Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Event conceptualization by early Dutch–German bilinguals: Insights from linguistic and eye-tracking data*

  • MONIQUE FLECKEN (a1)
Abstract

This experimental study investigates event construal by early Dutch–German bilinguals, as reflected in their oral depiction of everyday events shown in video clips. The starting point is the finding that the expression of an aspectual perspective (progressive aspect), and its consequences for event construal, is dependent on the extent to which means are grammaticalized, as in English (e.g., progressive aspect) or not, as in German (von Stutterheim & Carroll, 2006). The present study shows that although speakers of Dutch and German have comparable means to mark this aspectual concept, at a first glance at least, they differ markedly both in the contexts as well as in the extent to which this aspectual perspective is selected, being highly frequent in specific contexts in Dutch, but not in German. The present experimental study investigates factors that lead to the use of progressive aspect by early bilinguals, using video clips (with different types of events varied along specific dimensions on a systematic basis). The study includes recordings of eye movements, and examines how far an aspectual perspective drives allocation of attention during information intake while viewing the stimulus material, both for and while speaking. Although the bilinguals have acquired the means to express progressive aspect in Dutch, their use shows a pattern that differs from monolingual Dutch speakers. Interestingly, these differences are reflected in different patterns in the direction of attention (eye movements) when verbalizing information on events.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Seminar für Deutsch als Fremdsprachenphilologie, University of Heidelberg, Plöck 55, Office 127b, 69117 Heidelberg, Germanyflecken@idf.uni-heidelberg.de
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Research reported on in this article was funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG), through grant STU 131/6-1 to Christiane von Stutterheim (University of Heidelberg). I would like to thank the DFG, as well as Mary Carroll, Christiane von Stutterheim, Barbara Schmiedtová, Pieter Muysken, Scott Jarvis and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ameel, E., Storms, G., Malt, B. C., & van Assche, F. (2009). Semantic convergence in the bilingual lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 270290.
Ameel, E., Storms, G., Malt, B. C., & Sloman, S. A. (2005). How bilinguals solve the naming problem. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 6080.
Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9 (1), 8996.
Athanasopoulos, P., & Kasai, C. (2008). Language and thought in bilinguals: The case of grammatical number and nonverbal classification preferences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 105123.
Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636644.
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. (2001). Producing words: How mind meets mouth. In Wheeldon, L. (ed.), Aspects of language production, pp. 747. Hove: Psychology Press.
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antunano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. (2007). Principles of event segmentation: The case of motion events. Language, 83 (3), 495532.
Boogaart, R. (1991). “Progressive aspect” in Dutch. In Drijkoningen, F. & Kemenade, A. v. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, pp. 19. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Boogaart, R. (1999). Aspect and temporal ordering: A contrastive analysis of Dutch and English. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.
Booij, G. (2008). Constructional idioms as products of linguistic change: The aan het + infinitive construction in Dutch. In Bergs, A. & Diewald, G. (eds.), Constructions and language change, pp. 79104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 122.
Bouhaous, A. (in preparation). Zeitstrukturen im Arabischen. Dissertation, University of Heidelberg.
Butler, Y., & Hakuta, K. (2004). Bilingualism and second language acquisition. In Bhatia, T. & Ritchie, W. (eds.), The handbook of bilingualism, pp. 114145. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bylund, E. (2009). Effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12 (3), 305322.
Cadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, pp. 239275. New York: Spon Press.
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 183216.
Carroll, M., & Lambert, M. (2003). Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Dimroth, C. & Starren, M. (eds.), Information structure and the dynamics of language acquistion, pp. 267287. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Carroll, M., & Lambert, M. (2006). Reorganizing principles of information structure in advanced L2s: A study of French and German learners of English. In Byrnes, H., Weger-Guntharp, H. & Sprang, K. (eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities, pp. 5473. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Carroll, M., Natale, S., & Starren, M. (2008). Acquisition du marquage du progressif par des apprenants germanophones de l'italien et néerlandophones du français. AILE, 26, 3150.
Carroll, M., & Stutterheim, C. von (1993). The representation of spatial configurations in English and German and the grammatical structure of locative and anaphoric expressions. Linguistics, 31 (6). 10111041.
Carroll, M., & Stutterheim, C. von (to appear). Event representation, event-time relations and clause structure: A cross-linguistic study of English and German. In Bohnemeyer, J. & Pederson, E. (eds.), Event representation in language: Encoding events at the language–cognition interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, M., Stutterheim, C. von & Nüse, R. (2004). The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In Habel, C. & Pechmann, T. (eds.), Approaches to language production, pp. 183218. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Ebert, K. (2000). Progressive markers in Germanic languages. In Dahl, Ö. (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, pp. 605653. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Flecken, M. (2008). Motion event construal in L1 Dutch: A pilot study. Unpublished data corpus.
Flecken, M. (2009). Event conceptualization by early bilinguals. Paper presented at ISB7, Utrecht.
Flecken, M. (in press a). Macroplanning in narratives: Assessing bilingual attainment. International Journal of Bilingualism.
Flecken, M. (in press b). What native speaker judgements tell us about the grammaticalization of a progressive aspectual marker in Dutch. Linguistics.
Griffin, Z. (2004). Why look? Reasons for eye movements related to language production. In Henderson, J. & Ferreira, F. (eds.), The integration of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world, pp. 213247. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Grosjean, F. (1985). The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker–hearer. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6, 467477.
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilingualism: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131149.
Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2003). Language Background Questionnaire. Developed in The Dynamics of Multilingual Processing. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Hartsuiker, R., Pickering, M., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish–English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15 (6), 409414.
Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish–English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9 (3), 249261.
Ierland, S. van (2009). Grammatical features influencing information structure: The case of L1 and L2 Dutch and English. LOT dissertation series 245.
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge.
Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London: Routledge.
König, E., & Auwera van der, J. (2002). The Germanic languages. London: Routledge.
Krause, O. (2002). Progressive Verbalkonstruktionen im Deutschen: Ein korpusbasierter Sprachvergleich mit dem Niederländischen und dem Englischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Leclerq, Pascale (2008). L'influence de la langue maternelle chez les apprenants adultes quasi-bilingues dans une tâche contrainte de verbalisation. AILE, 26, 5170.
Lemmens, M. (2005). Aspectual posture verb constructions in Dutch. Journal of Germanic linguistics, 17, 183217.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. (2002). A theory of lexical access in speech production. In Altmann, G. T. M. (ed.), Psycholinguistics, pp. 278377. London: Routledge.
Li, P., Sepanski, S., & Zhao, X. (2006). Language history questionnaire: A Web-based interface for bilingual research. Behaviour Research Methods, 2, 202210.
Marian, V., Blumfeld, H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q). Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50 (4), 940967.
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97115.
Meisel, J. (2004). The bilingual child. In Bhatia, T. & Ritchie, W. (eds.), The handbook of bilingualism, pp. 91113. Oxford: Blackwell.
Natale, S. (2009). Gebrauchsdeterminanten der verbalperiphrase stare + gerundio. Tübingen: Narr (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik).
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155184.
Pavlenko, A. (2003). Eyewitness memory in late bilinguals: Evidence for discursive relativity. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 7 (3), 257281.
Pavlenko, A. (2005) Bilingualism and thought. In De Groot, A. & Kroll, J. (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, pp. 433453. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmiedtová, B., & Sahonenko, N. (2008). Die Rolle des grammatischen Aspekts in Ereignis-Enkodierung: Ein Vergleich zwischen Tschechischen und Russischen Lernern des Deutschen. In Gommes, P. & Walter, M. (eds.), Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten: Korpuslinguistik und Zweitspracherwerbforschung, pp. 4571. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Schmiedtová, B., Stutterheim, C. von & Carroll, M. (in press). Implications of language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced L2 speakers. In Pavlenko, A. (ed.), Naming the world in two languages: Languages and cognition in the bilingual mind. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Slobin, D. (1996). From “thought to language” to “thinking for speaking”. In Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, pp. 7096. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stutterheim, C. von & Carroll, M. (2006). The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In Byrnes, H., Weger-Guntharp, H. & Sprang, K. (eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities, pp. 4053. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Stutterheim, C. von, Carroll, M., & Klein, W. (2009). New perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across languages. In Klein, W. & Li, P. (eds.), The expression of time, pp. 195216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stutterheim, C. von & Lambert, M. (2005). Crosslinguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In Hendriks, H. (ed.), The structure of learner varieties, pp. 203230. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Stutterheim, C. von & Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualisation in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics (Special Issue: Perspectives in language production), 41, 851881.
Stutterheim, C. von, Nüse, R., & Murcia Serra, J. (2002). Cross-linguistic differences in the conceptualisation of events. In Hasselgård, H., Johansson, S., Fabricius-Hansen, C. & Behrens, B. (eds.), Information structure in a cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 179198. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III, pp. 57149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (1988). The relation of grammar to cognition. In Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics, pp. 165205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Book.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66 (2), 143160.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1366-7289
  • EISSN: 1469-1841
  • URL: /core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed