Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:29:41.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: The use of artificial languages in bilingualism research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2019

Daniel J. Weiss
Daniel J. Weiss*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Program in Linguistics, The Pennsylvania State University
*
Address for correspondence: Daniel J. Weiss, E-mail: djw21@psu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For close to a century, experiments using artificial languages (hereafter ALs) have been a staple of psycholinguistic research (Esper, 1925). Contemporary AL research has spanned numerous levels of linguistic inquiry, from phonetic learning through syntax (see Culbertson & Schuler, 2019). This approach has also been successfully applied across development, from infants and children (see Saffran & Kirkham, 2018) through older adults (e.g., Schwab, Schuler, Stillman, Newport, Howard & Howard, 2016), even spanning cross-species comparisons (e.g., Wilson, Slater, Kikuchi, Milne, Marslen-Wilson, Smith & Petkov, 2013). Given the proliferation of AL methods for investigating issues related to first language acquisition, it is not surprising that research on bilingualism has also embraced this approach. This special themed section comprises four concise review articles describing how AL research has informed questions related to bilingualism and second language learning. The articles also discuss the strengths and limitations of this approach, as well as pointing to future directions for the field.

Keywords

artificial languagesbilingualism
Type
Review Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 72 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Culbertson, J and Schuler, K (2019) Artificial language learning in children. Annual Review of Linguistics 5, 353–373.Google Scholar
De Graaff, R (1997) The Esperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 249–276.Google Scholar
Esper, EA (1925) A technique for the experimental investigation of associative interference in artificial linguistic material. Language Monographs No. 1Google Scholar
Ettlinger, M, Morgan-Short, K, Faretta-Stutenberg, M and Wong, PC (2016) The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science 40, 822–847.Google Scholar
Grey, S (2020) What can artificial languages reveal about morphosyntactic processing in bilinguals? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, S, Ning, S and Marian, V (2020) From Klingon to Colbertian: Using artificial languages to study word learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K (2020) Insights into the neural mechanisms of becoming bilingual: A brief synthesis of second language research with artificial linguistic systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K, Steinhauer, K, Sanz, C and Ullman, MT (2012) Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24, 933–947. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00119Google Scholar
Saffran, JR and Kirkham, NZ (2018) Infant statistical learning. Annual Review of Psychology 69, 181–203.Google Scholar
Schwab, JF, Schuler, KD, Stillman, CM, Newport, EL, Howard, JH Jr. and Howard, DV (2016) Aging and the statistical learning of grammatical form classes. Psychology and Aging 31, 481–487.Google Scholar
Weiss, DJ, Poepsel, T and Gerfen, C (2015) Tracking multiple inputs: The challenge of bilingual statistical learning. In Rebuschat, P (ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages.John Benjamins Press, pp. 167–190.Google Scholar
Weiss, DJ, Schwob, N and Lebkuecher, A (2020) Bilingualism and statistical learning: Lessons from studies using artificial languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23.Google Scholar
Wilson, B, Slater, H, Kikuchi, Y, Milne, AE, Marslen-Wilson, WD, Smith, K and Petkov, CI (2013) Auditory artificial grammar learning in macaque and marmoset monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 33, 18825–18835.Google Scholar