Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w6wnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-22T15:24:34.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing iSWITCHED (Implementing SWITCHing EDucational Intervention): A Co-Designed Intervention to Support Safer Antipsychotic Switching in Severe Mental Illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Prachi Kaistha
Affiliation:
Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
Megan Beddow
Affiliation:
Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
Tom Kingstone
Affiliation:
Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
Ian Maidment
Affiliation:
Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Saeed Farooq
Affiliation:
Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) face two–three times higher-risk of early death; over 60% are deaths linked to preventable physical health issues. Commonly prescribed antipsychotics (APs) like olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone effectively manage mental health (MH) symptoms but carry serious cardiometabolic risks. Although lower-risk APs have been available for nearly a decade, most patients remain on higher-risk APs as switching to improve cardio-metabolic side-effects is rarely implemented due to clinician uncertainty and relapse concerns. We aimed to co-design an educational intervention to support clinicians in evidence-based AP switching, incorporating input from clinicians, patients and caregivers.

Methods: Our intervention was co-designed iteratively, guided by Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for complex interventions. Work Package (WP) 1 formed exploratory basis for intervention development and included (i) two theory of change (ToC) workshops with clinicians (n=28) to identify barriers and opportunities for supporting people with SMI in switching APs; (ii) evidence review and synthesis of 32 clinical practice guidelines on switching APs; (iii) qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers (n=18) to explore perspectives on switching APs. Findings from WP1 were used to develop and refine intervention in WP2 iteratively through (i) two consensus-building workshops (CBWs) with clinicians and lay members (n=26); (ii) early user-feedback will be generated through ongoing think-aloud interviews and role-play activities.

Results: Insights from ToC workshops (28 MH clinicians), qualitative interviews (13 patients and five caregivers), and CBWs (22 MH clinicians and four lay members) highlighted importance of clear communication, collaborative clinician-patient relationships, clinician training, shared decision-making, and patient support while also addressing system-level barriers like poor integration and time constraints. The co-design approach established iSWITCHED, a five-component intervention to support clinicians in switching patients from higher-risk APs to lower-risk alternatives while promoting SDM between patients, carers, and clinicians. Intervention components include (i) a decision-aid that can be embedded in MH record systems to support clinicians in safely managing AP switches; (ii) peer-reviewed evidence-based guidelines for clinicians on AP switching; (iii) SDM guidelines to engage patients and carers; (iv) clinician training to enhance understanding and application of guidance and tool; (v) patient and clinician leaflets to support switching. Think-aloud interviews with 4 psychiatrists and pharmacists have been conducted so far to refine iSWITCHED.

Conclusion: The iSWITCHED switching intervention combines lived experiences, clinical expertise and integrates seamlessly into existing MH record systems. Before wider-implementation, it will be refined using insights from think-aloud interviews and role-play activities and piloted in a larger feasibility study.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.