Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 September 2013
The unrolling of Egyptian mummies was a popular spectacle in mid-nineteenth-century Britain. In hospitals, theatres, homes and learned institutions mummified bodies, brought from Egypt as souvenirs or curiosities, were opened and examined in front of rapt audiences. The scientific study of mummies emerged within the contexts of early nineteenth-century Egyptomania, particularly following the decipherment of hieroglyphics in 1822, and the changing attitudes towards medicine, anatomy and the corpse that led to the 1832 Anatomy Act. The best-known mummy unroller of this period was the surgeon and antiquary Thomas Pettigrew, author of the highly respected History of Egyptian Mummies. By examining the locations, audiences and formats of some of Pettigrew's unrollings this paper outlines a historical geography of mummy studies within the intellectual worlds of nineteenth-century Britain, illuminating the patterns of authority, respectability, place and performance that Pettigrew and his colleagues navigated with varying degrees of success.
1 Pettigrew, Thomas Joseph, A History of Egyptian Mummies and an Account of the Worship and Embalming of the Sacred Animals by the Egyptians; with Remarks on the Funeral Ceremonies of Different Nations and Observations on the Mummies of the Canary Islands, of the Ancient Peruvians, Burman Priests, &c., London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, 1834Google Scholar.
2 ‘Literary and learned’, Literary Gazette, 10 June 1848, p. 394.
3 Dunkin, Alfred John, Report of the Transactions and Excursions of the British Archaeological Association at Their First Congress, at Canterbury, MDXXXXLIV &c &c., London: John Russell Smith, 1844, p. 351Google Scholar.
4 ‘Egyptian mummies’, Chambers's Edinburgh Journal (1834) 118, pp. 110–111.
5 ‘Literary and learned’, op. cit. (2), p. 394.
6 Sawday, Jonathan, The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture, London: Routledge, 1995Google Scholar.
7 David M. Wetherall, ‘The British Archaeological Association: its foundation and split’, unpublished MA thesis, University of Durham, 1991.
8 Shapin, Steven, ‘The house of experiment in seventeenth-century England’, Isis (1988) 79, pp. 373–404, 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Livingston, David, Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003, pp. 85–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Livingstone, op. cit. (9), p. 85; Lightman, Bernard, Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, p. 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Schaffer, Simon, ‘Natural philosophy and public spectacle in the eighteenth century’, History of Science (1983) 21, pp. 1–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, 1.
12 Morus, Iwan Rhys, ‘Seeing and believing science’, Isis (2006) 97, pp. 101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 102.
13 Buck-Morss, Susan, ‘Dream world of mass culture: Walter Benjamin's theory of modernity and the dialectics of seeing’, in Levin, David M. (ed.), Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993, pp. 309–338Google Scholar; Crary, Jonathan, Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992Google Scholar; Pomata, Gianna, ‘Observation rising: birth of an epistemic genre, 1500–1650’, in Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth (eds.), Histories of Scientific Observation, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011, pp. 45–80Google Scholar, 54.
14 Day, Jasmine, The Mummy's Curse: Mummymania in the English-Speaking World, London: Routledge, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 David, Rosalie, ‘Egyptian mummies: an overview’, in David, (ed.), Egyptian Mummies and Modern Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Pettigrew, op. cit. (1); Wilkinson, John Gardner, A Popular Account of the Ancient Egyptians, vol. 2, London: John Murray, 1878Google Scholar.
17 David, Rosalie, ‘Early investigations of mummies’, in David, Rosalie and Tapp, Edmund (eds.), The Mummy's Tale: The Scientific and Medical Investigation of Natsef-Amun, Priest of the Temple at Karnak, London: Michael O'Mara, 1992, pp. 11–19Google Scholar, 11; Chalmers, Gordon K., ‘Hieroglyphs and Sir Thomas Browne’, Virginia Quarterly Review (1935) 11, pp. 547–560Google Scholar.
18 Dannenfeldt, Karl H., ‘Egypt and Egyptian antiquities in the Renaissance’, Studies in the Renaissance (1959) 6, pp. 7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 19.
19 Kipling, Rudyard, Something of Myself for My Friends Known and Unknown, London: Macmillan, 1937, p. 13Google Scholar.
20 Findlen, Paula, Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994Google Scholar; Findlen, (ed.), Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man Who Knew Everything, London: Routledge, 2004Google Scholar.
21 Dannenfeldt, op. cit. (18), p. 22.
22 Findlen, Possessing Nature, op. cit. (20), p. 221, original emphasis.
23 Steele, Richard, ‘From my own apartment, August 25th. By Isaac Bickerstaff Esq.’, The Tatler (1710), p. 216Google Scholar.
24 Babraj, Krzysztof, ‘The ethics of research on mummified human remains’, in Szymańska, Hanna and Babraj, Krzysztof (eds.), Mummy: Results of an Interdisciplinary Examination of the Egyptian Mummy of Aset-iri-khet-es from the Archaeological Museum in Cracow, Cracow: Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2001, pp. 11–21Google Scholar; Gryphius, Andreas, Mumiae Wratislavienses, Wratislaviae: Viti Jacobi Drescheri, 1662Google Scholar.
25 Middleton, Conyers, Germana Quaedam Antiquitatis Eruditae Monumenta: Quibus Romanorum Veterum Ritus Varii Tam Sacri Quam Profani, Tum Graecorum Atque Aegyptiorum Nonnulli, London: R. Manby & H.S. Cox, 1745Google Scholar.
26 Hadley, John, ‘An account of a mummy, inspected at London 1763’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (1764) 54, pp. 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Blumenbach, John Frederick, ‘Observations on some Egyptian mummies opened in London’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (1794) 84, pp. 177–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 177.
28 Granville, Augustus Bozzi, ‘An essay on Egyptian mummies: with observations on the art of embalming among Ancient Egyptians’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (1825) 115, pp. 269–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 279.
29 Granville, op. cit. (28), p. 298.
30 Donoghue, Helen D., Lee, Oona Y.-C., Minnikin, David E., Besra, Gurdyal S., Taylor, John H. and Spigelman, Mark, ‘Tuberculosis in Dr Granville's mummy: a molecular re-examination of the earliest known Egyptian mummy to be scientifically examined and given a medical diagnosis’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B (2010) 277, pp. 51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
31 Moser, Stephanie, Wondrous Curiosities: Ancient Egypt at the British Museum, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006Google Scholar.
33 Wortham, David John, The Genesis of British Egyptology 1549–1906, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1971, p. 60Google Scholar.
34 Manley, Deborah and Rée, Peta, Henry Salt: Artist, Traveller, Diplomat, Egyptologist, London: Libri, 2001Google Scholar.
35 Dawson, Warren, ‘Anastasi, Sallier and Harris and their papyri’, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology (1949) 35, pp. 158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 161.
36 Edward William Lane to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 12 May 1838, British Library Additional Manuscripts (subsequently BL), 56230, 3.
37 Thompson, Jason, Sir Gardner Wilkinson and His Circle, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1992Google Scholar.
38 John Gardner Wilkinson to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, n.d., BL 56230, 205.
39 Morus, Iwan Rhys, ‘Placing performance’, Isis (2010) 101, pp. 775–778CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
40 Shapin, Steven, Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as if It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010, p. iiiGoogle Scholar.
41 Dawson's study of Pettigrew is for the most part descriptive, characterized by a diligence in research and a near-total lack of critical reflection on any aspect of the work. While I do not wish to denigrate Dawson's efforts in the study of Egyptology, mummification, the life and work of Pettigrew or any other aspect of his work, his notebooks demonstrate that he was clearly aware of the many problematic aspects of Pettigrew's character, and must have chosen to omit them from his study.
42 Aufderheide, Arthur, The Scientific Study of Mummies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003Google Scholar; Brier, Bob, Egyptian Mummies: Unravelling the Secrets of an Ancient Art, London: Michael O'Mara Books, 1996, pp. 158–166Google Scholar.
43 Wetherall, op. cit. (7); Evans, Joan, A History of the Society of Antiquaries, Oxford: Society of Antiquaries of London, 1956, p. 254Google Scholar; Hall, Marie Boas, All Scientists Now: The Royal Society in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 52–54Google Scholar; Minney, R.J., The Two Pillars of Charing Cross: The Story of a Famous Hospital, London: Cassell, 1967Google Scholar; Morrell, Jack and Thackray, Arnold, Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981, p. 56Google Scholar.
44 Francis Palgrave to Dawson Turner, 20 June 1845, BL 56288, 251.
45 Hugo, Thomas, A Letter to the Late Members of the British Archaeological Association, in Answer to a Pamphlet of Mr. Thomas Joseph Pettigrew. By the Rev. Thomas Hugo, Formerly Secretary of the Association, Society of Antiquaries of London Bound Tracts 86, n.d., p. 4Google Scholar.
46 Pettigrew, Thomas Joseph, ‘Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, F.R.S., F.S.A., F.L.S., &c. &c. &c.’, in Pettigrew, (ed.) Medical Portrait Gallery: Biographical Memoirs of the Most Celebrated Physicians, Surgeons, etc. Who Have Contributed to the Advancement of Medical Science, vol. 4, London: Whittaker, 1840, pp. 1–40Google Scholar, 3.
47 Lawrence, Christopher and Macdonald, Fiona A., Sambrook Court: The Letters of J.C. Lettsom at the Medical Society of London, London: Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine, 2003Google Scholar.
48 James, Frank, The Correspondence of Michael Faraday, vol. 2: 1832–December 1840. Letters 525–1333, London: Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1993Google Scholar.
49 Dawson, Warren, Memoir of Thomas Pettigrew F.R.C.S., F.R.S., F.S.A. (1791–1865), New York: Medical Life Press, 1931Google Scholar.
50 Dawson, op. cit. (49).
51 Minney, op. cit. (43).
52 Pettigrew, op. cit. (46).
53 Dawson, op. cit. (49).
54 Evans, op. cit. (43), p. 227; Hall, op. cit. (43).
55 Wright, Thomas, Archaeological Album, or Museum of National Antiquities, London: Chapman & Hall, 1845Google Scholar.
56 Dawson, op. cit. (49).
57 Pettigrew, Thomas Joseph, ‘Account of the examination of the mummy of PET-MAUT-IOH-MES, brought from Egypt by the late John Gosset, Esq. and deposited in the Museum of the Island of Jersey’, Archaeologia (1838) 27, pp. 262–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pettigrew, , ‘Observations on the practice of embalming among the Ancient Egyptians, illustrated by the unrolling of a Mummy from Thebes, Presented to the Association by Joseph Arden, Esq., F.S.A., for the Worcester Congress’, Journal of the British Archaeological Association (1849) 4, pp. 337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
58 Dawson, Warren, ‘Pettigrew's demonstrations upon mummies: A chapter in the history of Egyptology’, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology (1934) 20, pp. 170–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 171.
59 Pettigrew, op. cit. (1), p. xvi.
60 ‘Varieties’, New Monthly Magazine and Literary Journal (1833) 38(149), pp. 111–113.
61 ‘Arts and sciences’, Literary Gazette (13 April 1833) 847, pp. 233–234, 234.
62 Pettigrew, op. cit. (1), p. xvi.
63 ‘Arts and sciences’, op. cit. (61), p. 234.
64 Lyon Playfair to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 17 March 1852, BL 56230, 92.
65 ‘Arts and sciences’, op. cit. (61), p. 234.
66 ‘Antiquarian researches’, Gentleman's Magazine (April 1833), pp. 355–358.
67 Dawson, op. cit. (58), p. 172.
68 Dawson, op. cit. (58), p. 173.
69 ‘Spirit of discovery’, Mirror of Literature, Amusement and Instruction (1 February 1834) 23, pp. 74–76, 74.
70 Clift quoted in Dawson, op. cit. (58), p. 173.
71 ‘Spirit of discovery’, op. cit. (69), p. 75.
72 ‘Spirit of discovery’, op. cit. (69), p. 75.
73 ‘Spirit of discovery’, op. cit. (69), p. 76.
74 ‘Egyptian mummies’, op. cit. (4), p. 110.
75 ‘Proceedings of societies’, New Monthly Magazine and Literary Journal (1834) 40, 158, pp. 254–258, 258.
76 ‘History of Egyptian mummies’, The Athenaeum (19 April 1834) 338, pp. 281–283; ‘Pettigrew on Egyptian mummies’, Monthly Review (1834) 2, pp. 234–242.
77 Warren Dawson papers, BL 56271, 3, 57.
78 John Lubbock to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 28 June, BL 56230, 46.
79 Charles Ferguson Forbes to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 26 May 1833, BL 53604, 117.
80 Ferdinand dal Pozzo to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 29 March 1837, Beinecke Rare Books and Manuscripts Library, Osborne Collection (subsequently OSB), Box 19, Folder 985.
81 Charles Bennet to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 11 June 1833, OSB 11, 521.
82 Dawson, op. cit. (49), pp. 72–73.
83 Pettigrew, op. cit. (1), p. xix, original emphasis.
84 Pettigrew, Thomas Joseph, ‘Account of the unrolling of an Egyptian mummy, with incidental notes of the manners, customs, and religion, of the Ancient Egyptians’, Magazine of Popular Science and Journal of Useful Arts (1836) 2, pp. 17–40Google Scholar, 40.
85 George Squibb to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, n.d., OSB 19, 1043.
86 Pettigrew, op. cit. (84), p. 17, my emphases.
87 Pettigrew, op. cit. (84), p. 17.
88 Pettigrew, op. cit. (84), p. 17.
89 Wilson, David, The British Museum: A History, London: British Museum Press, 2002, p. 91Google Scholar.
90 Charles Barnwell to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 26 May 1836, BL 56229, 16.
91 Samuel Birch to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 1 September 1837, BL 56229, 27.
92 Samuel Birch to Thomas Joseph Pettigrew, 8 September 1842, BL 56229, 38.
93 Warren Dawson papers, BL 56271, 9, 229.
94 Ikram, Selima and Dodson, Aidan, The Mummy in Ancient Egypt: Equipping the Dead for Eternity, London: Thames & Hudson, 1998, p. 71Google Scholar.
95 Birch, Samuel, ‘On a mummy opened at Stafford House, on the 15th July, 1875’, Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology (1877) 5, pp. 122–126Google Scholar.
96 Dawson, op. cit. (58), Plate xxii.
97 Dawson, op. cit. (58), p. 176.
98 ‘Unrolling a mummy’, The Times, 11 April, 1837, p. 5.
99 ‘Scientific mummery’, Figaro in London (1837) 6, p. 58.
101 Alberti, Samuel, ‘The museum affect: visiting collections of anatomy and natural history’, in Fyfe, Aileen and Lightman, Bernard (eds.), Science in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century Sites and Experiences, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, pp. 371–403Google Scholar, 391.
102 Davidson, John, An Address on Embalming Generally Delivered at the Royal Institution on the Unrolling of a Mummy, London: James Ridgeway, Piccadilly, 1833Google Scholar.
103 Shapin, Steven, ‘The invisible technician’, American Scientist (1989) 77, pp. 554–563Google Scholar.
104 Stanley, Peter, For Fear of Pain: British Surgery 1790–1850, Amsterdam: Rodopi/Clio Medica, 2003, p. 31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
106 Dawson, op. cit. (58), p. 176.
107 ‘Unrolling a mummy’, The Times, 7 March, 1837, p. 5.
108 Geary, Patrick, ‘Sacred commodities: the circulation of medieval relics’, in Appadurai, Arjun (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 169–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
109 Abdel-Hakim, Sahar Sobhi, ‘Silent travellers, articulate mummies, “Mummy Pettigrew” and the discourse of the dead’, in Starkey, Paul and El Kholy, Nadia (eds.), Egypt through the Eyes of Travellers, Durham: ASTENE, 2002, pp. 121–148Google Scholar; Hamam, Iman, ‘“A race for incorporation”: Ancient Egypt and its mummies in science and popular culture’, in Pearson, Richard (ed.), The Victorians and the Ancient World: Archaeology and Classicism in Nineteenth-Century Culture, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2006, pp. 25–40Google Scholar.
110 Pettigrew, op. cit. (1), p. xvii.