Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T00:20:21.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Satisfied Are Local General Practitioners, Who Are Part of the Brompton and South Kensington Primary Care Networks, With Communications About Patients Referred to the Mental Health Triage and Assessment Team?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Parisah Hussain*
Affiliation:
South Kensington and Chelsea Mental Health Centre, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL), London, United Kingdom
Sarah Marriott
Affiliation:
South Kensington and Chelsea Mental Health Centre, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL), London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The Triage and Assessment Team (T&AT) at South Kensington and Chelsea Mental Health Centre have conducted a research project to assess our written communication with General Practitioners (GPs) in primary care. We are responsible for screening and assessing new patients referred by GPs to the South Kensington and Chelsea Mental Health Centre community mental health team (CMHT) department.The aim is to ensure all patients referred from primary care, receive care from the most appropriate health professional(s) in the timeliest way and that we communicate with their referrer in a timely and helpful manner. We aim to deliver a service that is safe, effective and helpful to patients, carers and their referrers. The purpose of this study is to understand the referrers’ experience of our communications with them when they refer to the T&AT.

Methods

A pre-intervention survey was sent out in November 2022 to GPs who work and are part of the Brompton and South Kensington primary care networks (PCNs).

We received an equal number of responses from Brompton and South Kensington GPs respectively. Quantitative and qualitative data were both collected. We had a cross section of respondents including trainees, salaried GPs and partners.

Results

From the quantitative data, the majority of respondents reported they were reasonably satisfied with our communication with respect to timeliness, clarity and clinical relevance of our communication.

Respondents were less satisfied with the balance struck between clinical detail on the one hand and recommendations for the mental health shared care plan.

A qualitative analysis of respondents all free text comments and identified three main themes: the local referral pathway, the use of SystmOne computer software programme, and recommendations for improving communications between GPs and the T&AT at CMHT.

Conclusion

We have acknowledged concerns about the complex mental health referral pathway together with suggestions about improving the functionality of SystmOne across the GP and CMHT interface into the regular discussions we have with our respective PCNs.

The Triage and Assessment Team are designing improvements to the consistency, timeliness and relevance of our GP communications.

Once these improvements have been implemented, we will send out a post-intervention survey to GPs and reassess their satisfaction levels with our new mode of communication.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.