Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Poerbodipoero, Soemitro J. Sturkenboom, Ingrid H. van Hartingsveldt, Margo J. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G. and Graff, Maud J. 2016. The construct validity of the Dutch version of the activity card sort. Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 38, Issue. 19, p. 1943.

    Eriksson, G. Baum, M. C. Wolf, T. J. and Connor, L. T. 2013. Perceived Participation After Stroke: The Influence of Activity Retention, Reintegration, and Perceived Recovery. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 67, Issue. 6, p. e131.


Activity Participation Differences Between Younger and Older Individuals with Stroke

  • Timothy J. Wolf (a1), Joseph K. Brey (a1), Carolyn Baum (a1) and Lisa Tabor Connor (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 June 2012

The purpose of this study was to describe differences in activity participation between younger and older individuals with stroke to inform transition after stroke. This was a cross-sectional study with individuals six-months poststroke (n = 177). All individuals completed an outcomes assessment battery that included the Stroke Impact Scale, the Reintegration to Normal Living Index and the Activity Card Sort. The sample was divided into two groups: (1) Young — those under the age of 65 (n = 89); and (2) Old — those 65 or older (n = 88). Analysis was completed to examine differences between the groups on the primary outcome measures of the study and to look at differences between the groups on individual questions/items on the specific measures. The results of this study demonstrate: (1) significant differences in both the quantity and nature of activity participation prior to and after stroke between younger and older stroke survivors and (2) total scores and measures of central tendency do not necessarily provide therapists with the information they need to guide treatment. Rehabilitation professionals should focus on providing clients with the tools they will need to be successful in transitioning back to home and community environments once rehabilitation has ended.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Timothy J. Wolf, Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8505, 4444 Forest Park, St. Louis, MO 63108USA. E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D.L. Brown , B. Boden-Albala , K.M. Langa , L.D. Lisabeth , M. Fair , M.A. Smith , . . . L.B. Morgenstern (2006). Projected costs of ischemic stroke in the United States. Neurology, 67 (8), 13901395.

B.D. Carpenter , D.F. Edwards , D.F. Pickard , J.L. Palmer , N. Morrow-Howell , P.S. Neufeld , . . . J.C. Morris (2007). Anticipating relocation: Concerns about moving among NORC residents. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49, 165184.

C.A. Cott , R. Wiles , & R. Devitt (2007). Continuity, transition and participation: Preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disability & Rehabilitation, 29 (20–21), 15661574.

P.W. Duncan , S.M. Lai , R.K. Bode , S. Perera , & J. DeRosa (2003). Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function. Neurology, 60 (2), 291296.

P.W. Duncan , D. Wallace , S.M. Lai , D. Johnson , S. Embretson , & L.J. Laster (1999). The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 21312140.

B. Edwards , & B. O'Connell (2003). Internal consistency and validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0) and SIS-16 in an Australian sample. Quality of Life Research, 12, 11271135.

D. Edwards , M. Hahn , C. Baum , & A. Dromerick (2006). The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 15 (4), 151157.

A. Hartman-Maeir , N. Soroker , H. Ring , N. Avni , & N. Katz (2007). Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disability & Rehabilitation, 29 (7), 559566.

P. Kersten , J.T.S. Low , A. Ashburn , S L. George , & D.L. McLellan (2002). The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24 (16), 860866.

N.E. Mayo , S. Wood-Dauphinee , R. Cote , L. Durcan , & J. Carlton (2002). Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 83 (8), 10351042.

V.L. Roger , A.S. Go , D.M. Lloyd-Jones , R.J. Adams , J.D. Berry , T.M. Brown , . . . J. Wylie-Rosett (2011). Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 123 (4), e18e209.

M. Snogren , & K.S. Sunnerhagen (2009). Description of functional disability among younger stroke patients: Exploration of activity and participation and environmental factors. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 32 (2), 124131.

S.L. Stark , D.F. Edwards , H. Hollingsworth , & D.B. Gray (2005). Validation of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a population of community-dwelling people with mobility limitations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 344345.

T.J. Wolf , C. Baum , & L.T. Connor (2009). Changing face of stroke: Implications for occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (5), 621625.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Brain Impairment
  • ISSN: 1443-9646
  • EISSN: 1839-5252
  • URL: /core/journals/brain-impairment
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *