Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:50:03.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Zoe Moore*
Affiliation:
Belfast Health and Social CareTrust
Rachel Morrow
Affiliation:
Belfast Health and Social CareTrust
Meta McGee
Affiliation:
Belfast Health and Social CareTrust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Project aim:

To reduce the use of oral psychotropic PRN* medication on Ward 3 AMHIC (Acute Mental Health Inpatient Centre) by 20% by May 2020

(*PRN = Pro re nata/As required)

On Ward 3, we identified a number of unintended negative consequences of PRN medication to both patients and staff.

These included issues with over-use, dependence and side effects; as well as loss of staff ownership and challenging interactions with patients, (including escalation to aggression).

Following the success of our Child and Adolescent Mental Health Inpatient colleagues in this area, we decided to embark on a project to change practice within our ward.

Method

In order to quantify the problem, we first collected baseline data on current use of psychotropic PRN medication.

As a multidisciplinary project team, we then brainstormed potential contributory factors and displayed these visually as a driver diagram.

This divided our project into 3 main areas:

  1. 1) Safe prescribing

  2. 2) Safe administration,

  3. 3) Safety culture.

Project measures were also agreed as follows:

Outcome: Number of doses of oral psychotropic PRN medication administered per week

Balancing: Violent incidents; IM administrations of psychotropic medication

Process: Time taken to complete interventions; Patient and staff satisfaction. Change ideas were selected and implemented sequentially, using Plan-Do-Study- Act methodology.

These included:

  1. 1) Weekly review of PRN prescribing

  2. 2) Nursing administration sheet

Data were collected weekly and plotted on our run chart.

Result

By the end of May 2020, we had exceeded our initial goal, reducing the weekly median number of doses of oral psychotropic PRN medication administered by over 30%.

Our balancing measures remained stable and we gained useful insights and development ideas from a staff survey.

Further change ideas were planned for implementation over the months that followed, however, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic meant that the project lost some momentum.

Conclusion

Despite running into some difficulty over recent months, the team remain motivated to maintain and build upon our previous success.

In the past few weeks, “Calm Cards”, (a patient-centred intervention promoting use of individualised alternative coping strategies), have been introduced.

We hope that the outcomes of this intervention will be positive, both in terms of further reducing use of PRN medication and encouraging development of skills which can be utilised beyond the hospital environment.

We also intend to share our learning with colleagues and explore the possibility of introducing the project to other wards within the hospital.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.