Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Digitally enabled patients, professionals and providers: making the case for an electronic health record in mental health services

  • Jonathan Richardson (a1) and Joe McDonald (a1)
Summary

The move to a digital health service may improve some components of health systems: information, communication and documentation of care. This article gives a brief definition and history of what is meant by an electronic health record (EHR). There is some evidence of benefits in a number of areas, including legibility, accuracy and the secondary use of information, but there is a need for further research, which may need to use different methodologies to analyse the impact an EHR has on patients, professionals and providers.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Digitally enabled patients, professionals and providers: making the case for an electronic health record in mental health services
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Digitally enabled patients, professionals and providers: making the case for an electronic health record in mental health services
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Digitally enabled patients, professionals and providers: making the case for an electronic health record in mental health services
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Jonathan Richardson (jonathan.richardson@ntw.nhs.uk)
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of interest

J.R. has received sponsorship to attend conferences from pharmaceutical and publishing companies. This article is based on work submitted for an MSc dissertation. J.M. has carried out paid consultancy work for a number of health IT system suppliers and is currently a director of the Open Source Software Foundation Community Interest Company.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1 Smellie, A. The cyber docs will see you now: Too busy to get to the surgery? An online GP is just a click away? Mail Online 2011; 21 February.
2 Prensky, M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 2001; 9: 16. Available at http://marcprensky.com/articles-in-publications/ (accessed 22 January 2016).
3 Toll, E. The cost of technology? JAMA 201; 307: 2497–8.
4 van Bemmel, JH, Musen, MA (eds) Handbook of Medical Informatics. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
5 Morrison, Z, Fernando, B, Karla, D, Cresswell, K, Robertson, A, Hemmi, A, et al. An Evaluation of Different Levels of Structuring within the Clinical Record: Final Report for the NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme (NHS CFHEP 009). University of Edinburgh, 2012 (http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-mds/haps/projects/cfhep/projects/009/NHSCFHEP009FinalReport8thFeb2012.pdf).
6 Jones, E, Rahman, S, Everitt, B. Psychiatric case notes: symptoms of mental illness and their attribution at the Maudsley Hospital, 1924–35. Hist Psychiatry 2012; 23: 156–68.
7 Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. A Clinician's Guide to Record Standards. Part 1: Why Standardise the Structure and Content of Medical Records? AoMRC, 2008 (www.rcplondon.ac.uk/clinical-standards/hiu/medical-records).
8 Royal College of Psychiatrists. A new Mental Health Discharge Summary (press release). Royal College of Psychiatrists, 5 October 2012.
9 Parry, J, Richardson, J, Dixon, L, Mckenna, D. Use of the RCPsych/RCGP Mental Health Discharge Summary (MHDS). Poster presentation at The Royal College of Psychiatrists' International Congress 24–27 June 2014, London.
10 Pullen, I, Loudon, J. Improving standards in clinical record-keeping. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2006; 12: 280–6.
11 Pagliari, C, Detmer, D, Singleton, P. Electronic Personal Health Records: Emergence and Implications for the UK. Nuffield Trust, 2007.
12 Health IT.gov. Meaningful Use Definition & Objectives. Available at http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/meaningful-use-definition-objectives (accessed 22 January 2016).
13 Ham, C, Baird, B, Gregory, S, Jabbal, J, Alderwick, H. The NHS Under the Coalition Government. Part 1: NHS reform. The Kings Fund, 6 February 2015.
14 Department of Health. The Power of Information: Putting All of Us in Control of the Health and Care Information we Need. Department of Health, 2012.
15 National Information Board, Department of Health. Personalised Health and Care 2020: Using Data and Technology to Transform Outcomes for Patients and Citizens. NIB, 2014.
16 General Medical Council. What Makes a Good Doctor? GMC, 2012 (http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/10058.asp).
17 Eysenbach, G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 2001; 3: e20 (http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e20/).
18 Black, AD, Car, J, Pagliari, C, Anandan, C, Cresswell, K, Bokun, T, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview? PLoS Med 2011; 18 January, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387.
19 Jensen, PB, Jensen, LJ, Brunak, S. Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13: 395405.
20 Ennis, L, Rose, D, Callard, F, Denis, M, Wykes, T. Rapid progress or lengthy process? Electronic personal health records in mental health. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11: 117.
21 Ammenwerth, E, Spötl, H-P. The time needed for clinical documentation versus direct patient care: a work-sampling analysis of physicians' activities. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 8491.
22 Farrar, M. Reducing the bureaucracy burden on the NHS? HSJ 2013; 7 March (http://m.hsj.co.uk/5055664.article).
23 Oluoch, T, Santas, X, Kwaro, D, Were, M, Biondich, P, Bailey, C, et al. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review. Int J Med Informatics 2012; 81: 8392.
24 Plsek, P. An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Large-Scale Change, and Its Relevance to the NHS. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, 2008.
25 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Strategy for UK Life Sciences. Office for Life Sciences, 2011 (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32457/11-1429-strategy-for-uk-life-sciences.pdf).
26 Porter, ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2477–81.
27 Peltu, M, Eason, K, Clegg, C. How a Sociotechnical Approach Can Help The National Programme for IT Deliver Better NHS Patient Care. BCS: The Chartered Institute for IT, 2008 (www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/sociotechnical-approach-npfit.pdf).
28 Clegg, C, Ellis, B, Wyatt, JC, Elliot, B, Sinclair, M, Wastell, D. A Manifesto for a Socio-Technical Approach to NHS and Social Care IT-Enabled Business Change – To Deliver Effective High Quality Health and Social Care for All. British Computer Society, 2010 (http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/stmanifesto-260810.pdf).
29 McDonald, J. Joe's view: of The Power of Information. Ehealth Insider 2012; 26 June (http://www.ehi.co.uk/insight/analysis/913/joe'sview:-of-the-power-of-information).
30 Sauro, J. Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Measuring U 2011; 26 February (http://www.measuringusability.com/sus.php).
31 The NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme (CFHEP). Looking back, moving forward – capturing lessons and building the evidence base for health informatics. HSJ 2012, 15 March.
32 Greenhalgh, T, Potts, H, Wong, G, Bark, P, Swinglehurst, D. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Quart 2009; 87: 729–88.
33 Richardson, J, Willis, C, Mckenna, D. Engage clinical NHS staff using mobile technology? HSJ 2015; 27 February (http://www.hsj.co.uk/home/innovation-and-efficiency/engage-clinical-nhs-staff-using-mobile-technology/5081874.article).
34 Foley, T, Fairmichael, F. Learning Healthcare Systems: Emerging Developments and Their Implications. The Learning Healthcare Project, 2015 (http://www.learninghealthcareproject.org/).
35 deBronkart, D. How the e-patient community helped save my life. BMJ 2013; 346: f1990.
36 British Standards Institution, MindTech. Health and Wellness Apps: Quality Criteria Across the Life Cycle. Code of Practice. BSI, 2015.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 2056-4694
  • EISSN: 2056-4708
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 32 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 83 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 23rd July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Digitally enabled patients, professionals and providers: making the case for an electronic health record in mental health services

  • Jonathan Richardson (a1) and Joe McDonald (a1)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *