Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English*

  • RENITA SILVA (a1) and HARALD CLAHSEN (a1)

Abstract

This paper reports results from masked priming experiments investigating regular past-tense forms and deadjectival nominalizations with -ness and -ity in adult native (L1) speakers of English and in different groups of advanced adult second language (L2) learners of English. While the L1 group showed efficient priming for both inflected and derived word forms, the L2 learners demonstrated repetition-priming effects (like the L1 group), but no priming for inflected and reduced priming for derived word forms. We argue that this striking contrast between L1 and L2 processing supports the view that adult L2 learners rely more on lexical storage and less on combinatorial processing of morphologically complex words than native speakers.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Harald Clahsen, Department of Linguistics, University of Essex, Colchester, C04 3SQ, UKharald@essex.ac.uk

Footnotes

Hide All
*

We are grateful to Jim Blevins, Ian Cunnings, Sonja Eisenbeiss, Claudia Felser, Roger Hawkins, Hui-Yu Pan, Mika Sato, Michael Ullman, João Verissimo, and two anonymous BLC reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Allan, D. 1992. Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allen, M. & Badecker, W. 2002. Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 705722.
Anderson, S. R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press.
Aronoff, M. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & van Rijn, H. 1993. The CELEX lexical database (CD ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
Baumann, N., Nagengast, J. & Klaas, G. 1993. New Experimental Setup (NESU). Ms., MPI for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
Boudelaa, S. & Marslen-Wilson, W. 2005. Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 207260.
Brovetto, C. & Ullman, M. 2001. First vs. second language: A differential reliance on grammatical computations and lexical memory. Poster presented at the 14th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Pennsylvania.
Clahsen, H. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 9911060.
Clahsen, H. 2006. Linguistic perspectives on morphological processing. In Wunderlich, (ed.), pp. 355–388.
Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. 2006a. How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564570.
Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. 2006b. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 342.
Clahsen, H., Sonnenstuhl, I. & Blevins, J. P. 2003. Derivational morphology in the German mental lexicon: A dual-mechanism account. In Baayen, H. & Schreuder, R. (eds.), Morphological structure in language processing, pp. 125155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Davis, C. & Lupker, S. 2006. Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668687.
Felser, C. & Roberts, L. 2007. Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23, 936.
Forster, K. I. 1999. The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language, 68, 515.
Forster, K. I. & Davis, C. 1984. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680698.
Forster, K. I., Mohan, K. & Hector, J. 2003. The mechanics of masked priming. In Kinoshita, S. & Lupker, S. J. (eds.), Masked priming: State of the art, pp. 337. Hove: Psychology Press.
Friederici, A. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 7884.
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A. & Forster, K. 2005. Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 12931326.
Hahne, A., Müller, J. & Clahsen, H. 2006. Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 121134.
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C. 1997. The partial availability of UG in second language acquisition: The “failed functional features hypothesis”. Second Language Research, 13, 187226.
Hernandez, A., Ping, L. & MacWhinney, B. 2005. The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 220225.
Indefrey, P. 2006. A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which suggested differences can we trust and what do they mean? Language Learning, 56, 279304.
Jackendoff, R. & Pinker, S. 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language. Cognition, 97, 211225.
Lardiere, D. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Archibald, J. (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, pp. 102129. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lavric, A., Clapp, C. & Rastle, K. 2007. ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866877.
Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C. & Clahsen, H. 2005. Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 5378.
Marslen-Wilson, W. & Tyler, L. K. 1998. Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 428435.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R. & Older, L. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 333.
Matthews, P. H. 1991. Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McClelland, J. L. & Patterson, K. 2002. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 465472.
McDonald, J. 2006. Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381401.
Meisel, J. M. 1991. Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language use. In Eubank, L. (ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal grammar in the second language, pp. 231276. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Müller, J. 2005. Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing. Second Language Research, 21, 152174.
Münte, T., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K. & Kutas, M. 1999. Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 241253.
Parodi, T., Schwartz, B. D. & Clahsen, H. 2004. On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals. Linguistics, 42, 669705.
Penke, M. 2006. The representation of inflectional morphology in the mental lexicon. An overview of psycho- and neurolinguistic methods and results. In Wunderlich, (ed.), pp. 389–428.
Perani, D. & Abutalebi, J. 2005. The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 202206.
Pinker, S. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
Pinker, S. & Ullman, M. T. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456463.
Plaut, D. & Gonnerman, L. M. 2000. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to language processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445485.
Prévost, P. & White, L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103133.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. & Tyler, L. K. 2000. Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507537.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. & New, B. 2004. The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 10901098.
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Münte, T. & Clahsen, H. 2002. Morphological priming in Spanish verb forms: An ERP repetition priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 443454.
Sabourin, L. & Haverkort, M. 2003. Neural substrates of representation and processing of a second language. In Van Hout, R., Hulk, A., Kuiken, F. & Towell, R. (eds.), The lexicon–syntax interface in second language acquisition, pp. 175195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sakaguchi, K. 2006. Morphological processing of inflection in native speakers and second language learners of English: A masked priming study. MA dissertation, University of Essex.
Seidenberg, M. S. & Gonnerman, L. M 2000. Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353361.
Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S. & Clahsen, H. 1999. Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203236.
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P. & Hall, R. 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399412.
Stump, G. T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ullman, M. T. 2001. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105122.
Ullman, M. T. 2004. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231270.
Ullman, M. T. 2005. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice, pp. 141178. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Weber, A. & Cutler, A. 2003. Lexical competition in non-native spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 125.
Wunderlich, D. (ed.) 2006. Advances in the theory of the lexicon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed