Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

  • Syeda Ferhana Akther (a1), Emma Molyneaux (a2), Ruth Stuart (a3), Sonia Johnson (a4), Alan Simpson (a5) and Sian Oram (a6)...
Abstract
Background

Understanding patient experiences of detention under mental health legislation is crucial to efforts to reform policy and practice.

Aims

To synthesise qualitative evidence on patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation.

Method

Five bibliographic databases were searched, supplemented by reference list screening and citation tracking. Studies were included if they reported on patient experiences of assessment or detention under mental health legislation; reported on patients aged 18 years or older; collected data using qualitative methods; and were reported in peer-reviewed journals. Findings were analysed and synthesised using thematic synthesis.

Results

The review included 56 papers. Themes were generally consistent across studies and related to information and involvement in care, the environment and relationships with staff, as well as the impact of detention on feelings of self-worth and emotional state. The emotional impact of detention and views of its appropriateness varied, but a frequent theme was fear and distress during detention, including in relation to the use of force and restraint. Where staff were perceived as striving to form caring and collaborative relationships with patients despite the coercive nature of treatment, and when clear information was delivered, the negative impact of involuntary care seemed to be reduced.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that involuntary in-patient care is often frightening and distressing, but certain factors were identified that can help reduce negative experiences. Coproduction models may be fruitful in developing new ways of working on in-patient wards that provide more voice to patients and staff, and physical and social environments that are more conducive to recovery.

Declaration of interest

None.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Syeda Akther, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7NF, UK. Email: syeda.akther.16@ucl.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1Novella, EJ. Mental Health Care in the aftermath of deinstitutionalization: a retrospective and prospective view. Health Care Anal 2010; 18: 222–38.
2Zhang, SM, Mellsop, G, Brink, J, Wang, XP. Involuntary admission and treatment of patients with mental disorder. Neurosci Bull 2015; 31: 99112.
3Kallert, TW, Glockner, M, Schutzwohl, M. Involuntary vs. voluntary hospital admission - a systematic literature review on outcome diversity. Eur Arch Psych Clin Neurosci 2008; 258: 195209.
4Keown, P, Murphy, H, McKenna, D, McKinnon, I. Changes in the use of the Mental Health Act 1983 in England 1984/85 to 2015/16. Br J Psychiatry 2018; 213: 595–9.
5Wood, L, Alsawy, S. Patient experiences of psychiatric inpatient care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. J Psychiatr Intensive Care 2016; 12: 3543.
6Csipke, E, Flach, C, McCrone, P, Rose, D, Tilley, J, Wykes, T, et al. Inpatient care 50 years after the process of deinstitutionalisation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014; 49: 665–71.
7Priebe, S, Katsakou, C, Glockner, M, Dembinskas, A, Fiorillo, A, Karastergiou, A, et al. Patients’ views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: prospective study in 11 European countries. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 196: 179–85.
8UK Department of Health and Social Care. Independent Review of the Mental Health Act 1983. Department of Health and Social Care, 2017 (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mental-health-act-independent-review/terms-of-reference-independent-review-of-the-mental-health-act-1983).
9Katsakou, C, Priebe, S. Patient's experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: a review of qualitative studies. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2007; 16: 172–8.
10Seed, T, Fox, JR, Berry, K. The experience of involuntary detention in acute psychiatric care. A review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 61: 8294.
11Giacco, D, Mavromara, L, Gamblen, J, Conneely, M, Priebe, S. Shared decision-making with involuntary hospital patients: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators. BJPsych Open 2018; 4: 113–8.
12Khatib, A, Ibrahim, M, Roe, D. Re-building trust after physical restraint during involuntary psychiatric hospitalization. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2018; 32: 457–61.
13Lanthén, K, Rask, M, Sunnqvist, C. Psychiatric patients experiences with mechanical restraints: an interview study. Psychiatry J 2015; 2015: 748392.
14Stylianidis, S, Peppou, LE, Drakonakis, N, Iatropoulou, G, Nikolaidi, S, Tsikou, K, et al. Patients’ views and experiences of involuntary hospitalization in Greece: a focus group study. Int J Cult Ment Health 2017; Dec 19 (Epub ahead of print).
15Thomas, J, Harden, A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 10.
16Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Qualitative Research Checklist. CASP, 2017.
17Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, Group, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
18Chambers, M, Gallagher, A, Borschmann, R, Gillard, S, Turner, K, Kantaris, X. The experiences of detained mental health service users: issues of dignity in care. BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15: 8.
19Donner, B, Mutter, R, Scior, K. Mainstream in-patient Mental Health Care for people with intellectual disabilities: service user, carer and provider experiences. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2010; 23: 214–25.
20Fenton, K, Larkin, M, Boden, ZVR, Thompson, J, Hickman, G, Newton, E. The experiential impact of hospitalisation in early psychosis: service-user accounts of inpatient environments. Health Place 2014; 30: 234–41.
21Fish, R. Friends and family: regulation and relationships on the locked ward. Disabil Soc 2016; 31: 1385–402.
22Fish, R. ‘Behind This Wall’ - experiences of seclusion on locked wards for women. Scand J Disabil Res 2018; 20: 139–51.
23Fish, R, Hatton, C. Gendered experiences of physical restraint on locked wards for women. Disabil Soc 2017; 32: 790809.
24Gault, I. Service-user and carer perspectives on compliance and compulsory treatment in community mental health services. Health Soc Care Community 2009; 17: 504–13.
25Gault, I, Gallagher, A, Chambers, M. Perspectives on medicine adherence in service users and carers with experience of legally sanctioned detention and medication: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2013; 7: 787–99.
26Gilburt, H, Rose, D, Slade, M. The importance of relationships in mental health care: a qualitative study of service users’ experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 12.
27Gillard, S, Borschmann, R, Turner, K, Goodrich-Purnell, N, Lovell, K, Chambers, M. Producing different analytical narratives, coproducing integrated analytical narrative: a qualitative study of UK detained mental health patient experience involving service user researchers. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2012; 15: 239–54.
28Haw, C, Stubbs, J, Bickle, A, Stewart, I. Coercive treatments in forensic psychiatry: a study of patients’ experiences and preferences. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 2011; 22: 564–85.
29Henderson, J. Experiences of ‘care' in mental health. J Adult Prot 2002; 4: 3445.
30Hughes, R, Hayward, M, Finlay, WML. Patients’ perceptions of the impact of involuntary inpatient care on self, relationships and recovery. J Ment Heal 2009; 18: 152–60.
31Jones, J, Nolan, P, Bowers, L, Simpson, A, Whittington, R, Hackney, D, et al. Psychiatric wards: places of safety? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2010; 17: 124–30.
32Jones, P, Kroese, BS. Service users’ views of physical restraint procedures in secure settings for people with learning disabilities. Br J Learn Disabil 2007; 35: 50–4.
33Katsakou, C, Rose, D, Amos, T, Bowers, L, McCabe, R, Oliver, D, et al. Psychiatric patients’ views on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012; 47: 1169–79.
