Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T05:52:40.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Will this tablet make me happy again? The contribution of relational prescribing in providing a pragmatic and psychodynamic framework for prescribers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2022

Haroula Konstantinidou*
Affiliation:
Consultant medical psychotherapist with Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust and lead clinician at Francis Dixon Lodge, a therapy service for people with personality disorder in Leicester, UK. She has integrated prescribing into an intense mentalisation-based therapy programme. Her research interests are in psychodynamic psychiatry, therapeutic communities and reflective practice.
Dimitrios Chartonas
Affiliation:
Consultant psychiatrist at the Camden and Islington Personality Disorder Service, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. His teaching interest is in personality disorder and psychodynamic psychiatry. His research interest is in personality disorder, Balint and reflective practice groups, and transcultural psychiatry.
David Rogalski
Affiliation:
Senior mental health pharmacist and independent prescriber working for Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust in a single point of access assessment and advice service in inner-city London, UK.
Tennyson Lee
Affiliation:
Consultant in general adult psychiatry and medical psychotherapy with Dean Cross Personality Disorder Service, East London NHS Foundation Trust, UK. He is co-director of the Centre for Understanding of Personality (CUSP). He is an accredited transference-focused psychotherapy supervisor and mentalisation-based treatment practitioner and a candidate at the Institute of Psychoanalysis, London, UK.
*
Correspondence Haroula Konstantinidou. Email: haroula.konstantinidou1@nhs.net

Summary

We describe the importance of relational factors in prescribing practices and discuss how they may influence treatment outcomes. Although relational factors play a part in every clinician–patient interaction, they are particularly relevant when managing patients with complex emotional needs. We discuss how relational prescribing can add value when incorporated into standard practice. We introduce psychodynamic theory principles, and we suggest a framework to facilitate reflection and support decision-making when clinicians are faced with complex prescribing decisions.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adshead, G (1998) Psychiatric staff as attachment figures: understanding management problems in psychiatric services in the light of attachment theory. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172: 64–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balint, M (1955) The doctor, his patient and the Illness. Lancet, 2: 683–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingel, U (2014) Avoiding nocebo effects to optimize treatment outcome. Journal of American Medical Association, 312: 693–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cormack, MA, Howells, E (1992) Factors linked to the prescribing of benzodiazepines by general practice principals and trainees. Family Practice, 9: 466–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delga, C, Megnin, Y, Oustric, S, et al. (2003) A pilot study in general practice: pressure to prescribe. Therapie, 58: 513–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabbard, G (1990) Psychodynamic Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Haigh, R, Benefield, N (2019) Towards a unified model of human development. Mental Health Review Journal, 24: 124–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakovljevic, M (2014) The placebo-nocebo response: controversies and challenges from clinical and research perspective. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 24: 333–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, M (2013) From Osler to the cone technique. HSR Proceedings in Intensive Care & Cardiovascular Anesthesia, 5: 57–8.Google Scholar
Kandel, ER (1999) Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: a new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156: 505–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Main, T (1957) The ailment. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 30: 129–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maltsberger, JT, Buie, DH (1974) Countertransference hate in the treatment of suicidal patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30: 625–33.10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760110049005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martean, L, Evans, C (2014) Prescribing for personality disorder: qualitative study of interviews with general and forensic consultant psychiatrists. Psychiatric Bulletin, 38: 116–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintz, DL, Flynn, DF (2012) How (not what) to prescribe: nonpharmacologic aspects of psychopharmacology. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 35: 143–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintz, D (2022) Psychodynamic Psychopharmacology: Caring for the Treatment-Resistant Patient. American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2009) Borderline Personality Disorder: Treatment and Management (Clinical Guide CG78). NICE.Google Scholar
Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health (2012) Topic 12a Report – Prescribing for People with Personality Disorder. POMH-UK/Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Scott, IA (2009) Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies. BMJ, 338: b1860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stivers, T (2007) Prescribing Under Pressure: Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutter, A (2006) Medication as object. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54: 781804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winnicott, DW (1953) Transitional objects and transitional phenomena; a study of the first not-me possession. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34: 8997.Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.