Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Deceived by orchids: sex, science, fiction and Darwin

  • JIM ENDERSBY (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Between 1916 and 1927, botanists in several countries independently resolved three problems that had mystified earlier naturalists – including Charles Darwin: how did the many species of orchid that did not produce nectar persuade insects to pollinate them? Why did some orchid flowers seem to mimic insects? And why should a native British orchid suffer ‘attacks’ from a bee? Half a century after Darwin's death, these three mysteries were shown to be aspects of a phenomenon now known as pseudocopulation, whereby male insects are deceived into attempting to mate with the orchid's flowers, which mimic female insects; the males then carry the flower's pollen with them when they move on to try the next deceptive orchid. Early twentieth-century botanists were able to see what their predecessors had not because orchids (along with other plants) had undergone an imaginative re-creation: Darwin's science was appropriated by popular interpreters of science, including the novelist Grant Allen; then H.G. Wells imagined orchids as killers (inspiring a number of imitators), to produce a genre of orchid stories that reflected significant cultural shifts, not least in the presentation of female sexuality. It was only after these changes that scientists were able to see plants as equipped with agency, actively able to pursue their own, cunning reproductive strategies – and to outwit animals in the process. This paper traces the movement of a set of ideas that were created in a context that was recognizably scientific; they then became popular non-fiction, then popular fiction, and then inspired a new science, which in turn inspired a new generation of fiction writers. Long after clear barriers between elite and popular science had supposedly been established in the early twentieth century, they remained porous because a variety of imaginative writers kept destabilizing them. The fluidity of the boundaries between makers, interpreters and publics of scientific knowledge was a highly productive one; it helped biology become a vital part of public culture in the twentieth century and beyond.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Julian A. Steyermark and Bruce K. Holst , ‘Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana–VII contributions to the Flora of the Cerro Aracamuni, Venezuela’, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (1989) 76(4), pp. 962964

Richard Bellon , ‘Charles Darwin solves the “riddle of the flower”; or, why don't historians of biology know about the birds and the bees?’, History of Science (2009) 47, pp. 373406

Jonathan Smith , ‘Une fleur du mal? Swinburne's ‘the sundew’ and Darwin's insectivorous plants’, Victorian Poetry (2003) 41, pp. 131150

Charles R. Darwin , ‘On the three remarkable sexual forms of Catasetum Tridentatum, an orchid in the possession of the Linnean Society’, Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London (Botany) (1862) 6, pp. 151157

Richard Bellon , ‘Inspiration in the harness of daily labor: Darwin, botany, and the triumph of evolution, 1859–1868’, Isis (2011) 102, pp. 393420

James G. Lennox , ‘Darwin was a teleologist’, Biology and Philosophy (1993) 8(4), pp. 409421

John Angus Campbell , ‘Of orchids, insects, and natural theology: timing, tactics, and cultural critique in Darwin's post-“Origin” strategy’, Argumentation (1994) 8, pp. 6380

John Beatty , ‘Chance variation: Darwin on orchids’, Philosophy of Science (2006) 73(5), pp. 629641

Piers J. Hale , ‘Of mice and men: evolution and the socialist utopia. William Morris, H.G. Wells, and George Bernard Shaw’, Journal of the History of Biology (2010) 43(1), pp. 1766

John McNabb , ‘The beast within: H.G. Wells, the Island of Doctor Moreau, and human evolution in the mid-1890s’, Geological Journal (2015) 50, pp. 383397

Joseph O. Baylen , ‘W.T. Stead and the early career of H.G. Wells, 1895–1911’, Huntington Library Quarterly (1974) 38(1), pp. 5379

Oliver Gaycken , ‘The secret life of plants: visualizing vegetative movement, 1880–1903’, Early Popular Visual Culture (2012) 10(1), pp. 5169

Edward Bagnall Poulton , ‘Address of the president of Section D – Zoology, British Association for the Advancement of Science, London, September, 1931’, Science (1931) 74(1919), pp. 345360

Bernard Lightman , ‘The story of nature: Victorian popularizers and scientific narrative’, Victorian Review (2000) 25(2), pp. 187211

Jim Endersby , ‘Mutant utopias: evening primroses and imagined futures in early twentieth-century America’, Isis (2013) 104(3), pp. 471503

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 228
Total number of PDF views: 238 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1131 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.