Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

English orthographic forms affect L2 English speech production in native users of a non-alphabetic writing system

  • Mirjana Sokolović-Perović (a1), Bene Bassetti (a2) and Susannah Dillon (a3)

Abstract

There is growing evidence that the orthographic forms (spellings) of second language words affect second language (L2) speech production, but it is not known whether orthography affects L2 phonology in native users of a non-alphabetic writing system. To answer this question, this study tested the effects of number of letters on the duration of consonants and vowels in the EnglishL2 speech production of Japanese–English sequential bilinguals. JapaneseL1–EnglishL2 bilinguals and English native speakers (both n = 16) performed a delayed word repetition task, producing 16 English word pairs in which the same consonant or vowel was spelled either with a single letter or with double letters, as in city-kitty. The bilinguals produced the same English sound as longer or shorter depending on the number of letters in its spelling, confirming that L2 orthographic forms affect L2 speakers’ phonological representations of L2 words even when their L1 writing system is not alphabetical.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      English orthographic forms affect L2 English speech production in native users of a non-alphabetic writing system
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      English orthographic forms affect L2 English speech production in native users of a non-alphabetic writing system
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      English orthographic forms affect L2 English speech production in native users of a non-alphabetic writing system
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Dr Mirjana Sokolović-Perović, E-mail: m.sokolovic@reading.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Aoyama, K, Flege, JE, Guion, S, Akahane-Yamada, R and Yamada, T (2004) Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233250.
Barr, DJ, Levy, R, Scheepers, C and Tily, HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255278.
Bassetti, B (2007) Effects of hanyu pinyin on pronunciation in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In Guder, A, Jiang, X and Wan, Y (eds), The congnition, learning and teaching of Chinese characters, Beijing, China: Beijing Language and Culture University Press, pp. 155179.
Bassetti, B (2008) Orthographic input and second language phonology. In Piske, T and Young-Scholten, M (eds), Input matters in SLA, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 191206.
Bassetti, B (2017) Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 18351842. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000417
Bassetti, B and Atkinson, N (2015) Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 6791. doi: 10.1017/S0142716414000435
Bassetti, B, Escudero, P and Hayes-Harb, R (2015) Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input. In Hayes-Harb, R, Bassetti, B and Escudero, P (eds), Orthographic effects in second langauge phonology, Special Issue. Applied Psycholinguistics (Vol. 36, pp. 16).
Bassetti, B, Sokolović-Perović, M, Mairano, P and Cerni, T (2018) Orthography-induced length contrasts in the second language phonological systems of L2 speakers of English: Evidence from minimal pairs. Language and Speech, 61, 577597, doi: 10.1177/0023830918780141.
Boersma, P and Weenink, D (2012) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program], Version 5.3.13 (retrieved April 11, 2012 from http://www.praat.org/).
Brown, CA (1998) The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14, 136193.
Carney, E (1994) A survey of English spelling, Oxford: Routledge.
Clark, J and Yallop, C (1995) An introduction to phonetics and phonology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Cohen, J, MacWhinney, B, Flatt, M and Provost, J (1993) PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 257271.
Cook, VJ (2002) Background to the L2 user. In Cook, VJ (ed), Portraits of the L2 user, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, (pp. 128).
Coulmas, F (2003) Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, L (2010) Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: Evidence from English and Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 272288.
Detey, S and Nespoulous, JL (2008) Can orthography influence second language syllabic segmentation? Japanese epenthetic vowels and French consonantal clusters. Lingua, 118, 6681. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.04.003
Dupoux, E, Kakehi, K, Hirose, Y, Pallier, C and Mehler, J (1999) Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 15681578.
Erdener, VD and Burnham, DK (2005) The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning, 55, 191228.
Escudero, P (2015) Orthography plays a limited role when learning the phonological forms of new words: The case of Spanish and English learners of novel Dutch words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 722.
Escudero, P, Hayes-Harb, R and Mitterer, H (2008) Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345360.
Escudero, P, Simon, E and Mulak, KE (2014) Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn't always help. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 384395.
Escudero, P and Wanrooij, K (2010) The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech, 53, 343365.
Flege, JE, Munro, MJ and MacKay, IRA (1995) Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 31253134.
Foulkes, P, Docherty, G and Jones, M (2010) Analysing stops. In Di Paolo, M and Yaeger-Dror, M (eds), Sociophonetics: a student's guide, London: Routledge, pp. 5871.
Foulkes, P and Docherty, GJ (2006) The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 409438.
Hayes-Harb, R and Cheng, H.-W (2016) The Influence of the pinyin and zhuyin writing systems on the acquisition of Mandarin word forms by native English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 785.
Hayes-Harb, R, Nicol, J and Barker, J (2010) Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53, 367381.
Hillenbrand. (1995) Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 30993111.
Hirata, Y (2004) Effects of speaking rate on the vowel length distinction in Japanese. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 565589.
Hirata, Y and Tsukada, K (2009) Effects of speaking rate and vowel length on formant frequency displacement in Japanese. Phonetica, 66, 129149.
Hirata, Y and Whiton, J (2005) Effects of speaking rate on the single/geminate stop distinction in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 16471660.
Højsgaard, S and Halekoh, U (2016) doBy: Groupwise Statistics, LSmeans, Linear Contrasts, Utilities. R package version 4.5-15. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=doBy.
Idemaru, K and Guion, SG (2008) Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38, 167186.
Irwin, M (2011) Loanwords in Japanese, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Kawagoe, I (2015) The phonology of sokuon, or geminate obstruents. In Kubozono, H (ed), Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 79119.
Kawahara, S (2015) The phonetics of sokuon, or geminate obstruents. In Kubozono, H (ed), Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 4377.
