Yuan, Boping 2017. Can L2 sentence processing strategies be native-like? Evidence from English speakers’ L2 processing of Chinese base-generated-topic sentences. Lingua, Vol. 191-192, p. 42.
Leal, Tania Slabakova, Roumyana and Farmer, Thomas A. 2017. THE FINE-TUNING OF LINGUISTIC EXPECTATIONS OVER THE COURSE OF L2 LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 39, Issue. 03, p. 493.
Fernandez, Leigh Höhle, Barbara Brock, Jon and Nickels, Lyndsey 2017. Investigating auditory processing of syntactic gaps with L2 speakers using pupillometry. Second Language Research, p. 026765831772238.
Jessen, Anna Festman, Julia Boxell, Oliver and Felser, Claudia 2017. Native and Non-native Speakers’ Brain Responses to Filled Indirect Object Gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 46, Issue. 5, p. 1319.
CUNNINGS, IAN 2017. Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 20, Issue. 04, p. 659.
Rothman, Jason and Slabakova, Roumyana 2017. THE GENERATIVE APPROACH TO SLA AND ITS PLACE IN MODERN SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, p. 1.
Pliatsikas, Christos DeLuca, Vincent Moschopoulou, Elisavet and Saddy, James Douglas 2017. Immersive bilingualism reshapes the core of the brain. Brain Structure and Function, Vol. 222, Issue. 4, p. 1785.
Hopp, Holger 2017. Cross-linguistic lexical and syntactic co-activation in L2 sentence processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 96.
Castro, Tammer Rothman, Jason and Westergaard, Marit 2017. On the Directionality of Cross-Linguistic Effects in Bidialectal Bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8,
Sabourin, Laura L. Burkholder, Michèle Vīnerte, Santa Leclerc, Jean-Christophe and Brien, Christie 2016. Language processing in bilinguals. EUROSLA Yearbook, Vol. 16, p. 1.
HOPP, HOLGER 2016. The timing of lexical and syntactic processes in second language sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 37, Issue. 05, p. 1253.
Pliatsikas, Christos and Chondrogianni, Vicky 2015. Editorial: Learning a non-native language in a naturalistic environment: insights from behavioral and neuroimaging research. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,
Miller, A. Kate 2015. INTERMEDIATE TRACES AND INTERMEDIATE LEARNERS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 37, Issue. 03, p. 487.
Jegerski, Jill 2015. The processing of case in near-native Spanish. Second Language Research, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 281.
Antón, Eneko Thierry, Guillaume Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni and Rodriguez-Fornells, Antoni 2015. Mixing Languages during Learning? Testing the One Subject—One Language Rule. PLOS ONE, Vol. 10, Issue. 6, p. e0130069.
Sanoudaki, Eirini and Thierry, Guillaume 2015. Language non-selective syntactic activation in early bilinguals: the role of verbal fluency. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, Vol. 18, Issue. 5, p. 548.
Caffarra, Sendy Molinaro, Nicola Davidson, Doug and Carreiras, Manuel 2015. Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 51, p. 31.
HOPP, HOLGER 2015. Individual differences in the second language processing of object–subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 36, Issue. 02, p. 129.
Deng, Taiping Zhou, Huixia Bi, Hong-Yan and Chen, Baoguo 2015. Input-based structure-specific proficiency predicts the neural mechanism of adult L2 syntactic processing. Brain Research, Vol. 1610, p. 42.
An ongoing debate on second language (L2) processing revolves around whether or not L2 learners process syntactic information similarly to monolinguals (L1), and what factors lead to a native-like processing. According to the Shallow Structure Hypothesis (Clahsen & Felser, 2006a), L2 learners’ processing does not include abstract syntactic features, such as intermediate gaps of wh-movement, but relies more on lexical/semantic information. Other researchers have suggested that naturalistic L2 exposure can lead to native-like processing (Dussias, 2003). This study investigates the effect of naturalistic exposure in processing wh-dependencies. Twenty-six advanced Greek learners of L2 English with an average nine years of naturalistic exposure, 30 with classroom exposure, and 30 native speakers of English completed a self-paced reading task with sentences involving intermediate gaps. L2 learners with naturalistic exposure showed evidence of native-like processing of the intermediate gaps, suggesting that linguistic immersion can lead to native-like abstract syntactic processing in the L2.
This study was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (Project no.: PTA-030–2006-00359). We would like to thank Giuli Dussias and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive feedback. Additionally, we would like to thank Stavroula-Thaleia Kousta and Gabriella Vigliocco for providing us with space to test some participants at University College London, and also the “Scholars” language school (Kallithea, Greece), Athanassios Protopapas and Eleni Vlahou (University of Athens) for providing us with space to test participants in Greece.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.