Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:49:26.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relevance of language-internal variation in predicting heritage language grammars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2019

Cristina Flores Open the ORCID record for Cristina Flores [Opens in a new window]  and
Esther Rinke
Cristina Flores*
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudos Humanísticos, Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Esther Rinke
Affiliation:
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Germany
*
Address for correspondence: Cristina Flores, E-mail: cflores@ilch.uminho.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 25 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbosa, P, Paiva, C, & Martins, K (2017). Clitic Climbing in the speech of Braga and Lisbon. In Barbosa, P, Paiva, C & Rodrigues, C (eds.), Studies on Variation in Portuguese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp. 200–217.Google Scholar
Cyrino, S, Duarte, E, & Kato, M (2000). Visible subjects and invisible clitics in Brazilian Portuguese. In Kato, M & Negrão, E (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the null subject parameter. Frankfurt: Iberoamericana, pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
Łyskawa, P, & Nagy, N (2019). Case marking variation in heritage Slavic languages in Toronto: Not so different. Language Learning, doi:10.1111/lang.12348. Published online by Wiley Online Library, May 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M and Scontras, G (2019). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000245Google Scholar
Putnam, M, Kupisch, T, & Pascual y Cabo, D (2018). Different situations, similar outcomes: Heritage grammars across the lifespan. In Bayram, F, Denhovska, N, Miller, D, Rothman, J, & Serratrice, L (eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 251–279.Google Scholar
Rinke, E, Flores, C, & Barbosa, P (2018). Null objects in the spontaneous speech of monolingual and bilingual speakers of European Portuguese. Probus 30, 93–119.Google Scholar
Rinke, E, & Flores, C (2014). Heritage Portuguese bilinguals’ morphosyntactic knowledge of clitics. Bilingualism. Language and Cognition 17, 681–699.Google Scholar