An on-call email system was put in place to facilitate communication between wards and the on-call doctor, allowing prioritisation of duties according to green, amber and red tasks. Information regarding the patient, nature of request and clinical background are expected in the request form. The doctor is expected to respond to the email within 45 minutes. We completed a re-audit to compare if expected standards were reached in practice and attempt to find any areas of practice that could be improved.

We collected information on request forms, presence of adequate information and response time by reviewing the Teesside on-call email inbox. One day was randomly chosen from each week for a 24 month period and all emails were reviewed from chosen days. This amounted to (N=680) emails. The compliance was measured against local trust criteria with expected standard of 100%. We assessed four parameters of completion of request forms, providing adequate information including clinical information, patient identification and location, and response within 45 minutes by the doctor.

The compliance in all four standards was subpar, with notable decrease in compliance from previous results. Compliance was less than 70% across all standards, where previously three standards were above this mark. There was a notable increase in requests with inappropriate tasks defined as non-urgent tasks as per trust guidelines.

Better communication can be ensured with use of SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) in the request forms. Mutual sharing of information between doctors, nursing staff and administration with regard to appropriate written communication could constitute the base for structural change and improvement within the workplace. New staff members and doctors should be inducted with regards to the process of on-call email communication. Regular re-auditing and sharing of results is essential to the monitoring of change in compliance.