Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing

  • IAN CUNNINGS (a1)
Abstract

A growing body of research has investigated bilingual sentence processing. How to account for differences in native (L1) and non-native (L2) processing is controversial. Some explain L1/L2 differences in terms of different parsing mechanisms, and the hypothesis that L2 learners adopt ‘shallow’ parsing has received considerable attention. Others assume L1/L2 processing is similar, and explain L1/L2 differences in terms of capacity-based limitations being exceeded during L2 processing. More generally, the role that working memory plays in language acquisition and processing has garnered increasing interest. Based on research investigating L2 sentence processing, I claim that a primary source of L1/L2 differences lies in the ability to retrieve information constructed during sentence processing from memory. In contrast to describing L1/L2 differences in terms of shallow parsing or capacity limitations, I argue that L2 speakers are more susceptible to retrieval interference when successful comprehension requires access to information from memory.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Dr Ian Cunnings, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK, RG6 7BEi.cunnings@reading.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Aldwayan , R. Fiorentino , & A. Gabriele (2010). Evidence of syntactic constraints in the processing of wh-movement: A study of Najdi Arabic learners of English. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (eds.). Research in Second Language Processing and Parsing, pp. 6586. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

J. Alemán-Bañón , R. Fiorentino , & A. Gabriele (2014). Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1-L2 similarity and structural distance. Second Language Research, 30, 275306.

A. Baddeley (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417423.

A. Baddeley (2007). Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Oxford: OUP.

A. Baddeley , & G. Hitch (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation; Advances in Research and Theory, New York: Academic Press.

A. Belletti , E. Bennati , & A. Sorace (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 657689.

H. Bowden , K. Steinhauer , C. Sanz , & M. Ullman (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51, 24922511.

K. Christianson , A. Hollingworth , J. Halliwell , & F. Ferreira (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368407.

K. Clackson , C. Felser , & H. Clahsen (2011). Children's processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 128144.

H. Clahsen , & C. Felser (2006a). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564570.

W-Y. Chow , S. Lewis , & C. Phillips (2014). Immediate sensitivity to structural constraints in pronoun resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 630. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00630

C. Clifton , S. Kennison , & J. Albrecht (1997). Reading the words her, his, and him: Implications for parsing principles based on frequency and structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 276292.

F. Cuetos , & D. Mitchell (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73105.

I. Cunnings , & C. Felser (2013). The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 188219.

I. Cunnings , C. Batterham , C. Felser , & H. Clahsen (2010). ‘Constraints on L2 learners’ processing of wh- dependencies: Evidence from eye-movements’ in B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Second Language Processing and Parsing I, pp 87110. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.

I. Cunnings , & P. Sturt (2014). Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 117139.

A. Dallas , G. DeDe , & J. Nicol (2013). An event-related potential (ERP) investigation of filler-gap processing in native and second language speakers. Language Learning, 63, 766799.

A. Dallas , & E. Kaan (2008). Second language processing of filler-gap dependencies in late learners. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 372388.

M. Daneman , & P. Carpenter (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450466.

B. Dillon , A. Mishler , S. Sloggett , & C. Phillips (2013). Contrasting intrusions profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modelling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 85103.

P. Dussias (2003). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in second language learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 529557.

P. Dussias , & T. Cramer Scaltz (2008). Spanish–English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta Psychologica, 128, 501513.

M. Ellert (2013). Resolving ambiguous pronouns in a second language: A visual-world eye-tracking study with Dutch learners of German. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 51, 171197.

C. Felser , L. Roberts , T. Marinis & R. Gross (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 453489.

C. Felser , & L. Roberts (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23, 936.

F. Ferreira , K. Bailey , & V. Ferraro (2002). Good enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 1115.

F. Ferreira , & N. Patson (2007). The good enough approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 7183.

A. Foucart , & C. Frenck-Mestre (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226248.

L. Frazier , & C. Clifton (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 93126.

C. Frenck-Mestre , & J. Pynte (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 119148.

E. Gibson (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 176.

E. Gibson , N. Pearlmutter , E. Canseco-Gonzalez , & G. Hickok (1996). Recency preferences in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59, 2359.

E. Gibson , & T. Warren (2004). Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7, 5578.

E. Gilboy , J. Sopena , C. Clifton , & L. Frazier (1995). Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English compound NPs. Cognition, 54, 131167.

P. Gordon , R. Hendrick , & M. Johnson (2001). Memory interference during sentence processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425430.

R. Hartsuiker (2015). Why it is pointless to ask under which specific circumstances the bilingual advantage occurs. Cortex, 73, 336337.

P. Hofmeister , & I. Sag (2010). Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language, 86, 366415.

H. Hopp (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22, 369397.

H. Hopp (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflectional morphology: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901931.

H. Hopp (2014). Working memory effects in the L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 21, 250278.

C. Jackson (2008). Proficiency level and the interaction of lexical and morphosyntatic information during L2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 58, 875909.

G. Jacob , & C. Felser (2016). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 907925.

L. Jäger , L. Benz , J. Roeser , B. Dillon , & S. Vasishth (2015). Teasing apart retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 506. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00506

N. Jiang (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603634.

N. Jiang (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57, 133.

A. Juffs (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199225.

A. Juffs (1998). Main verb vs reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107147.

A. Juffs , & M. Harrington (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language processing research. Language Learning, 46, 283323.

M. Just , & P. Carpenter (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. The Psychological Review, 99, 122149.

M. Just , T. Carpenter , & A. Keller (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. The Psychological Review, 103, 773780.

E. Kaan (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L2. What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 257–82.

I. Kan , Drummey A. Teubner-Rhodes , L. Nutile , L. Krupa , & J. Novick (2013). To adapt or not to adapt: The question of domain-general cognitive control. Cognition, 129, 637651.

N. Kazanina , E. Lau , M. Lieberman , M. Yoshida , & C. Phillips (2007). The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backward anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 384409.

G. Keating (2009). Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59, 503535.

G. Keating (2010). The effects of linear distance and working memory on the processing of gender agreement in Spanish. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing, pp. 113134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

S. Kennison (2003). Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of referential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 335352.

E. Kim , S. Baek , & A. Tremblay (2015). The role of island constraints in second language sentence processing. Language Acquisition, 22, 384416.

R. Kluender , & M. Kutas (1993). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 573633.

R. Lewis , & S. Vasishth (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29, 375419.

R. Lewis , S. Vasishth , & J. Van Dyke (2006). Computation principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 447454.

S. Lewis , & C. Phillips (2015). Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 2746.

J. Linck , P. Osthus , J. Koeth , & M. Bunting (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic bulletin and Review, 21, 861883.

T. Marinis , L Roberts , C. Felser , & H. Clahsen (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 5378.

A. Martin , & B. McElree (2008). A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 879906.

A. Martin , & B. McElree (2011). Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 327343.

B. McElree (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 111123.

B. McElree (2006). Accessing recent events. In B. Ross (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 46. San Diego: Academic Press.

B. McElree , S. Foraker , & L. Dyer (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 6791.

J. McDonald (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgement performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381401.

A. Miller (2014). Accessing and maintaining referent in L2 processing of wh-dependencies. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 167191.

J. Nicol , & D. Swinney (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 18, 520.

J. Novick , E. Hussey , S. Teubner-Rhodes , I. Harbison , & M. Bunting (2014). Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 186217.

H. Pan , & C. Felser (2011). Referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution: Evidence from self-paced reading. Lingua, 121, 221236.

H. Pan , S. Schimke , & C. Felser (2015). Referential context effects in non-native relative clause ambiguity resolution. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 298313.

D. Papadopoulou , & H. Clahsen (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 501528.

D. Papadopoulou , E. Peristeri , E. Plemenou , T. Marinis , & I. Tsimpli (2015). Pronoun ambiguity resolution in Greek: Evidence from monolinguals adults and children. Lingua, 155, 98120.

C. Patterson , H. Trompelt , & C. Felser (2014). The online application of binding condition B in native and non-native pronoun resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00147

N. Pearlmutter , S. Garnsey , & K. Bock (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427456.

C. Phillips (2013). Some arguments and non-arguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 156187.

L. Roberts , M. Gullberg , & P. Indefrey (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333357.

N. Sagarra , & J. Herschensohn (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 120, 20222039.

N. Sagarra , & J. Herschensohn (2013). Processing of gender and number agreement in late Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17, 607627.

E. Shen , A. Staub , & L. Sanders (2013). Event-related brain potential evidence that local nouns affect subject-verb agreement processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 498524.

T. Slattery , P. Sturt , K. Christianson , M. Yoshida , & F. Ferreira (2013). Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 104120.

A. Sorace (2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 133.

A. Sorace & F. Filiaci (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339368.

L. Stowe (1986). Parsing wh- constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227245.

B. Swets , T. Desmet , C. Clifton , & F. Ferreira (2008). Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory and Cognition, 36, 201216.

B. Swets , T. Desmet , D. Hambrick , & F. Ferreira (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 6481.

P. Sturt (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 542562.

D. Tanner , J. Nicol , & L. Brehm (2014). The time course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 195215.

M. Traxler , & M. Pickering (1996). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 542562.

M. Traxler , M. Pickering , & C. Clifton (1998). Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 558592.

I. Tsimpli , A. Sorace , C. Heycock , & F. Filiaci (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 257277.

M. Ullman (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105122.

J. Van Dyke , & C. Johns (2012). Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 193211.

J. Van Dyke , C. Johns , & A. Kukona (2014). Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension. Cognition, 131, 373403.

J. Van Dyke , & B. McElree (2011). Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 247263.

L. Vuong , & R. Martin (2014). Domain-specific executive control and the revision of misinterpretations in sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 312325.

M. Wagers , E. Lau , & C. Phillips (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206237.

J. Williams , P. Möbius , & C. Kim (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 509540.

M. Xiang , B. Dillon , & C. Phillips (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain & Language, 108, 4055.

M. Yoshida , N. Kazanina , L. Pablos , & P. Sturt (2014) On the origin of islands. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 761770.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1366-7289
  • EISSN: 1469-1841
  • URL: /core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 228 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 524 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.