Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Perception of tones by bilingual infants learning non-tone languages

  • LIQUAN LIU (a1) (a2) and RENÉ KAGER (a1)
Abstract

This paper examines the ability of bilingual infants who were learning Dutch and another non-tone language to discriminate tonal contrasts. All infants from 5 to 18 months of age succeeded in discriminating a tonal contrast of Mandarin Chinese (Tone 1 versus Tone 4) and showed a U-shaped pattern when facing a less acoustically salient manipulated version (contracted) of the aforementioned contrast. Specifically, infants showed initial sensitivity to the contracted contrast during their early months, followed by a loss of sensitivity at the stage where tonal perceptual reorganization typically occurs, and a sensitivity rebound by the end of the first year after birth. Compared to a previous studying of ours testing monolingual Dutch infants (Liu & Kager, 2014), the discrimination patterns of bilingual infants revealed both similarities and differences. On one hand, as with monolinguals, non-tone-learning bilingual infants’ tonal perception presented plasticity influenced by contrast acoustic salience along the trajectory of perceptual reorganization; as well as a general U-shaped perceptual pattern when discriminating non-native tones. On the other hand, bilingual infants appeared to regain sensitivity to the contracted tonal contrast at an earlier age (11–12 months) in comparison with monolinguals infants (17–18 months). We provide several explanations, stemming from the simultaneous exposure to two languages, to account for the 6-month bilingual perceptual plasticity from linguistic and cognitive perspectives. The overall outcomes of the study offer insights into the infant perceptual reorganization and language development trajectory, expand on the differences between monolingual and bilingual language development, and broaden our understanding of the influence of bilingual exposure to the perception of non-native contrasts in infancy from linguistic and cognitive perspectives.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Liquan Liu, Western Sydney University, School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Locked Bag 1797, NSW2751, Sydney, Australia liquanliu@hotmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All
We dearly thank Andrés Vanegas, Ileana Grama, Leher Singh, Maxime Pagnoulle, Rafèu Sichel-Bazin, Wei Wang, the babylab group, the experimental phonology group and the multilingualism group members of Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University for their kind feedback. A special thank goes to Brendan Devers for his tremendous support on this paper. We sincerely thank Bilingualism: Language and Cognition anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on this paper. We owe our thanks to all the enthusiastic and supportive families that participated in our research. Part of the data was presented in Liu & Kager, 2013.
Footnotes
References
Hide All
Albareda-CastellotB., PonsF., & Sebastián-GallésN. (2011). The acquisition of phonetic categories in bilingual infants: new data from an anticipatory eye movement paradigm. Developmental Science, 14, 395401.
BaumS., & TitoneD. (2014). Moving towards a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 857894.
BestC. T., McRobertsG. W., LaFleurR., & Silver-IsenstadtJ. (1995). Divergent developmental patterns for infants’ perception of two nonnative consonant contrasts. Infant Behavior and Development, 18 (3), 339350.
BestC. T., McRobertsG. W., & SitholeN. N. (1988). Examination of the perceptual reorganization for speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345360.
BialystokE. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636644. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00046
BialystokE. (2001). Metalinguistic aspects of bilingual processing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 169181. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190501000101
BialystokE. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, pp 311. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728908003477
BoersmaP., & WeeninkD. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05) [Computer program]. Retrieved May 1, 2009, from http://www.praat.org/
BoschL., & Sebastián-GallésN. (1997). Native-language recognition abilities in 4-month-old infants from monolingual and bilingual environments. Cognition, 65 (1), 3369.
BoschL., & Sebastián-GallésN. (2001). Evidence of early language discrimination abilities in infants from bilingual environments. Infancy, 2 (1), 2949.
BoschL., & Sebastián-GallésN. (2003). Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech, 46 (2-3), 217243.
BritoN., & BarrR. (2012). Influence of bilingualism on memory generalization during infancy. Developmental Science, 15 (6), 812816.
BritoN., & BarrR. (2014). Flexible memory retrieval in bilingual 6-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 56 (5), 11561163.
BurnhamD., KasisopaB., ReidA., LuksaneeyanawinS., LacerdaF., AttinaV., Xu RattanasoneN., SchwarzI-C., & WebsterD. (2014). Universality and language-specific experience in the perception of lexical tone and pitch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 77, 571591.
BurnsT. C., YoshidaC. A., HillK., & WerkerJ.F. (2007). The development of phonetic representation in bilingual and monolingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 455474.
Byers-HeinleinK., BurnsT. C., & WerkerJ. F. (2010). The roots of bilingualism in newborns. Psychological Science, 21 (3), 343348.
CarlsonS. M., & MeltzoffA. N. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11, 282298. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00675.x
ChenA., & FikkertP. (2007). Intonation of early two-word utterances in Dutch. In Trouvain J. and Barry W.J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Dudweiler: Pirrot. 315320.
CurtinS., Byers-HeinleinK., & WerkerJ. F. (2011). Bilingual beginnings as a lens for theory development: PRIMIR in focus. Journal of Phonetics, 39 (4), 492504.