Keating, PA, Linker, W and Huffman, M (1983) Patterns in allophone distribution for voiced and voiceless stops. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 277290.
Koda, K (2005) Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second-language reading development. In Cook, VJ and Bassetti, B (eds), Second language writing systems, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 311334.
Koda, K (2007) Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57 (Supplement 1), 144.
Kondaurova, MV and Francis, AL (2010) The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: comparison of three training methods. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 569587. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.003
Kubozono, H (2015a) Intoduction to Japanese phonetics and phonology. In Kubozono, H (ed), Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 140.
Kubozono, H (2015b) Loanword phonology. In Kubozono, H (ed), Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 313361.
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB and Christensen, RHB (2016) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
Laburne, L (2012) The phonology of Japanese Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ladefoged, P and Johnson, K (2011) A course in phonetics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage.
Laver, J (1994) Principles of phonetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leung, KKW, Jongman, A, Wang, Y and Sereno, JA (2016) Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140, 4558. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4954737
Muneaux, M and Ziegler, J (2004) Locus of orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Novel insights from the neighbour generation task. Language and cognitive processes, 19, 641660.
Nimz, K (2016) Sound perception and production in a foreign language. Does orthography matter? Universitätsverlag Potsdam, Germany.
Okada, H (1999) Japanese, Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117119.
Okada, T (2005) Spelling errors made by Japanese EFL writers: With reference to errors occurring at the word-initial and the word-final position. In Cook, VJ and Bassetti, B (eds), Second language writing systems, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 164183.
Okada, T (2015) Japanese uses of the English writing system: A case study. In Cook, VJ and Ryan, D (eds), The Routledge Handbook of the English Writing System, Oxford, UK: Routledge, pp. 399415.
Otaka, H (2009) Phonetics and phonology of moras, feet, and geminate consonants in Japanese, Plimouth, UK: University Press of America.
Otake, T (2015) Mora and mora-timing. In Kubozono, H (ed), Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 493523.
Peterson, GE and Barney, HL (1952) Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175184.
Peterson, GE and Lehiste, I (1960) Duration of syllable nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693703.
Piske, T, Flege, JE, MacKay, IRA and Meador, D (2002) The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59, 4971.
Pytlyk, C (2011) Shared orthography: Do shared written symbols influence the perception of L2 sounds? The Modern Language Journal, 95, 541557.
R Core Team. (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org.
Rafat, Y (2016) Orthography-induced transfer in the production of English-speaking learners of Spanish. The Language Learning Journal, 44, 197213.
Rastle, K, McCormick, SF, Bayliss, L and Davis, CJ (2011) Orthography influences the perception and production of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 15881594. doi: 10.1037/a0024833
Roach, P (2004) British English: Received Pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34, 239245.
RStudio Team. (2015) RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio Inc. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com.
Sheldon, A and Strange, W (1982) The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243261.
Showalter, CE (2018) Impact of Cyrillic on native English speakers’ phono-lexical acquisition of Russian. Language and Speech, 61, 565576. doi: 10.1177/0023830918761489.
Showalter, CE and Hayes-Harb, R (2013) Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29, 185200.
Showalter, CE and Hayes-Harb, R (2015) Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 2342.
Simon, E, Chambless, D and Alves, UK (2010) Understanding the role of orthography in the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences, 32, 380394.
Simonchyk, A and Darcy, I (2018) The effect of orthography on the lexical encoding of palatalized consonants in L2 Russian. Language and Speech, 61, 522546. doi: 10.1177/0023830918761490.
Swan, M and Smith, B (eds), (2001) Learner English: A teacher's guide to interference and other problems, Cambridge, UK: CUP.
Taft, M (2006) Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: Evidence from non-rhotic speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 6778.
Tsukada, K (2009a) An acoustic comparison of vowel length contrasts in Arabic, Japanese and Thai: Durational and spectral data. International Journal on Asian Language Processing, 19, 127138.
Tsukada, K (2009b) Durational characteristics of English vowels produced by Japanese and Thai second language (L2) Learners. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 29, 287299.
Turk, A, Nakai, S and Sugahara, M (2006) Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: a practical guide. In Sudhoff, S, Lenertova, D, Meyer, R, Pappert, S, Augurzky, P, Mleinek, I, Richter, N and Schlieser, J (eds), Methods in empirical prosody research, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, pp. 128.
Ueyama, M (2000) Prosodic transfer: An acoustic study of L2 English vs. L2 Japanese, University of California Los Angeles.
Ueyama, M (2003) Duration and Quality in the Production of the Vowel Length Contrast in L2 English and L2 Japanese, Paper presented at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Barcelona.
Vokic, G (2011) When alphabets collide: Alphabetic first-language speakers’ approach to speech production in an alphabetic second language. Second Language Research, 27, 391417.
Wickham, H (2009) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis, New York: Spinger-Verlag. Retrieved from http://ggplot2.org.
Williams, D and Escudero, P (2014) A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136, 27512761. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4896471
Young-Scholten, M (2002) Orthographic input in L2 phonological development. In Burmeister, P, Piske, T and Rohde, A (eds), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honour of Henning Wode, pp. 263279. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Young-Scholten, M and Langer, M (2015) The role of orthographic input in second language German: Evidence from naturalistic adult learners’ production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 93114.
Zampini, ML (1994) The role of native language transfer and task formality in the acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Hispania, 77, 470481.

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Sokolović-Perović et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (277 KB)
277 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed