Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T16:45:19.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RANZCP Commitment to People With Intellectual and Developmental Disability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Elizabeth Moore*
Affiliation:
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Melbourne, Australia. Office for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To provide an overview of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ (RANZCP) work to improve support for those with an intellectual or developmental disability.

Methods

People with intellectual disability experience significantly higher rates of physical and mental health conditions in comparison to the general population. However, there can be multiple barriers to effective health care including, but not limited to, stigma and discrimination, the training of health professionals and a failure to consider the specific needs of people with intellectual disability in health and disability policy leading to deficits in funding to support generic services or develop specialist service models.

In Australia, a Disability Royal Commission was established in 2019 in response to community concern about reports of violence against, and the neglect, abuse and exploitation of, people with disability. The RANZCP has provided information to the Royal Commission and appeared at a public hearing focused on the education and training of health professionals in relation to people with cognitive disability. In 2022, the RANZCP published new position statements on autism and intellectual disability to address the unmet needs faced by people with autism and intellectual disability and provide a foundation for future College advocacy for improving resourcing and mental health support for these groups.

Results

The new RANZCP position statements on autism and intellectual disability make a number of systemic recommendations to address the mental health needs of autistic people and intellectual disability including:

  • providing adequate funding to ensure appropriate policy implementation

  • educating and training health providers in the mental health needs of autistic people and people with intellectual disability

  • including the voices of autistic people to support a more inclusive approach to policy development and service design

  • collecting data on the needs of people with intellectual disability who are living with mental health conditions to support better service planning and better health outcomes.

  • In response to recommendations from the Disability Royal Commission, the RANZCP is also revising its training syllabus to include additional requirements for cognitive disability and has reviewed its CPD program to determine whether CPD for the provision of health care to people with intellectual disability should be enhanced.

Conclusion

The RANZCP is committed to addressing the unmet mental health needs and significant challenges of people with autism and intellectual disability and advocating for improving resourcing and mental health support for these groups.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.