Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-mqssf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-24T01:22:20.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring Medical Student Experiences of the Use of Escape Rooms as an Innovative Teaching Method Within Undergraduate Psychiatry Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Hanna Mansi
Affiliation:
KMPT, Maidstone, United Kingdom
Rachel Rice
Affiliation:
KMPT, Maidstone, United Kingdom
Lisa Dikomitis
Affiliation:
Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, United Kingdom University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom
Sukhi Shergill
Affiliation:
KMPT, Maidstone, United Kingdom Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, United Kingdom KCL, London, United Kingdom
Joanne Rodda
Affiliation:
KMPT, Maidstone, United Kingdom Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: The study aimed to explore the experience and opinions of third year medical students regarding the use of escape rooms as a teaching modality in undergraduate psychiatry education. This research will help inform whether escape rooms have a viable role in medical education.

Methods: This was a mixed method study using quantitative and qualitative elements. Quantitative data was captured on Likert scales, through survey completion, immediately after completion of an escape room (n=64) based on their psychiatry curriculum at a revision day. The qualitative element of study included two focus groups of students (n=7), who had attended the revision day, to discuss their experience of escape rooms in medical education. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. The transcripts were then analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: 97% of surveyed students found the escape room an enjoyable experience. 57 (89%) students reported a positive improvement in knowledge, with only one student disagreeing. 72% of students reported it had improved their clinical skills. Free text responses included ‘really good revision exercise’ and ‘made revision good fun’. The main themes identified from focus groups were that escape rooms were an interactive and enjoyable learning experience which improved knowledge and allowed students to identify knowledge gaps to focus their revision. They enjoyed working in smaller groups, which they found inclusive, and some students felt this improved their team working skills. Some students found that the timed and competitive element detracted from the educational aspect and negatively impacted team working skills, whilst others valued this.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that escape rooms could provide an innovative approach to teaching methods in undergraduate psychiatry. In this study, students found the escape room an enjoyable and beneficial experience that improved their knowledge, and they perceived a benefit for revision as the day was situated close to final year examinations. Equally, escape rooms could be used in a myriad of other ways to support learning in different contexts. Given the popularity of experiential learning in medical education this may be an option to provide positive experiences in undergraduate psychiatric education as well as meaningful educational experiences.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.