Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:20:26.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual differences in the production of referential expressions: The effect of language proficiency, language exposure and executive function in bilingual and monolingual children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

Ludovica Serratrice Open the ORCID record for Ludovica Serratrice [Opens in a new window]  and
Cécile De Cat
Ludovica Serratrice*
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Cécile De Cat
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
*
Author for correspondence: Ludovica Serratrice, E-mail: l.serratrice@reading.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One hundred and seventy-two English-speaking 5- to 7-year-olds participated in a referential communication task where we manipulated the linguistic mention and the visual presence of a competitor alongside a target referent. Eighty-seven of the children were additionally exposed to a language other than English (bilinguals). We measured children's language proficiency, verbal working memory (WM), cognitive control skills, family SES, and relative amount of cumulative exposure and use of the home language for the bilinguals. Children's use of full Noun Phrases (NPs) to identify a target referent was predicted by the visual presence of a competitor more than by its linguistic mention. Verbal WM and proficiency predicted NP use, while cognitive control skills predicted both the ability to use expressions signalling discourse integration and sensitivity to the presence of a discourse competitor, but not of a visual competitor. Bilingual children were as informative as monolingual children once proficiency was controlled for.

Keywords

referential choiceanaphoraindividual differencescognitive controlgradient bilingualism
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 371 - 386
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, SE (2000) A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics 38(3), 483–521. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.38.3.483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, SEM, Hughes, ME and Skarabela, B (2015) The role of cognitive accessibility in children's referential choice. In Serratrice, L and Allen, SE (eds.) The acquisition of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, SEM and Schröder, H (2003) Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In Du Bois, JW, Kumpf, LE and Ashby, WJ (eds.) Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 301–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A, Garrod, SC and Sanford, AJ (1983) The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 35(3), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, JE (2001) The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation. Discourse Processes 31(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3102_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, JE (2008) Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4), 495–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960801920099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, JE and Griffin, ZM (2007) The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language 56(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, RH (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, P, Jiang, Z and Nicoladis, E (2017) The role of working and short-term memory in predicting receptive vocabulary in monolingual and sequential bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1314445Google Scholar
Bialystok, E (2015) Bilingualism and the Development of Executive Function: The Role of Attention. Child Development Perspectives 9(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E (2017) The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin 143(3), 233–262. 10.1037/bul0000099CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E, Luk, G and Kwan, E (2005) Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: Interactions among languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading 9(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0901_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E and Martin, MM (2004) Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science 7(3), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00351.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E and Shapero, D (2005) Ambiguous benefits: The effect of bilingualism on reversing ambiguous figures. Developmental Science 8(6), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00451.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown-Schmidt, S (2009) The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16(5), 893–900. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.893CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvo, A and Bialystok, E (2014) Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning. Cognition 130(3), 278–288. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, AL, Brooks, P and Tomasello, M (2000) Factors affecting young children's use of pronouns as referring expressions. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 43(6), 1337–1349. 10.1044/jslhr.4306.1337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, SM and Meltzoff, AN (2008) Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science 11(2), 282–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, SE (2017) Exposure and input in bilingual development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, PM (1992) Referential strategies in the narratives of Japanese children. Discourse Processes 15(4), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, PM (2003) Argument Structure in Korean. In Du Bois, JW, Kumpf, LE and Ashby, WJ (eds.) Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function. pp. 81–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, HH (1992) Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Cat, C (2011) Information tracking and encoding in early L1: Linguistic competence vs. cognitive limitations. Journal of Child Language 38(4), 828–860. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500091000036XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Cat, C (2015) The cognitive underpinning of referential abilities. In Serratrice, Land Allen, SEM (eds.) The acquisition of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C, Gusnanto, A and Serratrice, L (2017) Identifying a threshold for the executive function advantage in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000486Google Scholar
De Cat, C and Serratrice, L (under review) Predicting language proficiency in bilingual children.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A (2014) The absolute frequency of maternal input to bilingual and monolingual children. In Grüter, T and Paradis, J Input and experience in bilingual development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishings, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A (2017). Bilingual language input environments, intake, maturity and practice. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(1), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, ÖE, So, W-C, Özyürek, A and Goldin-Meadow, S (2012) Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(6), 844–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.589273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumontheil, I, Küster, O, Apperly, IA and Blakemore, S (2010) NeuroImage Taking perspective into account in a communicative task. NeuroImage 52(4), 1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, GJ and Magnuson, K (2012) Socioeconomic status and cognitive functioning: moving from correlation to causation, 3(June), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel de Abreu, PM (2011) Working memory in multilingual children: Is there a bilingual effect?. Memory 19(5), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.590504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, SP, Liberman, Z, Keysar, B and Kinzler, KD (2015) The exposure advantage: Early exposure to a multilingual environment promotes effective communication. Psychological Science 26(7), 1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615574699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukumura, K, van Gompel, RP and Pickering, MJ (2010) The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63(9), 1700–1715. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903490969CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garon, N, Bryson, SE and Smith, IM (2008) Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin 134(1), 31. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, SE, Pickering, SJ, Ambridge, B and Wearing, H (2004) The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology 40(2), 177. 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, V, Kennedy, I and Thomas, EM (2015) Socioeconomic level and bilinguals’ performance on language and cognitive measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(5), 1057–1078 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, PC, Hendrick, R, Ledoux, K and Yang, CL (1999) Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes 14(4), 353–379. httpTs://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, E, Theakston, A, Lieven, E and Tomasello, M (2015) Subject and object omission in children's early transitive constructions: A discourse-pragmatic approach. Applied Psycholinguistics 36(3), 701–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DW and Abutalebi, J (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(5), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerriero, AMS, Oshima-Takane, Y and Kuriyama, Y (2006) The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: a discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language 33(4), 823–857. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090600763XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, DA and Farah, MJ (2009) Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Science 13(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, DA, Gallop, R, Evans, GW and Farah, MJ (2015) Socioeconomic status and executive function: Developmental trajectories and mediation. Developmental Science 18(5), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, RM and Warren, JR (1997) Socioeconomic Indexes for Occupations: A Review, Update, and Critique. Sociological Methodology 27(1), 177–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9531.271028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, P (2016) Cognitive modeling of individual variation in reference production and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendriks, P, Englert, C, Wubs, E and Hoeks, J (2008) Age differences in adults’ use of referring expressions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-008-9065-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E (1998) The relation of birth order and socioeconomic status to children's language experience and language development. Applied Psycholinguistics 19(4), 603–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E, Welsh, S, Place, S and Ribot, K (2014) Properties of dual language input that shape bilingual development and properties of environments that shape dual language input. In Grüter, T and Paradis, J Input and experience in bilingual development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 119–140.Google Scholar
Horton, WS and Brennan, SE (2016) The role of metarepresentation in the production and resolution of referring expressions. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurtado, N, Grüter, T, Marchman, Va and Fernald, A (2014) Relative language exposure, processing efficiency and vocabulary in Spanish–English bilingual toddlers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(1), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300014XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvikivi, J, van Gompel, RPG, Hyönä, J and Bertram, R (2005) Ambiguous pronoun resolution: Contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts. Psychological Science 16(4), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01525.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, E (2012) Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 33(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Z, Woodward, AL, Keysar, B and Kinzler, KD (2017) Exposure to multiple languages enhances communication skills in infancy. Developmental Science 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, S, Keysar, B and Epley, N (2010) Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(3), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B (2000) The CHILDES project: The database (Vol. 2). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M, Fox, DEC, Becker, JA and Chalkley, MA (1985) Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition 19(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90017-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinis, T, Chiat, S, Armon-Lotem, S, Gibbons, D and Gipps, E (2010) School-Age Sentence Imitation Test (SASIT). Reading: University of Reading.Google Scholar
Martin-Rhee, MM and Bialystok, E (2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D, Lieven, E, Theakston, A and Tomasello, M (2006) The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 27(3), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLoyd, VC (1998) Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist. US: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, J, Calvo, A and Bialystok, E (2013) Journal of Experimental Child WM development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, ES and Bacso, SA (2017) Cognitive and behavioural predictors of adolescents' communicative perspective-taking and social relationships. Journal of Adolescence 56, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.01.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, ES and Graham, SA (2009) The relations between children's communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning. Cognitive Psychology 58(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, ES, Mangal, L and Macdonald, K (2013) Challenges in the role of a listener. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 56(April), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, ES, Varghese, A, Xu, Z and Fecica, A (2015) Children with stronger executive functioning and fewer ADHD traits produce more effective referential statements. Cognitive Development 36, 68–82. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J (2017) Parent report data on input and experience reliably predict bilingual development and this is not trivial. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(1), 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891600033XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozendaal, M and Baker, A (2010) The acquisition of reference: Pragmatic aspects and the influence of language input. Journal of Pragmatics 42(7), 1866–1879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryskin, RA, Benjamin, AS, Tullis, J and Brown-Schmidt, S (2015) Perspective-taking in comprehension, production, and memory: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144(5), 898–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryskin, RA, Brown-Schmidt, S, Canseco-Gonzalez, E, Yiu, LK and Nguyen, ET (2014) Visuospatial perspective-taking in conversation and the role of bilingual experience. Journal of Memory and Language 74, 46–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A, Marcos, H, Morgenstern, A, Hassan, R, Leber-Marin, J and Parès, J (2010a) Dialogical factors in toddlers’ use of clitic pronouns. First Language 30(3–4), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710379957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A, Marcos, H, Morgenstern, A, Hassan, R, Leber-Marin, J and Parès, J (2010b) Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: the use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics 42(7), 1842–1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L (2005) The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics 26(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L (2008) The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English preschoolers, school-age children, and adults. Language Learning and Development 4(4), 309–332. 10.1080/15475440802333619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L (2013) The role of number of referents and animacy in children's use of pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L and Allen, SE (Eds.). (2015) The Acquisition of Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L & Hervé, C (2015) Referential expressions in bilingual acquisition, In Serratrice, L and Allen, SE (Eds.). (2015). The Acquisition of Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, HN, Roeper, T and De Villiers, JG (2003) DELV: Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation: Screening Test. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Skarabela, B (2007) Signs of early social cognition in children's syntax: The case of joint attention in argument realization in child Inuktitut. Lingua 117(11), 1837–1857. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, CE (1999) Social perspectives on the emergence of language. In MacWhinney, B (ed.) The Emergence of Language. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 257–276.Google Scholar
Stephens, N (2015) Dative constructions and givenness in the speech of four-year-olds. Linguistics 53(3), 405–442. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner-Rhodes, SE, Mishler, A, Corbett, R, Andreu, L, Sanz-Torrent, M, Trueswell, JC & Novick, JM (2016) The effects of bilingualism on conflict monitoring, cognitive control, and garden-path recovery. Cognition 150, 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theakston, AL (2012) ” The spotty cow tickled the pig with a curly tail ”: How do sentence position , preferred argument structure , and referential complexity affect children ’ s and adults ’ choice of referring expression?. Applied Psycholinguistics 33(4), 691–724. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torregrossa, J (2017) The role of executive functions in the acquisition of reference: The production of demonstrative pronouns by German monolingual children. In Choi, J, Demirdache, H, Lungu, O and Voeltzel, L (eds.) Language Acquisition at the Interfaces. Proceedings of the GALA 2015 (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition). Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 316–330.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S (2013) Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(1), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valian, V (2015) Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rij, J (2012) Pronoun Processing:Computational, Behavioral, and Psychophysiological Studies in Children and Adults. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen.Google Scholar
Wardlow, L (2013) Individual differences in speakers ’ perspective taking: The roles of executive control and WM. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 766–772. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0396-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardlow, L and Heyman, GD (2016) The roles of feedback and WM in children's reference production. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 150, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G (1986) Variation in child language. In Fletcher, P and Garman, M (eds.) Language acquisition: Studies in first language development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar