Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T10:11:36.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic Evaluation of a Novel Physical Healthcare Advice and Guidance Service in a Mental Health Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Eoin Gogarty
Affiliation:
1Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom 2NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London, London, United Kingdom
Ge Yu
Affiliation:
2NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London, London, United Kingdom 3King’s Health Economics, Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Ioannis Bakolis
Affiliation:
4Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom 5Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Ray McGrath
Affiliation:
6South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom 7King’s Health Partners, Mind and Body Programme, Ground Floor, Counting House, Guy’s Hospital St Thomas St, London, United Kingdom
Fiona Gaughran
Affiliation:
1Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom 2NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London, London, United Kingdom 6South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom 8National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: People with severe mental illnesses experience poorer physical health outcomes compared with the general population, partially related to fragmented care. The Integrating our Mental and Physical Healthcare Systems project implemented an Advice and Guidance Line, supported by colleagues in King’s Health Partners, using the Consultant Connect (CC) app in the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust to enhance collaborative physical healthcare. This study evaluates the app’s impact on inpatient transfers from mental health wards to acute hospitals, focusing on clinical outcomes and cost savings.

Methods: This cost-minimisation analysis used retrospective observational data to analyse electronic health records across a 42-month period (21 months pre- and post-intervention) centred on the CC introduction date in June 2020. The study population was Trust adult inpatients during the study period. Outcome measures were the number of Trust inpatients who attended ED in, or were admitted to, one of the four acute NHS Trusts serving the catchment area. Transfers with a primary COVID-19 diagnosis were excluded. Outcomes are presented as the number of transfers per Trust inpatient bed-year. This divisor accounts for the decrease in bed-days during the pandemic.

Results: In the pre-CC period there were 5,472 Trust inpatients across 7,308 inpatient episodes (1,328.78 bed-years) with 1,834 ED transfers. Post-CC the Trust had 5,362 inpatients across 7,396 episodes (1,183.06 bed-years) with 530 ED transfers. The number of ED transfers per bed-year was 1.38 in the pre-CC period, and 0.45 in the post-CC period, a 68% reduction (p<0.001, Chi-square). Interrupted time-series analysis confirmed this decrease (−0.752, 95%CI [−1.117, −0.386], p<0.001). There was no significant difference in admission rates pre- and post-intervention. Based on recent annual bed occupancy (720.97 bed-years) and costs (£457 per ED transfer), CC prevents approximately 670 transfers annually, generating total Trust savings of £241,720 after deducting annual service costs (£61,698) and annualised implementation costs (£3,000).

Conclusion: While the pandemic contributed to an initial decrease in ED transfers, the reduction was sustained even as overall ED presentations at the four hospitals returned to pre-pandemic levels. There was no change in admissions to acute Trusts, suggesting that the level of care provided was appropriate to need. The Advice and Guidance model appears cost-effective in managing physical health within mental health settings. These findings support wider implementation of similar services across mental health trusts, though further evaluation in a post-pandemic context is warranted.

Information

Type
Rapid-Fire Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.