Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-08T03:24:19.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treating Alzheimer’s Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Collin Chong
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Sian Edney
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Benjamin Jelly
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: The prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is increasing across the world, yet extensive research has not yielded effective curative treatment. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has shown benefits and potential in treating AD. However, there were no recent systematic reviews of the different TCM modalities in treating AD specifically. The primary aim of this systematic review (SR) was to investigate the effectiveness of TCM either as a standalone or adjunct treatment alongside conventional medication for AD. The secondary aim was to provide recommendations for treating AD by exploring the addition of TCM in clinical practice.

Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was performed on Medline, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Web of Science and Scopus, while grey literature was searched on Overton. There were no filters set on the date of publication, language, subject and author. The search terms of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Alzheimer’s disease were searched till 27 July 2024. The studies were screened to target patients with AD, therapies and herbs that have corresponding names in TCM and are randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This led to eleven included RCTs for narrative review and meta-analyses. Study Risk of Bias Assessment and quality assessment were performed. A random effects model was used in the meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of treatments.

Results: A total of 11 randomised controlled trials that comprise 1155 patients with AD were included. The included studies showed that TCM therapies of saffron, cistanches herba, MLC601, and Shenfu or Shenmai with Deproteinized Calf Blood Injection (DCBI) had therapeutic benefits as stand-alone therapy for improving cognitive function in patients with AD. Combined with results from the meta-analyses, bushenhuatanyizhi, Guilingji and Jiannao Yizhi formula also showed potential as stand-alone therapy in improving cognitive function and activities of daily living. Two studies supported adding Dengzhan Shengmai or Huanglian Jiedu decoction as an adjunct to conventional treatment. Hachimijiogan showed some effect in slowing cognitive decline as an adjunct therapy, while Yokukansan can help with managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.

Conclusion: This review adds support to the current literature of the potential of TCM therapies in treating AD. A search on the Chinese databases, investigating the mechanisms behind how these interventions work and using a combination of TCM therapies are potential future studies on alternate forms of treatment for patients with AD.

Information

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.