Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 16
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    CUNNINGS, IAN 2016. Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, p. 1.


    Hopp, Holger 2016. Cross-linguistic lexical and syntactic co-activation in L2 sentence processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism,


    Caffarra, Sendy Molinaro, Nicola Davidson, Doug and Carreiras, Manuel 2015. Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 51, p. 31.


    Deng, Taiping Zhou, Huixia Bi, Hong-Yan and Chen, Baoguo 2015. Input-based structure-specific proficiency predicts the neural mechanism of adult L2 syntactic processing. Brain Research, Vol. 1610, p. 42.


    HOPP, HOLGER 2015. Individual differences in the second language processing of object–subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 36, Issue. 02, p. 129.


    Kroll, Judith F. Dussias, Paola E. Bice, Kinsey and Perrotti, Lauren 2015. Bilingualism, Mind, and Brain. Annual Review of Linguistics, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 377.


    Marinis, Theodoros 2015. Providing some more pieces to the puzzle: L2 adults, L2 children and children with specific language impairment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 499.


    Miller, A. Kate 2015. INTERMEDIATE TRACES AND INTERMEDIATE LEARNERS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 37, Issue. 03, p. 487.


    Pliatsikas, Christos and Chondrogianni, Vicky 2015. Editorial: Learning a non-native language in a naturalistic environment: insights from behavioral and neuroimaging research. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Rastelli, Stefano and Zuanazzi, Arianna 2015. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013.


    Sanoudaki, Eirini and Thierry, Guillaume 2015. Language non-selective syntactic activation in early bilinguals: the role of verbal fluency. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, Vol. 18, Issue. 5, p. 548.


    2015. Does morphology play a role in L2 processing?: Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticae Investigationes, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 338.


    Carrasco-Ortiz, Haydee and Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl 2014. Phonological and orthographic cues enhance the processing of inflectional morphology. ERP evidence from L1 and L2 French. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5,


    Dekydtspotter, Laurent and Renaud, Claire 2014. On second language processing and grammatical development: The parser in second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 131.


    Pliatsikas, Christos Johnstone, Tom and Marinis, Theodoros 2014. Grey Matter Volume in the Cerebellum is Related to the Processing of Grammatical Rules in a Second Language: A Structural Voxel-based Morphometry Study. The Cerebellum, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 55.


    Dallas, Andrea DeDe, Gayle and Nicol, Janet 2013. An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Investigation of Filler-Gap Processing in Native and Second Language Speakers. Language Learning, Vol. 63, Issue. 4, p. 766.


    ×

Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap*

  • CHRISTOS PLIATSIKAS (a1) and THEODOROS MARINIS (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S136672891200017X
  • Published online: 28 May 2012
Abstract

An ongoing debate on second language (L2) processing revolves around whether or not L2 learners process syntactic information similarly to monolinguals (L1), and what factors lead to a native-like processing. According to the Shallow Structure Hypothesis (Clahsen & Felser, 2006a), L2 learners’ processing does not include abstract syntactic features, such as intermediate gaps of wh-movement, but relies more on lexical/semantic information. Other researchers have suggested that naturalistic L2 exposure can lead to native-like processing (Dussias, 2003). This study investigates the effect of naturalistic exposure in processing wh-dependencies. Twenty-six advanced Greek learners of L2 English with an average nine years of naturalistic exposure, 30 with classroom exposure, and 30 native speakers of English completed a self-paced reading task with sentences involving intermediate gaps. L2 learners with naturalistic exposure showed evidence of native-like processing of the intermediate gaps, suggesting that linguistic immersion can lead to native-like abstract syntactic processing in the L2.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Christos Pliatsikas, Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging and Neurodynamics, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AL, UKc.pliatsikas@reading.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

This study was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (Project no.: PTA-030–2006-00359). We would like to thank Giuli Dussias and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive feedback. Additionally, we would like to thank Stavroula-Thaleia Kousta and Gabriella Vigliocco for providing us with space to test some participants at University College London, and also the “Scholars” language school (Kallithea, Greece), Athanassios Protopapas and Eleni Vlahou (University of Athens) for providing us with space to test participants in Greece.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

E. Bialystok (1997). The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13 (2), 116137.

H. Clahsen , & C. Felser (2006b). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (12), 564570.

C. Clifton , & L. Frazier (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing, pp. 273317. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

A. Dallas , & E. Kaan (2008). Second language processing of filler–gap dependencies by late learners. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3), 372388.

P. E. Dussias (2003). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 (4), 529557.

P. E. Dussias , & P. Piñar (2010). Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 26 (4), 443472.

C. Felser , & L. Roberts (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23 (1), 936.

C. Felser , L. Roberts , R. Gross , & T. Marinis (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24 (3), 453489.

A. Foucart , & C. Frenck-Mestre (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66 (1), 226248.

S. Garnsey , N. Pearlmutter , E. Myers , & M. Lotocky (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 5893.

E. Gibson , & T. Warren (2004). Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7 (1), 5578.

M. Gillon-Dowens , M. Vergara , H. A. Barber , & M. Carreiras (2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (8), 18701887.

A. Hahne (2001). What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30 (3), 251266.

E. Havik , L. Roberts , R. van Hout , R. Schreuder , & M. Haverkort (2009). Processing subject–object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 59 (1), 73112.

H. Hopp (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22 (3), 369397.

C. N. Jackson (2008). Proficiency level and the interaction of lexical and morphosyntactic information during L2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 58 (4), 875909.

N. Jiang (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57 (1), 133.

A. Juffs (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21 (2), 121151.

A. Juffs , & M. Harrington (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 46 (2), 283323.

M. A. Just , P. A. Carpenter , & J. D. Woolley (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111 (2), 228238.

T. Love , & D. Swinney (1996). Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 524.

P. D. MacIntyre , K. A. Noels , & R. Clément (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47 (2), 265287.

T. Marinis , L. Roberts , C. Felser , & H. Clahsen (2005). Gaps in second language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 (1), 5378.

C. Muñoz (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29 (4), 578596.

D. Papadopoulou (2005). Reading-time studies of second language ambiguity resolution. Second Language Research, 21 (2), 98120.

D. Papadopoulou , & H. Clahsen (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 (4), 501528.

M. T. Ullman (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105122.

M. T. Ullman (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92 (1–2), 231270.

J. N. Williams , P. Mobius , & C. Kim (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22 (4), 509540.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1366-7289
  • EISSN: 1469-1841
  • URL: /core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: