The standard pattern of Gallic local magistracies, so familar to all students of the Roman west, is apparently very straightforward. The progression of the tribal decurion from quaestorship (dealing with finance) to aedileship (dealing with administration) to duumvirate (the chief magisterial office, dealing especially with justice) is repeated by modern authorities time and again more or less as an absolute fact of civitas-life. In such circumstances one would be perfectly justified in assuming that the existence of this system was supported by a strong body of indigenous evidence; however, any close examination soon reveals that the theory as postulated is not derived from information available from the Three Gauls. A careful reading of Jullian's influential account of the Gallo-Roman magistracies shows that the greater part of his examples were drawn, not from Gaul as a whole, but from the grossly atypical province of Narbonensis, with its mass of colonies. Moreover, when even Narbonese evidence was lacking, such emphasis on highly-Romanized administrative practices allowed him to introduce the results of the vast amount of work done on the coloniae and municipia of Italy and Spain. In short, as far as the civitates of the Three Gauls are concerned, the prevailing orthodoxy as to the local career-patterns supposedly followed by their ruling aristocracies is derived not from peregrine Gallic communities but from Roman and Latin settlements clustered around the western Mediterranean.