DeCasperA. J., & SpenceM. J. (1986). Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9 (2), 133150.
FikkertP., & ChenA. (2011). The role of word-stress and intonation in word recognition in Dutch 14- and 24-month-olds. In Danis N., Mesh K., & Sung H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, (222-232), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
FrotaS., ButlerJ., & VigárioM. (2014). Infants' Perception of Intonation: Is It a Statement or a Question?. Infancy, 19 (2), 194213.
GandourJ., WongD., HsiehL., WeinzapfelB., LanckerD. V., & HutchinsG. D. (2000). A crosslinguistic PET study of tone perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (1), 207222.
Garcia-SierraA., Rivera-GaxiolaM., PercaccioC. R., ConboyB. T., RomoH., KlarmanL., OrtizS., & KuhlP. K. (2011). Bilingual language learning: An ERP study relating early brain responses to speech, language input, and later word production. Journal of Phonetics, 39 (4), 546557.
GeneseeF. (2001). Bilingual first language acquisition: Exploring the limits of the language faculty. In McGroarty M. (Ed.) 21st Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 153168.
GervainJ., & WerkerJ. F. (2013). Prosody cues word order in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Nature Communications, 4, 1490. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2430
Graf EstesK., & HayJ. F. (2015). Flexibility in Bilingual Infants' Word Learning. Child development.
GuttentagR. E., HaithM. M., GoodmanG. S., & HauchJ. (1984). Semantic processing of unattended words by bilinguals: A test of the input switch mechanism. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 178188. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90126-9
HalléP. A., ChangY-C., & BestC. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32 (3), 395421.
HarrisonP. (2000). Acquiring the phonology of lexical tone in infancy. Lingua, 110, 581616.
HavyM., BouchonC., & NazziT. (2015). Phonetic processing when learning words The case of bilingual infants. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 0165025415570646.
HayJ. F., Graf EstesK., WangT., & SaffranJ. R. (2014). From flexibility to constraint: The contrastive use of lexical tone in early word learning. Child development.
JunS.-A., & FougeronC. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In Botinis A. (ed.) Intonation: Analysis, Modeling and Technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 209242.
KaanE., BarkleyC., BaoM., & WaylandR. (2008). Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study. BMC Neuroscience, 9 (1), 53.
KovácsÁ. M., & MehlerJ. (2009a). Flexible learning of multiple speech structures in bilingual infants. Science, 325 (5940), 611612.
KovácsÁ. M., & MehlerJ. (2009b). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (16), 65566560.
KrishnanA., GandourJ. T., & BidelmanG. M. (2010). The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brain stem. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23, 8195.
KuhlP. K., ConboyB. T., Coffey-CorinaS., PaddenD., Rivera-GaxiolaM., & NelsonT. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363 (1493), 9791000.
KuipersJ. R., & ThierryG. (2012). Event-related potential correlates of language change detection in bilingual toddlers. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 (1), 97102.
KuipersJ. R., & ThierryG. (2013). ERP-pupil size correlations reveal how bilingualism enhances cognitive flexibility. Cortex, 49 (10), 28532860.
LiuL. (2013). The Effect of Bilingualism on Infant Language Development: The Acquisition of Sounds and Words. Published Doctoral dissertation. Nederlands Graduate School of Linguistics, ISBN 78–94-6093-129-1.
LiuL., & KagerR. W. J. (2013). How bilingualism alters infants' tone perception during perceptual reorganization. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 231–240, Cascadilla Press.
LiuL., & KagerR. W. J. (2014). Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language. Cognition, 133 (2), 385394.
LiuL., & KagerR. W. J. (2015a). Bilingualism changes infant VOT perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 38, 2736.
LiuL., & KagerR. W. J. (2015b). Perception of a native vowel contrast by Dutch monolingual and bilingual infants —- a perceptual lead. International Journal of Bilingualism, doi: 10.1177/1367006914566082
LiuL., & KagerR. W. J. (2015c). Understanding phonological acquisition through phonetic perception –the influence of exposure and acoustic salience. Phonological Studies, 18, 5158.
MännelC., & FriedericiA. D. (2009). Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 (10), 19882006.
MattockK., & BurnhamD. (2006). Chinese and English Infants’ Tone Perception: Evidence for Perceptual Reorganization. Infancy, 10 (3), 24265.
MattockK., MolnarM., PolkaL., & BurnhamD. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106, 13671381.
MehlerJ., JusczykP. W., LambertzG., HalstedN., BertonciniJ., & Amiel-TisonC. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 144178.
MeiselJ. M. (2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In Cenoz J. and Genesee F. (Eds.), Trends in Bilingual Acquisition, 1141. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
MolnarM., GervainJ., & CarreirasM. (2014). Within rhythm class native language discrimination abilities of Basque-Spanish monolingual and bilingual infants at 3.5 months of age. Infancy, 19 (3), 326337.
