Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T00:11:24.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing a New Lithium Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Brandon Wong
Affiliation:
West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Kitty Baird*
Affiliation:
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Tom MacLaren
Affiliation:
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The psychiatry liaison team at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (C&W) specialises in working together with different healthcare teams to improve patient outcomes. Following feedback received from ward teams who manage the patients that we support on a daily basis, we identified a need for an accessible and user-friendly document that could give some guidance towards safely managing patients on lithium, including lithium toxicity. We do not anticipate medical teams at C&W to initiate lithium therapy without liaison psychiatry input. The most likely scenario where staff will encounter lithium is in patients admitted whilst on established lithium therapy. The aim of the guidance document is to support our medical and surgical colleagues across the hospital site to safely continue to prescribe lithium.

Methods

To create this document, we reviewed joint Lithium Policies across several NHS Trusts in England. This policy has been adapted from Central and North West London's own policy to be more specific in supporting best practice for clinicians in initiating, monitoring and adjusting lithium therapy in a safe and timely way.

Junior doctors in liaison psychiatry wrote policy which was re-drafted with consultant support and input. Additionally, specialist advice was provided by mental health pharmacists for subsequent revisions. At present, the policy is awaiting discussion at a prescribing group meeting prior to starting the implementation process across the trust.

Results

Multidisciplinary feedback from pharmacy has advised that this guidance is particularly useful because lithium patients are so infrequent (approximately 55 patients on lithium at C&W in a 12 month period). Ward teams are therefore unfamiliar with prescribing and managing lithium, and crucially, at recognising signs and symptoms of toxicity. The guidance is not only functional, but is incredibly accessible. It is well laid out and makes use of colour to make it user-friendly. It is an appropriate length and includes a one page overview that is ideal for printing or for quick-reference.

Conclusion

Developing this lithium policy has been a key patient safety project. We hope this document will be a useful and safe tool for ward teams to refer to. Liaison psychiatry continue to have an excellent relationship with our ward colleagues and we hope this policy represents our ongoing dedication towards service development.

During this process, we have been grateful for the expert help from our pharmacy colleagues and have learnt about how liaison psychiatry can support ward teams by creating a robust and easy to follow guideline.

Type
Psychopharmacology
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.