall C. M., & Altmann G. T. M. (2003). Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86 (4), 314329.
Otten M., & Van Berkum J. J. A. (2008). Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: Prediction or priming? Discourse Processes, 45 (6), 464496.
Pickering M. J., & Garrod S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (3), 105110.
Pickering M. J., & Garrod S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329392.
Development Core Team R. (2015). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Saslow M. G. (1967). Latency of saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57 (8), 10301033.
Segalowitz N., & Hulstijn J. H. (2009). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In Kroll J. F. & De Groot A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches (pp. 371–388). New York: Oxford University Press.
Slevc L. R., & Novick J. M. (2013). Memory and cognitive control in an integrated theory of language processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (4), 373–4.
Tanenhaus M. K., Magnuson J. S., Dahan D., & Chambers C. (2000). Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29 (6), 557580.
Van Overschelde J. P., Rawson K. A., & Dunlosky J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 (3), 289335.
Yee E., & Sedivy J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 (1), 114.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1366-7289
  • EISSN: 1469-1841
  • URL: /core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 178 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 473 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th March 2017 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.