Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

A functional approach to cross-linguistic influence in ab initio L3 acquisition*

  • CRISTINA SANZ (a1), HAE IN PARK (a1) and BEATRIZ LADO (a2)
Abstract

The present study follows the role of the first (L1, English) and second (L2, Japanese or Spanish) languages in ab initio third language (L3, Latin) acquisition. Participants (N = 25) were L2 classroom learners without immersion experience. In order to complement previous generativist studies and to offer a fuller developmental account of how transfer operates at the morphosyntactic level, the Competition Model (CM) was adopted as theoretical framework. Positive changes in overall accuracy and sentence processing patterns in role assignment in L3 Latin show L3 development as largely modulated by the L1, suggesting that higher levels of L2 resonance are necessary for integrated patterns of L1 and L2 cues to emerge.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Cristina Sanz, Department of Spanish and Portuguese, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA sanzc@georgetown.edu
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Initial reports of the data were presented at the 2012 American Association for Applied Linguistics in Boston, USA. The study is part of The Latin Project, developed by Cristina Sanz with Catherine Stafford and Harriet Bowden; funding to Sanz from the Spencer Foundation and Georgetown's Graduate School made it possible. The authors would like to thank Professors Mori and Doak, Sarah Grey, German Zarate, Bill Garr, Ru San Chen, and instructors and colleagues in the Spanish and Portuguese and East Asian Languages Departments at Georgetown University for their help with data collection. We would also like to thank Lourdes Ortega and Rebecca Sachs for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Any remaining errors are exclusively the responsibility of the authors.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Antonova-Ünlü, E., & Sağın-Şimşek, C. (2014). The use of verbal morphology in Turkish as a third language: The case of Russian–English–Turkish trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, doi:1367006914526953. Published online by SAGE, April 2, 2014.
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23, 459484.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies. In Winitz, H. (ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Native and Foreign Language Acquisition, pp. 190214. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, pp. 157193. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds.), pp. 3–73.
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (eds.) (2012). Third language acquisition in adulthood. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Cenoz, J. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 7187.
Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46, 7186.
De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
De Bot, K. (2012). Rethinking multilingual processing: From a static to a dynamic approach. In Amaro, Cabrelli, et al. (eds.), pp. 79–94.
Ellis, N. C. (2006a). The associative-cognitive CREED. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, pp. 7796. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Salience, contingency, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164194.
Ellis, N. C. (2006c). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100121.
Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. C. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, pp. 372405. London: Routledge.
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2010). The bounds of adult language acquisition: Blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 553580.
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2011). Learned attention in adult language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 589624.
Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, R. (1996). The strong continuity hypothesis: Some evidence concerning functional categories in adult L2 acquisition. In Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G. & O’Neil, W. (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition, pp. 6177. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2011). Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research, 27, 5982.
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children's patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 316.
García Mayo, M. P. (2012). Cognitive approaches to L3 acquisition. International Journal of English Studies, 12, 129146.
García Mayo, M. P., & Rothman, J. (2012). L3 morphosyntax in the generative tradition: The initial status and beyond. In Amaro, Cabrelli, et al. (eds.), pp. 9–32.
Hakuta, K. (1981). Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese. Cognition, 9, 197236.
Hakuta, K. (1982). Interaction between particles and word order in the comprehension and production of simple sentences in Japanese children. Developmental Psychology, 18, 6276.
Hakuta, K., & Cancino, H. (1977). Trends in second-language-acquisition research. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 294316.
Hale, W. G., & Buck, C. D. (1903). A Latin grammar. Chicago, IL: Atkinson, Mentzer & Grover.
Harrington, M. (1987). Processing transfer: Language-specific processing strategies as a source of interlanguage variation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 351377.
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22, 269301.
Hernandez, A. E., Bates, E. A., & Avila, L. X. (1994). On-line sentence interpretation in Spanish–English bilinguals: What does it mean to be “in between”? Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 417417.
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge.
Kail, M., & Charvillat, A. (1988). Local and topological processing in sentence comprehension by French and Spanish children. Journal of Child Language, 15, 637662.
Kellerman, E. (1983). Now you see it, now you don’t. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (eds.), Language transfer in language learning, 112134. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 543587.
Kilborn, K. (1989). Sentence processing in a second language: The timing of transfer. Language and Speech, 32, 123.
Kilborn, K., & Ito, T. (1989). Sentence processing strategies in adult bilinguals. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, pp. 257291. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., Stafford, C. A., & Sanz, C. A fine-grained analysis of the effects of more vs. less explicit feedback on language development. Language Teaching Research, doi:10.1177/1362168813510382. Published online by SAGE, November 21, 2013.
Lenet, A. E., Sanz, C., Lado, B., Howard, J. H. Jr., & Howard, D.V. (2011). Aging, pedagogical conditions, and differential success in SLA: An empirical study. In Sanz, C. & Leow, R. P. (eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism, pp. 7384. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Li, P., Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 169169.
Liu, H., Bates, E., & Li, P. (1992). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 451484.
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Task and language learning: Integrating theory and practice, pp. 123167. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Luk, Z. P. S., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural-s, articles, and possessive's. Language Learning, 59, 721754.
MacWhinney, B. (2001). The Competition Model: The input, the context, and the brain. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, pp. 6990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, pp. 4967. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacWhinney, B. (2008). A Unified Model. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. C. (eds.), pp. 341–371.
MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the Unified Model. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 211227. New York: Routledge.
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127150.
Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy. System, 25, 215232.
McDonald, J. L. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 317335.
McDonald, J. L. (1987). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379413.
Morett, L. M., & MacWhinney, B. (2012). Syntactic transfer in English-speaking Spanish learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 132151.
Pak, Y. (1987). Age difference in morpheme acquisition among Korean ESL learners: Acquisition order and acquisition rate. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas.
Ringbom, H. (2007). Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Rothman, J. (2010). On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 245273.
Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27, 107127.
Rothman, J. Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingulism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S136672891300059X. Published online by Cambridge University Press, November 13, 2013.
Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26, 189218.
Sanz, C., Lin, H.-J., Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., & Stafford, C. A. (2009). Concurrent verbalizations, pedagogical conditions, and reactivity: Two CALL studies. Language Learning, 59, 3371.
Schmid, M. S. (2013). First language attrition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4, 117123.
Schwartz, B. (1998). The second language instinct. Lingua, 106, 133160.
Stafford, C. A., Bowden, H. W., & Sanz, C. (2012). Optimizing language instruction: Matters of explicitness, practice, and cue learning. Language Learning, 62, 741768.
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173204.
Treffers-Daller, J., & Sakel, J. (2012). Why transfer is a key aspect of language use and processing in bilinguals and L2-users. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16, 310.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
VanPatten, B. (2005). Processing instruction. In Sanz, C. (ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition, pp. 267281. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19, 295333.
Year, J. (2003). Sentence processing within the Competition Model. TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 3, 127.
Yoshimura, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2010a). Honorifics: A sociocultural verb agreement cue in Japanese sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 551569.
Yoshimura, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2010b). The use of pronominal case in English sentence interpretation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 619633.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1366-7289
  • EISSN: 1469-1841
  • URL: /core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed