Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T00:01:29.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grammar without speech production: The case of Labrador Inuttitut heritage receptive bilinguals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

MARINA SHERKINA-LIEBER ,
ANA T. PEREZ-LEROUX  and
ALANA JOHNS
MARINA SHERKINA-LIEBER*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
ANA T. PEREZ-LEROUX
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
ALANA JOHNS
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Address for correspondence: Marina Sherkina-Lieber, Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 4th floor, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3G3 marina.lieber@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine morphosyntactic knowledge of Labrador Inuttitut by Inuit receptive bilinguals (RBs) – heritage speakers who are capable of comprehension, but produce little or no speech. A grammaticality judgment study suggests that RBs possess sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations, though to a lesser degree than fluent bilinguals. Low-proficiency RBs are sensitive only to the most basic grammatical properties. Case omission is most difficult to detect, but morphemes bearing incorrect features (case oversuppliance, number agreement mismatch) or ordered incorrectly (tense and agreement, tense and negation) are easier, and performance on incorrect ordering of morphemes is near target with the core agreement morpheme for all RBs. While receptive bilinguals show patterns of grammatical deficits, they also demonstrate clear knowledge of the basic properties of word structure in Inuttitut. This has implications both for the psycholinguistics of bilingualism and for language revitalization efforts.

Keywords

receptive bilingualsincomplete acquisitionheritage languageInuktitutLabrador

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 301 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

We would like to thank our participants, and also Rita Andersen, Alice Pilgrim, Regina Saimat, and Katie E. Winters for their expert help with the Inuttitut materials and data; the Nunatsiavut Government and Torngâsok Cultural Centre, especially Catharyn Andersen, for their help with the organization of the study; and also Rena Helms-Park, University of Toronto Psycholinguistic Group, and the audience of RASCAL (Relating Asymmetries in Speech and Comprehension in Acquisition of Language), for discussion, as well as three anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

References

Alanen, R. (1999). Grammaticality judgments and reaction time measurements: A tool for analyzing the use of second language knowledge. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section C: Worldwide, 60 (1).Google Scholar
Allen, S. E. M., Crago, M., & Pesco, D. (2006). The effect of majority language exposure on minority language skills: The case of Inuktitut. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9 (5), 578–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, E. P., & Vago, R. M. (2004). The role of grammaticality judgments in investigating first language attrition. In Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M. & Weilemar, L. (eds.), First language attrition. Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues, pp. 105–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammerlaan, T. (1996). “You get a bit wobbly”. Exploring bilingual lexical retrieval processes in the context of first language attrition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Andersen, C. (2004). Literacy and language revitalization in Labrador Inuttitut. Unpublished ms. Nain: Torngâsok Cultural Centre.Google Scholar
Andersen, C., & Johns, A. (2005). Labrador Inuttitut: Speaking into the future. Etudes/Inuit/Studies, 29 (1–2), 189–205.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1982). Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition. In Lambert, R. D. & Freed, B. F. (eds.), The loss of language skills, pp. 82–118. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. T. (2001). Lexical morphology and verb use in child first language loss: A preliminary case study investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5 (4), 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, T. K., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S. A., & Oh, J. S. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13 (3), 238–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkey, M. (2008). The syntax of negation in Inuktitut. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Bolonyai, A. (2000). “Effective affinities”: Language contact in the abstract lexicon and its structural consequences. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4 (1), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolonyai, A. (2002). Case systems in contact: Syntactic and lexical case in bilingual child language. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 21 (2), 1–35.Google Scholar
Borer, H., & Rohrbacher, B. (2002). Minding the absent: Arguments for the Full Competence Hypothesis. Language Acquisition, 10, 123–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, B. E., & Toribio, A. J. (2006). Intra-system variability and change in nominal and verbal morphology. In Gess, R. S. & Arteaga, D. (eds.), Historical Romance linguistics: Retrospective and perspectives, pp. 305–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cuza, A. (2008). The L2 acquisition and L1 attrition of the interpretation and use of aspectual properties in Spanish among English-speaking L2 learners and long-term Spanish immigrants. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign language learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50 (1), 1–56.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. (1980). Affix ordering in West Greenlandic derivational processes. International Journal of American Linguistics, 46 (4), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Schweisguth, M. A. (2001). A reappraisal of young children's knowledge of grammatical morphemes. In Weissenborn, J. & Hoehle, B. (eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition, pp. 176–188. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
Hagen, A. M., & de Bot, K. (1990). Structural loss and levelling in minority languages and dialects. Sociolinguistica, 4, 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Y. (2000). Grammaticality judgment tests: How reliable and valid are they? Applied Language Learning, 11, 177–204.Google Scholar
Hendriks, P., & Spenader, J. (2006). When production precedes comprehension: An optimization approach to the acquisition of pronouns. Language Acquisition, 13 (4), 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The preferential looking paradigm reveals emerging language comprehension. In McDaniel, D., McKee, C. & Cairns, H. (eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax, pp. 105–124. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hulsen, M. (2000). Language loss and language processing. Three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 434–446.Google Scholar
Johns, A. (2001). An inclination towards accusative. Linguistica Atlantica, 23, 127–144.Google Scholar
Johns, A., & Mazurkewich, I. (2001). The role of the university in the training of native language teachers: Labrador. In Hinton, L. & Hale, K. (eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice, pp. 355–366. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B., Schmid, M. S., Keijzer, M., & Dostert, S. (eds.) (2007). Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2004). The comprehension of words and sentences in two languages. In Bhatia, T. K. & Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The handbook of bilingualism, pp. 169–200. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 12, 255–271.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Paribakht, T. S. (1998). Relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, 48, 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, G. (2000). Incomplete L1 acquisition in the immigrant situation: Yiddish in the United States. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, J. (1991). A crosslinguistic study of language contact and language attrition. In Seliger, H. W. & Vago, R. M. (eds.), First language attrition, pp. 67–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2007). The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 495–514.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2002a). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinction in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2002b). Convergent outcomes in L2 acquisition and L1 loss. In Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M., & Weilemar, L. (eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues, pp. 259–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7 (2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2005). Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research, 21 (3), 199–249.Google Scholar
Pelc, L. A. (2002). L1 lexical, morphological and morphosyntactic attrition in Greek–English bilinguals. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 2002, 62, 9, Mar, 3030-A.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2006a). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2006b). Acquisition of Russian: Uninterrupted and incomplete scenarios. Glossos, 8, 1–64.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2007a). Reaching the end point and stopping midway: Different scenarios in the acquisition of Russian. Russian Linguistics, 31, 157–199.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2007b). A glass half-full? Finding empirical and theoretical value in incompletely acquired languages. Invited talk presented at Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16, May 2007, SUNY at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2008). Relative clauses in heritage Russian: Fossilization or divergent grammar? In Antonenko, A., Bailyn, J. F. & Bethin, C. Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, pp. 333–358. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage languages: In the “wild” and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1 (5), 368–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, J. (2009). The efficacy of anaphoricity in Eskaleut. In Mahieu, M. A. & Tersis, N. (eds.), Variations on polysynthesis: The Eskaleut languages, pp. 97–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schlegel, J. R. (2004). Pennsylvania German overhearers: Living with language maintenance and language loss. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 2005, 65, 11, May, 4249-A.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2002). First language attrition, use and maintenance: The case of German Jews in Anglophone countries. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M., & Weilemar, L. (eds.) (2004) First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmitt, E. (2004). No more reductions! To the problem of evaluation of language attrition data. In Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M., & Weilemar, L. (eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues, pp. 105–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 375–409. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spreng, B. (2001). Little v in Inuktitut: Antipassive revisited. Linguistica Atlantica, 23, 159–194.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/prof/92–594/details/page.cfmLang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=1011035&Geo2=BAND&Code2=10640001&Data=Count&SearchText=Nunatsiavut&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=10&B1=Language&Custom=(accessed January 9, 2010).Google Scholar
Valdes, G. (2000). Spanish for native speakers. AATSP Professional Development Series, Handbook for Teachers K-12. Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
Yip, V. & Matthews, S. (2000). Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese–English bilingual child Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3 (3), 193–208.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sherkina-Lieber Supplementary Appendix

Sherkina-Lieber Supplementary Appendix

Download Sherkina-Lieber Supplementary Appendix(File)
File 33.3 KB