NarayanC. R., WerkerJ. F., & BeddorP. S. (2010). The interaction between acoustic salience and language experience in developmental speech perception: evidence from nasal place discrimination. Developmental Science, 13, 407420.
NazziT., BertonciniJ., & MehlerJ. (1998a). Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (3), 756766.
NazziT., FlocciaC., & BertonciniJ. (1998). Discrimination of pitch contours by neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 779784.
NazziT., NelsonD. G., JusczykP. W., & JusczykA. M. (2000). Six-month-olds' detection of clauses embedded in continuous speech: Effects of prosodic well-formedness. Infancy, 1 (1), 123147.
NicoladisE., & GeneseeF. (1997). Language development in preschool bilingual children. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 21, 258270.
PannekampA., WeberC., & FriedericiA. D. (2006). Prosodic processing at the sentence level in infants. Neuroreport, 17 (6), 675678.
ParadisJ., & GeneseeF. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 125. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100014662
PearsonB. Z., FernándezS. C., & OllerD. K. (1993). Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning, 43 (1), 93120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00174.x
PearsonB. Z., FernándezS. C., LewedgeV., & OllerD. K. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 4158.
PetittoL. A., BerensM. S., KovelmanI., DubinsM. H., JasinskaK., & ShalinskyM. (2012). The “Perceptual Wedge Hypothesis” as the basis for bilingual babies’ phonetic processing advantage: New insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain and language, 121 (2), 130143.
PolkaL., & BohnO. S. (1996). A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100 (1), 577592.
QuamC., & SwingleyD. (2010). Phonological knowledge guides 2-year-olds’ and adults’ interpretation of salient pitch contours in word learning. Journal of memory and language, 62 (2), 135150.
SansaviniA., BertonciniJ., & GiovanelliG. (1997). Newborns discriminate the rhythm of multisyllabic stressed words. Developmental Psychology, 33 (1), 311.
Sebastián-GallésN. (2010). Bilingual Language Acquisition: Where Does the Difference Lie?. Human Development. 53, 245255.
Sebastián-GallésN., Albareda-CastellotB., WeikumW. M., & WerkerJ. F. (2012). A bilingual advantage in visual language discrimination in infancy. Psychological Science, 23 (9), 994999.
Sebastián-GallésN., & BoschL. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: Is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental Science, 12 (6), 874887.
Sebastián-GallésN., BoschL., & PonsF. (2008). Early bilingualism. Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development, 172182.
SeidlA., & CristiàA. (2008). Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues. Developmental Science, 11 (4), 596606.
SinghL., & FoongJ. (2012). Influences of Lexical Tone and Pitch on Word Recognition in Bilingual Infants. Cognition. 124 (2), 128142.
SinghL., FuC. S., RahmanA. A., HameedW. B., SanmugamS., AgarwalP., JiangB., ChongY., MeaneyM., & Rifkin-GraboiA. (2014a). Back to Basics: A Bilingual Advantage in Infant Visual Habituation. Child development, 86 (1), 294302.
SinghL., HuiT. J., ChanC., & GolinkoffR. M. (2014b). Influences of vowel and tone variation on emergent word knowledge: a cross-linguistic investigation. Developmental science, 17 (1), 94109.
SnowD., & BalogH. L. (2002). Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research. Lingua, 112 (12), 10251058.
SundaraM., PolkaL., & MolnarM. (2008). Development of coronal stop perception: Bilingual infants keep pace with their monolingual peers. Cognition, 108 (1), 232242.
SundaraM., & ScutellaroA. (2011). Rhythmic distance between languages affects the development of speech perception in bilingual infants. Journal of Phonetics, 39 (4), 505513.
ValianV. (2015). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (01), 324.
VanrellM. M., PrietoP., AstrucL., PayneE., & PostB. (2010). Early acquisition of F0 alignment and scaling patterns in Catalan and Spanish. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, 100839, 1–4.
VeenkerT. J. G. (2007). [program]. http://www.beexy.org/.
WangY., JongmanA., & SerenoJ. A. (2001). Dichotic perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese and American listeners. Brain and Language, 78 (3), 332348.
WerkerJ. (2012). Perceptual Foundations of Bilingual Acquisition in Infancy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience, 1251, 5061. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06484.
WerkerJ. F., Byers-HeinleinK., & FennellC. T. (2009). Bilingual beginnings to learning words. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364 (1536), 36493663.
WerkerJ. F., & TeesR. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 4963.
WerkerJ. F., & TeesR. C. (2005). Speech Perception as a Window for Understanding Plasticity and Commitment in Language Systems of the Brain. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 233251.
XuY., GandourJ., & FrancisA. (2006). Effects of language experience and stimulus complexity on categorical perception of pitch direction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120 (2), 10631074.
YeungH. H., ChenK. H., & WerkerJ. F. (2013). When does native language input reorganize phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 (2), 123139.
YipM. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1366-7289
  • EISSN: 1469-1841
  • URL: /core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 187 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 686 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.