34Laugharne, R, Priebe, S, McCabe, R, Garland, N, Clifford, D. Trust, choice and power in mental health care: experiences of patients with psychosis. Int J Soc Psychiatr 2012; 58: 496504.
35Loft, NO, Lavender, T. Exploring compulsory admission experiences of adults with psychosis in the UK using Grounded Theory. J Ment Heal 2016; 25: 297302.
36Long, CG, Knight, C, Bradley, L, Thomas, M. Effective therapeutic milieus in secure services for women: the service user perspective. J Ment Heal 2012; 21: 567–78.
37Madders, SAS, George, CA. ‘I couldn't have done it on my own.’ Perspectives of patients preparing for discharge from a UK high secure hospital. Ment Health Rev J 2014; 19: 2736.
38Maltman, L, Stacey, J, Hamilton, L. Peaks and troughs-an exploration of patient perspectives of dangerous and severe personality disorder assessment (Peaks Unit, Rampton Hospital). Personal Ment Health 2008; 2: 716.
39McKeown, M, Jones, F, Foy, P, Wright, K, Paxton, T, Blackmon, M. Looking back, looking forward: recovery journeys in a high secure hospital. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2016; 25: 234–42.
40McNally, C, Beail, N, Kellett, S. The experience of detention under the Mental Health Act (1983). Adv Ment Health Learn Disabil 2007; 1: 4753.
41Ridley, J, Hunter, S. Subjective experiences of compulsory treatment from a qualitative study of early implementation of the Mental Health (Care & Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. Health Soc Care Community 2013; 21: 509–18.
42Riley, G, Freeman, E, Laidlaw, J, Pugh, D. ‘A frightening experience’: detainees’ and carers’ experiences of being detained under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act. Med Sci Law 2011; 51: 164–9.
43Seed, T, Fox, J, Berry, K. Experiences of detention under the Mental Health Act for adults with anorexia nervosa. Clin Psychol Psychother 2016; 23: 352–62.
44Skelly, C. From special hospital to regional secure unit - a qualitative study of the problems experienced by patients. J Adv Nurs 1994; 20: 1056–63.
45Tapp, J, Warren, F, Fife-Schaw, C, Perkins, D, Moore, E. What do the experts by experience tell us about ‘what works’ in high secure forensic inpatient hospital services? J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 2013; 24: 160–78.
46Valenti, E, Giacco, D, Katasakou, C, Priebe, S. Which values are important for patients during involuntary treatment? A qualitative study with psychiatric inpatients. J Med Ethics 2014; 40: 832–6.
47Andreasson, E, Skarsater, I. Patients treated for psychosis and their perceptions of care in compulsory treatment: basis for an action plan. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2012; 19: 1522.
48Hörberg, U, Sjögren, R, Dahlberg, K. To be strategically struggling against resignation: the lived experience of being cared for in forensic psychiatric care. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2012; 33: 743–51.
49Johansson, IM, Lundman, B. Patients’ experience of involuntary psychiatric care: good opportunities and great losses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2002; 9: 639–47.
50Olofsson, B, Jacobsson, L. A plea for respect: involuntarily hospitalized psychiatric patients’ narratives about being subjected to coercion. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2001; 8: 357–66.
51Olofsson, B, Norberg, A. Experiences of coercion in psychiatric care as narrated by patients, nurses and physicians. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33: 8997.
52Olsson, H, Audulv, Å, Strand, S, Kristiansen, L. Reducing or increasing violence in forensic care: a qualitative study of inpatient experiences. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2015; 29: 393400.
53Olsson, H, Strand, S, Kristiansen, L. Reaching a turning point - how patients in forensic care describe trajectories of recovery. Scand J Caring Sci 2014; 28: 505–14.
54Schön, U-K. Recovery in involuntary psychiatric care: is there a gender difference? J Ment Heal 2013; 22: 420–7.
55Bradbury, J, Hutchinson, M, Hurley, J, Stasa, H. Lived experience of involuntary transport under mental health legislation. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2017; 26: 580–92.
56Muir-Cochrane, E, Oster, C, Grotto, J, Gerace, A, Jones, J. The inpatient psychiatric unit as both a safe and unsafe place: implications for absconding. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2013; 22: 304–12.
57Wyder, M, Bland, R, Blythe, A, Matarasso, B, Crompton, D. Therapeutic relationships and involuntary treatment orders: service users’ interactions with health-care professionals on the ward. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2015; 24: 181–9.
58Wyder, M, Bland, R, Crompton, D. The importance of safety, agency and control during involuntary mental health admissions. J Ment Heal 2016; 25: 338–42.
59Wyder, M, Bland, R, Herriot, A, Crompton, D. The experiences of the legal processes of involuntary treatment orders: tension between the legal and medical frameworks. Int J Law Psychiatr 2015; 38: 4450.
60Campbell, J. Stakeholders’ views of legal and advice services for people admitted to psychiatric hospital. J Soc Welfare Family Law 2008; 30: 219–32.
61McGuinness, D, Dowling, M, Trimble, T. Experiences of involuntary admission in an approved mental health centre. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013; 20: 726–34.
62Murphy, R, McGuinness, D, Bainbridge, E, Brosnan, L, Felzmann, H, Keys, M, et al. Service users’ experiences of involuntary hospital admission under the Mental Health Act 2001 in the Republic of Ireland. Psychiatr Serv 2017; 68: 1127–35.
63Murphy, R, McGuinness, D, Bainbridge, E, Brosnan, L, Keys, M, Felzmann, H, et al. Service users’ experiences of mental health tribunals in Ireland: a qualitative analysis. Ir J Psychol Med 2017; 34: 233–42.
64Smyth, S, Casey, D, Cooney, A, Higgins, A, McGuinness, D, Bainbridge, E, et al. Qualitative exploration of stakeholders’ perspectives of involuntary admission under the Mental Health Act 2001 in Ireland. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2017; 26: 554–69.
65Norvoll, R, Pedersen, R. Exploring the views of people with mental health problems’ on the concept of coercion: towards a broader socio-ethical perspective. Soc Sci Med 2016; 156: 204–11.
66Terkelsen, TB, Larsen, IB. The locked psychiatric ward: hotel or detention camp for people with dual diagnosis. J Ment Heal 2013; 22: 412–9.
67Sibitz, I, Scheutz, A, Lakeman, R, Schrank, B, Schaffer, M, Amering, M. Impact of coercive measures on life stories: qualitative study. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 199: 239–44.
68Askola, R, Nikkonen, M, Paavilainen, E, Soininen, P, Putkonen, H, Louheranta, O. Forensic psychiatric patients’ perspectives on their care: 1a narrative view. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2018; 54: 6473.
69Ezeobele, IE, Malecha, AT, Mock, A, Mackey-Godine, A, Hughes, M. Patients’ lived seclusion experience in acute psychiatric hospital in the United States: a qualitative study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2014; 21: 303–12.
70Jankovic, J, Richards, F, Priebe, S. Advance statements in adult mental health. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2010; 16: 448–55.
71Shah, A. Is the mental health review tribunal inherently unfair to patients? Psychiatr Psychol Law 2010; 17: 2531.
72Kallert, TW, Glöckner, M, Onchev, G, Raboch, J, Karastergiou, A, Solomon, Z, et al. The EUNOMIA project on coercion in psychiatry: study design and preliminary data. World Psychiatry 2005; 4: 168.
73Fiorillo, A, De Rosa, C, Del Vecchio, V, Jurjanz, L, Schnall, K, Onchev, G, et al. How to improve clinical practice on involuntary hospital admissions of psychiatric patients: suggestions from the EUNOMIA study. Eur Psychiatry 2011; 26: 201–7.
74Giacco, D, Conneely, M, Masoud, T, Burn, E, Priebe, S. Interventions for involuntary psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review. Eur Psychiatry 2018; 54: 4150.
75Heumann, K, Bock, T, Lincoln, TM. Please do something - no matter what! a nationwide online survey of mental health service users about the use of alternatives to coercive measures. Psychiatr Prax 2017; 44: 8592.
76Azeem, M, Aujla, A, Rammerth, M, Binsfeld, G, Jones, RB. Effectiveness of six core strategies based on trauma informed care in reducing seclusions and restraints at a child and adolescent psychiatric hospital. J Child Adolesc Psychiatry Nurs 2017; 30: 170–4.
77Elliott, DE, Bjelajac, P, Fallor, RD, Markoff, LS, Reed, BG. Trauma-informed or trauma-denied: principles and implementation of trauma-informed services for women. J Community Psychol 2005; 33: 461–77.
78Maguire, T, Young, R, Martin, T. Seclusion reduction in a forensic mental health setting. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2012; 19: 97106.
79Riahi, S, Dawe, IC, Stuckey, MI, Klassen, PE. Implementation of the six core strategies for restraint minimization in a specialized mental health organization. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2016; 54: 32–9.
80Wieman, DA, Camacho-Gonsalves, T, Huckshorn, KA, Leff, S. Multisite study of an evidence-based practice to reduce seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient facilities. Psychiatr Serv 2014; 65: 345–51.
81Larue, C, Dumais, A, Boyer, R, Goulet, MH, Bonin, JP, Baba, N. The experience of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric settings: perspectives of patients. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2013; 34: 317–24.
82Quirk, A, Lelliott, P, Seale, C. Service users’ strategies for managing risk in the volatile environment of an acute psychiatric ward. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59: 2573–83.
83Gerace, A, Oster, C, O'Kane, D, Hayman, CL, Muir-Cochrane, E. Empathic processes during nurse-consumer conflict situations in psychiatric inpatient units: a qualitative study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2018; 27: 92105.
84Bowers, L. Safewards: a new model of conflict and containment on psychiatric wards. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2014; 21: 499508.
85Bowers, L, James, K, Quirk, A, Simpson, A, Stewart, D, Hodsoll, J, et al. Reducing conflict and containment rates on acute psychiatric wards: the Safewards cluster randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2015; 52: 1412–22.
86Stensgaard, L, Andersen, MK, Nordentoft, M, Hjorthøj, C. Implementation of the safewards model to reduce the use of coercive measures in adult psychiatric inpatient units: an interrupted time-series analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2018; 105: 147–52.
87Higgins, N, Meehan, T, Dart, N, Kilshaw, M, Fawcett, L. Implementation of the safewards model in public mental health facilities: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions. Int J Nurs Stud 2018; 88: 114–20.
88Berger, R. Now I see it, now I don't: researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res 2015; 15: 219–34.
89Orb, A, Eisenhauer, L, Wynaden, D. Ethics in qualitative research. J Nurs Scholarsh 2001; 33: 93–6.
90Gajwani, R, Parsons, H, Birchwood, M, Singh, SP. Ethnicity and detention: are Black and minority ethnic (BME) groups disproportionately detained under the Mental Health Act 2007? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2016; 51: 703–11.
91Bhui, K, Ullrich, S, Kallis, C, Coid, JW. Criminal justice pathways to psychiatric care for psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2015; 207: 523–9.
92Totman, J, Hundt, GL, Wearn, E, Paul, M, Johnson, S. Factors affecting staff morale on inpatient mental health wards in England: a qualitative investigation. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11: 10.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Open
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2056-4724
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-open
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Akther et al. supplementary material
Akther et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (38 KB)
38 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

  • Syeda Ferhana Akther (a1), Emma Molyneaux (a2), Ruth Stuart (a3), Sonia Johnson (a4), Alan Simpson (a5) and Sian Oram (a6)...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *