Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Deville, Joe Guggenheim, Michael and Hrdličková, Zuzana 2014. Concrete governmentality: shelters and the transformations of preparedness. The Sociological Review, Vol. 62, p. 183.

    Leslie, Stuart W. 2013. Aerospaces: Southern California architecture in a cold war world. History and Technology, Vol. 29, Issue. 4, p. 331.

    Nieto-Galan, Agustí 2013. From Papers to Newspapers: Miguel Masriera (1901–1981) and the Role of Science Popularization under the Franco Regime. Science in Context, Vol. 26, Issue. 03, p. 527.

    HOGG, JONATHAN and LAUCHT, CHRISTOPH 2012. Introduction: British nuclear culture. The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 45, Issue. 04, p. 479.

    MAGUIRE, RICHARD 2012. ‘Never a credible weapon’: nuclear cultures in British government during the era of the H-bomb. The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 45, Issue. 04, p. 519.

    Hale, Matthew Raymond, Graham and Wright, Catherine 2011. List of publications on the economic and social history of Great Britain and Ireland published in 2010. The Economic History Review, Vol. 64, Issue. 4, p. 1336.

  • The British Journal for the History of Science, Volume 43, Issue 2
  • June 2010, pp. 149-180

Architects of Armageddon: the Home Office Scientific Advisers' Branch and civil defence in Britain, 1945–68†

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 08 October 2009

In 1948, in response to the perceived threat of atomic war, the British government embarked on a new civil defence programme. By the mid-1950s, secret government reports were already warning that this programme would be completely inadequate to deal with a nuclear attack. The government responded to these warnings by cutting civil defence spending, while issuing apparently absurd pamphlets advising the public on how they could protect themselves from nuclear attack. Historians have thus far sought to explain this response with reference to high-level decisions taken by policymakers, and have tended to dismiss civil defence advice as mere propaganda. This paper challenges this interpretation by considering the little-known role of the Home Office Scientific Advisers' Branch, a group of experts whose scientific and technical knowledge informed both civil defence policy and advice to the public. It explores both their advisory and research work, demonstrating their role in shaping civil defence policy and showing that detailed research programmes lay behind the much-mocked government civil defence pamphlets of the 1950s and 1960s.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Hughes , ‘The Strath Report: Britain confronts the H-bomb, 1954–1955’, History and Technology (2003) 19, 257–75

Matthew Grant , ‘Home Defence and the Sandys Defence White Paper, 1957’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2008), 31, 925–49

J. Agar and B. Balmer , ‘British scientists and the Cold War: the Defence Research Policy Committee and information networks, 1947–63’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences (1998), 28, 209–52

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *