Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T04:58:33.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Medical Students’ Perceptions of Factors Associated With Their Mental Health and Psychological Well-being

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Aisha Ali Hawsawi*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom Dar Al-Hekma University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Neil Nixon
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Emily Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Elena Nixon
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

In light of growing evidence suggesting that medical students are particularly susceptible to stress and ill health, the need to enhance their psychological well-being has been highlighted as a priority concern in medical education and policy. However, only a few studies have comprehensively addressed both positive and negative contributors to medical students' psychological well-being. Therefore, this study aims to provide a more holistic understanding of medical students' psychological well-being, the coping strategies they use and any barriers they face in seeking support, as well as outline potential areas of improvement within provisional well-being support.

Methods

This qualitative study involves semi-structured interviews with 25 medical students to gain in-depth insight into their experiences and perspectives on the factors influencing their psychological well-being during their medical training. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

The study's results revealed that positive and negative factors influence medical students' psychological well-being. Positive factors such as study-life balance, academic achievement, meaningful relationships with staff and peers and time spent with close friends or family positively influenced students’ psychological well-being; while adverse educational, organisational and cultural factors negatively impacted students' well-being. Additionally, COVID-19 had negatively affected students’ academic, personal and social lives. Medical students mainly used active coping strategies, including planning, acceptance, positive reframing, and seeking support. However, some students reported facing barriers in seeking support, such as fear of stigma, lack of time/support, confidentiality concerns, and difficulty in accessing support. At the same time, there was an expressed need to improve well-being services or resource provision. Students have recommended various solutions to improve mental health support in schools, including addressing cultural and organisational changes within schools, increasing access to resources, reducing the stigma surrounding mental health, and promoting positive factors that support psychological well-being.

Conclusion

The findings highlight the importance of adopting a holistic approach that considers a variety of contributing factors affecting positively as well as negatively medical students’ well-being. It also highlights the need to provide a supportive and nurturing environment in medical schools and offer appropriate support and resources to help students cope with the stress and challenges of medical training.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.